EPO2-A: Evaluation of Pre-Oxygenation in Morbid Obesity: Effect of Position and Positive Pressure Ventilation
NCT ID: NCT02590406
Last Updated: 2020-03-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Body Mass Index on Positive End-expiratory Pressure Guided by Electrical Impedance Tomography for Patients Under General Anaesthesia
NCT04439604
Monitoring Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Anesthetized Morbidly Obese
NCT03694665
Postural Changes in Lung Volumes in Obesity
NCT02207192
Effect of Body Positioning on Upper Airway Patency During Induction of Anesthesia in Obese Patients
NCT01811069
Physiotherapy Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac or Thoracic Surgery
NCT02939729
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The major goal of the pre-oxygenation is to increase the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen available in the end-expiratory pulmonary volume. This can be done by replacing the nitrogen in the alveolus by oxygen and by increasing the pulmonary stocks, the FRC. It has been demonstrated that the FRC after the induction of anesthesia is cut by half for the obese. This reduction is explained by a diminished thoracic compliance and an increase of the dependent lung regions' atelectasis because of a more cephalic position of the diaphragm.
Various pre-oxygenation methods have been described to prolong the non hypoxic apnea time in the obese population. Some proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with the patient in the head up position (beach chair). It is a position derived from the ramped position described as the best to visualized the obese patients' glottis. Others proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with positive pressure ventilation, but only the supine position has been studied concomitantly.
Individually, these techniques of pre-oxygenation are superior to the combination of supine position and no positive pressure. Indeed, studies demonstrated that the beach chair position (derived from the ramped position) or the positive pressure pre-oxygenation in supine position diminished the time needed to obtain a satisfactory pre-oxygenation (End-expiratory oxygen fraction \>0,9) and a longer non hypoxic apnea time. Sill, these strategies have never been combined in the same protocol.
The beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation has become the standard of care because it is the position that allows the best glottis view. Though, it has been shown by Boyce and coll. that the reverse Trendelenburg position, and not the beach chair, increased the non hypoxic apnea time, the recuperation time and the minimal saturation obtained compared to the supine position. We think that there is an advantage to use the reverse Trendelenburg position to optimize the non hypoxic apnea time. Indeed, our hypothesis is that there will be less pressure on the diaphragm in comparison with the beach char position.
A studied realized by our group (EPO2-PV) evaluated the effect of three positions (Reverse Trendelenburg, beach chair and supine) and two ventilation strategies (spontaneous ventilation with or without positive pressure) on morbidly obese FRC in laboratory. The results showed a statistically significant difference on the FRC after a pre-oxygenation with positive pressure compared with the pre-oxygenation without positive pressure, and this regardless of the position. Moreover, for both ventilation strategies, results demonstrated a statistically significant superiority between the FRC obtained after pre-oxygenation in reverse Trendelenburg compared with the beach chair and the supine position. No improvement has been shown with the beach chair position.
Thereby, the current study will try to correlate the FRC results obtained in laboratory in actual non hypoxic apnea time in the operating room. This research design tries to compare, in patient receiving general anesthesia for bariatric surgeries, the effect of the pre-oxygenation with positive pressure and the reverse Trendelenburg position, on the non hypoxic apnea time in comparison with the actual standard of care, beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP
Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface
Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP
Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface
Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV
Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up.
NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface
Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV
Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up.
NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP
Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface
Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV
Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up.
NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Abdominal obesity : waist circumference: \> 115 for the women waist circumference \> 130 for the men
Exclusion Criteria
* Cranio-facial abnormality
* Asthma (continuous treatment)
* COPD (FEV1 \< 80%)
* Severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA \> 3)
* Pregnancy
* Tobacco use
* Know or suspected difficulty with intubation
* Severe GERD or risk of aspiration
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Laval University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antony Carrier-Boucher, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Bussières S Jean, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):595-600. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000072547.75928.B0.
Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.
Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):449-66. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9084-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):468-70. No abstract available.
Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O'Leary-Escolas U. Effect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jan;72(1):89-93. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00016.
Damia G, Mascheroni D, Croci M, Tarenzi L. Perioperative changes in functional residual capacity in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):574-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.5.574.
Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, Tredici S, Pedoto A, Lissoni A, Gattinoni L. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):654-60. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00031.
Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):706-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei231. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
Boyce JR, Ness T, Castroman P, Gleysteen JJ. A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning for the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003 Feb;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1381/096089203321136511.
Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1064-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04374.x.
Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
Levitan RM, Mechem CC, Ochroch EA, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Head-elevated laryngoscopy position: improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):322-30. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.87.
Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.
Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jul;56(7):680-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01374-3.x.
Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.
Delay JM, Sebbane M, Jung B, Nocca D, Verzilli D, Pouzeratte Y, Kamel ME, Fabre JM, Eledjam JJ, Jaber S. The effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation to enhance preoxygenation in morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1707-13. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318183909b.
Baraka AS, Hanna MT, Jabbour SI, Nawfal MF, Sibai AA, Yazbeck VG, Khoury NI, Karam KS. Preoxygenation of pregnant and nonpregnant women in the head-up versus supine position. Anesth Analg. 1992 Nov;75(5):757-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199211000-00018.
Lellouche F, Dionne S, Simard S, Bussieres J, Dagenais F. High tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients increase organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1072-82. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182522df5.
Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, Burn AJ, Schachter LM, Playfair JM, Laurie CP, O'Brien PE. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1110-5; discussion 5A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00009.
Couture EJ, Carrier-Boucher A, Provencher S, Tanoubi I, Marceau S, Bussieres JS. Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02128-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IUCPQ 21211
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.