HHHFNC (Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula) Versus NCPAP for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity
NCT ID: NCT02570217
Last Updated: 2015-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
316 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of relative "new" form of respiratory support (HHHFNC) versus a more common one (NCPAP).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing HHHFNC and nCPAP Ventilation Methods for the Prevention of Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants
NCT02887846
Study of Respiratory Physiology During High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment in Preterm Neonates.
NCT02200900
Infant Pulmonary Mechanics: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP
NCT01939067
nHFOV vs nCPAP: Effects on Gas Exchange for the Treatment of Neonates Recovering From RDS
NCT02772835
Nasal High Frequency in Preterm Neonates
NCT06687083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
They are randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups cited in "brief summary" by means of closed envelops. A block randomization is applided with a blok size of 4. The randomization is stratified per groups accoring to gestational age: from 29+0 to 32+6; from 33+0 to 34+6; from 35+0 to 36+6 weeks+days.
Once the treatment is started, for the group NCPAP there is the possibility to switch to the mode "Bi-PAP" if: there are more than 4 episodes of apnoea per hour or more than 2 episodes requiring positive pressure ventilation or if deemed by clinicians for increased work of breathing assesed by the Silverman score.
For all the groups, if the FiO2 requirement is persistently higher than 0.35-0.40 per target SpO2 86-93% and/or dyspnoea defined by Silverman score \> 6 after starting the respiratory support, newborns receive Surfactant by "INSURE" technique, involving endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopic vision, endotracheal administration of surfactant (Curosurf, Chiesi Pharmaceutics, Parma, Italy) 200 mg/kg and finally extubation.
After the administration of surfactant, if FiO2 requirement is persistently \>0.4 to keep SpO2 86-93% or severe apnea episodes are present (apnea episodes \> 4/hr or \>2/hr requiring positive pressure ventilation) or at the blood gas (capillary or venous) PaCO2\>70 mmHg and pH\<7.20, newborns are intubated and mechanically ventilated.
For all the newborns enrolled in the study, capillary or venous blood gas is checked every 6-12 hours, a cerebral and cardiac ultrasound screening is performed within 24 hrs. Further controls follow the routine of the ward.
Weaning is started decreasing HHHFNC flow by 1 lpm or nCPAP pressure by 1 cmH2O pressure if infants are presenting FIO2 \< 0.30 to target SpO2 and minimal or no signs of respiratory effort. The respiratory support is discontinued for flow ≤ 2 lpm or pressure ≤ 2 cmH2O.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HHHFNC
The patients receive respiratory support by mean of Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal cannula
HHHFNC
infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of HHHFNC
NCPAP
Patients receive respiratory support by Nasal Continuous Positive Airways Pressure(NCPAP)
NCPAP
infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of NCPAP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HHHFNC
infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of HHHFNC
NCPAP
infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of NCPAP
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parental Consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Major congenital malformations
* Severe intra ventricular hemorrage diagnosed early after birth
29 Weeks
36 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr Anna Lavizzari
UNKNOWN
Dr Francesca Gaia Ciuffini
UNKNOWN
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mariarosa Colnaghi
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mariarosa Colnaghi, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, Mosca F. Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRCCSMaggioreH
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HHHFNC vs NCPAP 2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.