Cerclage for the Reduction of Extreme Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix or Dilatation

NCT ID: NCT05968794

Last Updated: 2023-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-15

Study Completion Date

2028-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age.

The main question it aims to answer is: What is the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age?

Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention (cerclage) or comparison (no cerclage) group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: In the Netherlands, 250 women with a twin pregnancy deliver at \< 28 weeks per year, resulting in 157 perinatal deaths. A vaginal cerclage could be an effective surgical method to reduce cervical insufficiency and with that preterm birth, but the evidence regarding its effectiveness on extreme preterm birth and (long term) neonatal outcome is lacking.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: A vaginal cerclage is a minor and safe surgical procedure commonly performed in singleton pregnancies with a short cervix and a previous preterm birth in all the participating centers, thus there is experience in the participating hospitals. The results of this study will show whether a vaginal cerclage reduces extreme preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy and a short cervix, and its accompanying perinatal complications. If proven effective, the implementation of this intervention will have a huge impact on the lifelong health of these children and their families.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

International, multicenter randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Participants and investigators will not be blinded for the intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cerclage

A vaginal cerclage is a short and minor surgical procedure performed under general or regional anesthesia. An unabsorbable suture is placed around/through the cervix to close the cervical canal and to increase its firmness, in order to reduce cervical insufficiency.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vaginal cerclage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A vaginal cerclage is a short and minor surgical procedure performed under general or regional anesthesia. An unabsorbable suture is placed around/through the cervix to close the cervical canal and to increase its firmness, in order to reduce cervical insufficiency.

Standard care

The comparator will be standard treatment according to the current Dutch (NVOG) guideline from 2018, which is to not perform or offer an intervention such as vaginal cerclage. This is in line with the standard care in the participating hospitals in Belgium.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal cerclage

A vaginal cerclage is a short and minor surgical procedure performed under general or regional anesthesia. An unabsorbable suture is placed around/through the cervix to close the cervical canal and to increase its firmness, in order to reduce cervical insufficiency.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* an asymptomatic short cervix at routine ultrasound investigation (below 24 weeks of gestation) OR
* cervical dilatation (below 24 weeks of gestation)

Exclusion Criteria

* Women with a mono-amniotic twin pregnancy
* Women with twin pregnancy in which one or both children are diagnosed with a major structural, congenital or chromosomal abnormality that is likely to influence the composite adverse neonatal outcome.
* Women with dilatation of the cervix and signs of clinical intra-uterine infection, defined by the presence of fever ≥ 38 degrees Celsius.
* Women with overt symptoms of preterm labour at time of measurement of short cervix (regular contractions, PPROM, recurrent blood loss).
* Women with a placenta previa, defined as a placenta position covering the internal ostium of the cervix.
* Women who do not master the Dutch of English language and therefore not able to give written consent
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Martijn A. Oudijk, MD, PhD

Prof.dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Antwerpen

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Sint-Lucas Brugge

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hospital Oost-Limburg Genk

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Gent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Amsterdam

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Leiden

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Maastricht

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Erasmus Medical Centre

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Maxima Medical Centre

Veldhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lissa van gils, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31642811240

Martijn A Oudijk, MD, PhD, Prof

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Y Jacquemyn, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

C van Holsbeke, dr

Role: primary

W Gyselaers, Prof.Dr.

Role: primary

I Dehaene, Dr.

Role: primary

L Lewi, Dr

Role: primary

M.A. Oudijk, Prof.Dr.

Role: primary

J.R. Prins, Dr

Role: primary

E.M. Lutke-Holzik, Dr

Role: primary

S Al-Nassiry, Dr

Role: primary

J van Drongelen, Dr

Role: primary

S Schoenmakers, Dr

Role: primary

J.B Derks, Dr

Role: primary

J van Laar, Dr

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Gils L, de Boer MA, Bosmans J, Duijnhoven R, Schoenmakers S, Derks JB, Prins JR, Al-Nasiry S, Lutke Holzik M, Lopriore E, van Drongelen J, Knol MH, van Laar JOEH, Jacquemyn Y, van Holsbeke C, Dehaene I, Lewi L, van der Merwe H, Gyselaers W, Obermann-Borst SA, Holthuis M, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Oudijk MA. Study protocol for two randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of Cerclage in the reduction of extreme preterm birth and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies with a short cervix or dilatation: the TWIN Cerclage studies. BMJ Open. 2024 May 10;14(5):e081561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081561.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38729756 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TwinC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cerclage for Twins With Short Cervix
NCT03077633 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Progesterone and Cervical Pessary in Twins
NCT03058536 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3