Determination of ED90 of Intrathecal Lidocaine for Adequate Anesthesia for Elective Cervical Cerclage Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02574832
Last Updated: 2018-02-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerclage On LOw Risk Singletons: Cervical Cerclage for Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Low Risk Singleton Pregnancies With Short Cervix
NCT03251729
Multifactorial Approach to Emergent Cerclage
NCT01114516
Obstetric Outcome in Pregnancies Treated With Laparoscopic Cerclage
NCT05863481
Cerclage for Short Cervix in Twins
NCT02912390
Prophylactic Lidocaine Spray for Pain Alleviation in Women Undergoing Osmotic Dilator Insertion for Second Trimester Dilatation and Evacuation
NCT02097017
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal Lidocaine Administration
Spinal anesthesia will be induced with isobaric 2% lidocaine and 15 μg fentanyl.
The study lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). If the lidocaine dose provides an unsatisfactory anesthetic, the case will be categorized as a failure. After a failed case, the next participant will receive a lidocaine dose increased by 4 mg. If the lidocaine dose provides satisfactory anesthesia, the next participant's lidocaine dose will determined by a biased allocation method with a 90% chance of maintaining the dose and a 10% chance of decreasing the dose by 4 mg.
Lidocaine Administration
The lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). Two outcomes will be possible: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine Administration
The lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). Two outcomes will be possible: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA physical class I or II
* BMI \<40 kg/m2,
* Presents for elective cervical cerclage during their first or second trimester of pregnancy will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Local skin infection, uncorrected hypovolemia)
* Allergy to lidocaine or fentanyl
* Chronic opioid user
* History of failed neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia,
* Had prior spine surgery
* Can not assume a sitting position for spinal anesthesia due to risk of amniotic membrane rupture
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paloma Toledo
Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paloma Toledo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prentice Women's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ioscovich A, Popov A, Gimelfarb Y, Gozal Y, Orbach-Zinger S, Shapiro J, Ginosar Y. Anesthetic management of prophylactic cervical cerclage: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):509-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3391-5. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H. Spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric amethocaine in pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Apr;74(4):384-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.4.384.
Lee GY, Kim CH, Chung RK, Han JI, Kim DY. Spread of subarachnoid sensory block with hyperbaric bupivacaine in second trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Nov;21(7):482-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.018.
Lee MH, Son HJ, Lee SH, Lee JH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of spread of subarachnoid sensory block and incidence of hypotension in early and late second trimester of pregnancy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Oct;65(4):322-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.322. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a.
Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anaesth. 2003 May;50(5):460-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03021057.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU0020134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.