Cervical Cerclage for Preventing Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancies Without Prior Spontaneous Preterm Birth and With Short Transvaginal Ultrasound Cervical Length
NCT ID: NCT02746900
Last Updated: 2016-04-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
587 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2019-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Different strategies have been adopted for prevention of SPTB. Growing interest has focused on pessary for prevention of SPTB. Cervical pessary is relatively non-invasive, easy to use, does not require anesthesia, can be used in an outpatient clinic setting, and it is easily removed when necessary. However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials showed that in singleton pregnancies with short cervix, prophylactic use of the pessary did not reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery or improve perinatal outcome. The evidence supports the use of vaginal progesterone in singleton pregnancies with short cervix, while cervical cerclage seems to be beneficial only in the subgroup of women with both prior SPTB and TVU CL ≤25mm. Interestingly, only 235 singletons without prior SPTB,7 and 504 singletons gestations with prior SPTB,6 have been included in randomized studies on cerclage for TVU CL ≤25mm. A meta-analysis of four trials showed that cervical cerclage did not prevent SPTB in women with short TVU CL and without prior preterm birth.7 However, even if the statistical significance were not reached, they found a reduction in SPTB \<35 weeks by 16% in singletons with short TVU CL and without prior SPTB (20.6% vs 31.2%; relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.17) and by 24% in singletons without risk factors for SPTB (25.6% vs 33.3%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.15).
Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of cervical cerclage in prevention of SPTB in singleton pregnancies with short TVU CL in second trimester, without prior SPTB.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pessary in Singleton Gestations With Short Cervix Without Prior Preterm Birth
NCT02716909
Does Cervical Pessary Prevent Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies With Short Cervical Length?
NCT02708264
Cerclage for Singletons With Short Cervix Without Prior Preterm Birth
NCT02716922
Cerclage On LOw Risk Singletons: Cervical Cerclage for Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Low Risk Singleton Pregnancies With Short Cervix
NCT03251729
Single Versus Double Suture Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth
NCT04742647
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Women with TVU CL ≤25mm who will meet the inclusion criteria will be counselled by an obstetrician regarding the risk of SPTB as per standard of care. The patient will be given ample time to have all questions addressed and consider participation. If the patient agrees to participate in the study, the informed consent form will be signed and a copy will be given to the patient. Women who are eligible and consent to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: cervical cerclage (i.e. intervention group) or standard obstetric management (i.e. control group).
Investigators planned subgroup analyses according to different CL cutoffs (i.e. \<=15 and \<=10 mm); type of suture; and according to prior history of cervical surgery (i.e. LEEP or cone biopsy).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical cerclage
After the woman is placed in the dorsal lithotomy position and the bladder is emptied with a urinary catheter to reduce the chance of bladder injury, surgical preparation with Betadine will be performed. Breisky retractors and Sims retractors will be used to exposure the entire cervix. Sponge ring forceps will be used to optimized visualization of the cervix and provide the necessary countertraction at the suture entry and exit sites. McDonald technique will be performed placing 4-6 bites circumferentially around the cervix. Only one stitch will be used. The suture will be places as high as feasible
Cervical cerclage
McDonald cervical cerclage
No intervention
Bed rest will be not recommended.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cervical cerclage
McDonald cervical cerclage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Singleton pregnancy
* Cervical length \<=25mm between 18(0) and 23(6) weeks
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior spontaneous preterm birth or second trimester losses between 16(0) and 36(6) weeks
* Cerclage in situ
* Painful regular uterine contraction and/or preterm labor
* Ruptured membranes
* Major fetal defects
* Active vaginal bleeding
* Placenda previa and/or accreta
* Cervical dilation \>1.5 cm and/or visible membranes by pelvic exam
* Suspicion of chorioamnionitis
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federico II University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gabriele Saccone
Medical Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gabriele Saccone
Napoli, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
100/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.