Determination of ED90 of Intrathecal Lidocaine for Adequate Anesthesia for Elective Cervical Cerclage Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02574832

Last Updated: 2018-02-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical incompetence complicates approximately 1 in 500 pregnancies . Those women with cervical incompetence are at risk for second trimester spontaneous abortion and preterm labor. Cervical cerclage reduces these risks but must be performed under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Some anesthesiologists prefer neuraxial anesthesia, as it reduces fetal exposure to medications and avoids the risks associated with loss of maternal airway reflexes under general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia, in particular, has the added advantage of being technically simple while still providing a rapid, dense sensory block. For cerclage placement, patients require a sensory block from the T10 to S4 dermatome in order to cover sensation from the cervix as well as the vagina and perineum. Patients presenting for cerclage under spinal anesthesia pose a dosing challenge given the physiologic changes associated with pregnancy. As women progress with their pregnancy, they require lower doses of intrathecal local anesthetic to achieve similar block level. Multiple studies have demonstrated that these changes start during the second trimester. Inadequate sensory coverage with a spinal anesthetic typically necessitates conversion to general anesthesia, causing additional time wasted and added risk to the patient and fetus. Anecdotally, this is the reason why some anesthesiologists choose general anesthesia for patients undergoing cerclage over a spinal anesthetic. As there is currently no literature determining the correct dosage for these patients, we propose a dose-response study to determine the ED90 of intrathecal lidocaine for adequate anesthesia for elective cervical cerclage placement.The findings of this study will help determine the minimum dose of intrathecal lidocaine necessary to provide adequate spinal anesthesia for cervical cerclage for 90% of women. This will help decrease the frequency of inadequate anesthesia for cervical cerclage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Surgery Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Lidocaine Administration

Spinal anesthesia will be induced with isobaric 2% lidocaine and 15 μg fentanyl.

The study lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). If the lidocaine dose provides an unsatisfactory anesthetic, the case will be categorized as a failure. After a failed case, the next participant will receive a lidocaine dose increased by 4 mg. If the lidocaine dose provides satisfactory anesthesia, the next participant's lidocaine dose will determined by a biased allocation method with a 90% chance of maintaining the dose and a 10% chance of decreasing the dose by 4 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine Administration

Intervention Type DRUG

The lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). Two outcomes will be possible: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine Administration

The lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). Two outcomes will be possible: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine 2 % plus 15 μg fentanyl

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient who is at least 18 years old
* ASA physical class I or II
* BMI \<40 kg/m2,
* Presents for elective cervical cerclage during their first or second trimester of pregnancy will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any patient who is not a candidate for neuraxial anesthesia (including coagulopathy,
* Local skin infection, uncorrected hypovolemia)
* Allergy to lidocaine or fentanyl
* Chronic opioid user
* History of failed neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia,
* Had prior spine surgery
* Can not assume a sitting position for spinal anesthesia due to risk of amniotic membrane rupture
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paloma Toledo

Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paloma Toledo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prentice Women's Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ioscovich A, Popov A, Gimelfarb Y, Gozal Y, Orbach-Zinger S, Shapiro J, Ginosar Y. Anesthetic management of prophylactic cervical cerclage: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):509-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3391-5. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25103960 (View on PubMed)

Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H. Spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric amethocaine in pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Apr;74(4):384-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.4.384.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7734254 (View on PubMed)

Lee GY, Kim CH, Chung RK, Han JI, Kim DY. Spread of subarachnoid sensory block with hyperbaric bupivacaine in second trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Nov;21(7):482-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20006255 (View on PubMed)

Lee MH, Son HJ, Lee SH, Lee JH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of spread of subarachnoid sensory block and incidence of hypotension in early and late second trimester of pregnancy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Oct;65(4):322-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.322. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24228145 (View on PubMed)

Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17585226 (View on PubMed)

Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anaesth. 2003 May;50(5):460-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03021057.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12734154 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU0020134

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Control for Cervical Ripening Balloon
NCT07268118 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Cerclage for Twins With Short Cervix
NCT03077633 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3