HHHFNC (Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula) Versus NCPAP for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity

NCT ID: NCT02570217

Last Updated: 2015-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

316 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preterm infants ranging from 29+0 to 36+6 weeks+days are randomly assigned to one of the following treatments as non invasive respiratory support if they develop mild to moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome within 72 hrs from birth: 1) NCPAP set at 4-6 cmH2O or 2) HHHFNC providing a flow 4-6 l/min.

The aim of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of relative "new" form of respiratory support (HHHFNC) versus a more common one (NCPAP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preterm infants are eligible to the study if they present mild to moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) defined by the following criteria: need of FiO2 ( Fraction of Inspired Oxygen) ≥0.30 to keep a target SpO2 (Periferal Oxygen Saturation) beetween 88-93% and/or Silverman score ≥5. To confirm the diagnosis a Chest XR is performed as routinarily in the ward before starting the respiratory support.

They are randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups cited in "brief summary" by means of closed envelops. A block randomization is applided with a blok size of 4. The randomization is stratified per groups accoring to gestational age: from 29+0 to 32+6; from 33+0 to 34+6; from 35+0 to 36+6 weeks+days.

Once the treatment is started, for the group NCPAP there is the possibility to switch to the mode "Bi-PAP" if: there are more than 4 episodes of apnoea per hour or more than 2 episodes requiring positive pressure ventilation or if deemed by clinicians for increased work of breathing assesed by the Silverman score.

For all the groups, if the FiO2 requirement is persistently higher than 0.35-0.40 per target SpO2 86-93% and/or dyspnoea defined by Silverman score \> 6 after starting the respiratory support, newborns receive Surfactant by "INSURE" technique, involving endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopic vision, endotracheal administration of surfactant (Curosurf, Chiesi Pharmaceutics, Parma, Italy) 200 mg/kg and finally extubation.

After the administration of surfactant, if FiO2 requirement is persistently \>0.4 to keep SpO2 86-93% or severe apnea episodes are present (apnea episodes \> 4/hr or \>2/hr requiring positive pressure ventilation) or at the blood gas (capillary or venous) PaCO2\>70 mmHg and pH\<7.20, newborns are intubated and mechanically ventilated.

For all the newborns enrolled in the study, capillary or venous blood gas is checked every 6-12 hours, a cerebral and cardiac ultrasound screening is performed within 24 hrs. Further controls follow the routine of the ward.

Weaning is started decreasing HHHFNC flow by 1 lpm or nCPAP pressure by 1 cmH2O pressure if infants are presenting FIO2 \< 0.30 to target SpO2 and minimal or no signs of respiratory effort. The respiratory support is discontinued for flow ≤ 2 lpm or pressure ≤ 2 cmH2O.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Newborn Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HHHFNC

The patients receive respiratory support by mean of Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal cannula

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HHHFNC

Intervention Type DEVICE

infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of HHHFNC

NCPAP

Patients receive respiratory support by Nasal Continuous Positive Airways Pressure(NCPAP)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NCPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of NCPAP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HHHFNC

infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of HHHFNC

Intervention Type DEVICE

NCPAP

infants receive non-invasive respiratory support by mean of NCPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PRECISION FLOW (Vapotherm,Stevensville, USA) Infant Flow Driver System (EME Ltd, Brighton, Sussex, UK) SiPAP (Viasys Healthcare, Palm Springs, CA)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inborn
* Parental Consent

Exclusion Criteria

* No parental consent
* Major congenital malformations
* Severe intra ventricular hemorrage diagnosed early after birth
Minimum Eligible Age

29 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

36 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr Anna Lavizzari

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Francesca Gaia Ciuffini

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mariarosa Colnaghi

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mariarosa Colnaghi, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, Mosca F. Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27532363 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRCCSMaggioreH

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HHHFNC vs NCPAP 2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.