Should I Continue Taking My Acid Reflux Medication? Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient Decision Aid

NCT ID: NCT02558049

Last Updated: 2017-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treat problems such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In many patients with mild or moderate GERD, PPIs should be used for 1-2 months but are often continued longer unnecessarily. This is a problem because PPIs may cause harm when used long-term. PPI use is associated with severe C. difficile infections, fractures and pneumonia. Canada's public drug programs spent $247 million on PPIs in 2012 (not including Quebec or PEI). Due to concerns with long-term PPI use, patients may face the decision to continue their PPI, use a lower dose or stop and use on-demand (only when symptoms return). This decision should be made collaboratively between patients and clinicians, though patients tend to have a poor understanding of when reducing a drug is appropriate. Using a lower dose or using on-demand may be viewed as difficult because of the chance of symptoms returning. Patient decision aids (PDAs) inform patients on benefits and risks of treatment options and improve ability to make informed decisions and clarify values. OBJECTIVES: Develop a PDA to help patients with the decision to continue PPI or stop and use on-demand/use a lower dose. Evaluate whether: 1) the PDA changes patient preference to continue or stop and use on-demand/use a lower dose of PPI 2) the PDA improves patient knowledge and realistic expectations 3) patients and pharmacists feel they made a shared decision 4) there is a change in PPI prescribing 8 weeks post-PDA and 5) patients' choices match up with their values. METHODOLOGY: The PDA will be developed by a team of doctors, pharmacists and patients. It will be delivered during a visit with a pharmacist. Patients (n=54) will indicate which choice they prefer (continue PPI/stop or use lower dose) before and after going through the PDA. We will use Mcnemar's test to compare the number of patients preferring to continue their PPI before and after. We will evaluate whether there is a difference in knowledge test scores and expectations test scores before and after the PDA. After the PDA, we will ask patients and pharmacists to rate the extent to which shared decision making occurred and measure the agreement. Values/choice congruence will be evaluated using logistic regression. Eight weeks after patients have received the PDA, we will look at whether there is any reduction in PPI use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decision aid

Patients will receive the patient decision aid during a 15 minute consultation with a clinical pharmacist.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decision aid

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive a patient decision aid which outlines the potential benefits and harms of proton pump inhibitor use, as well as the potential benefits and harms of switching to a lower dose of PPI or stopping and using on-demand (only when symptoms occur). The decision aid also allows participants to clarify their values regarding these potential benefits and harms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision aid

Participants will receive a patient decision aid which outlines the potential benefits and harms of proton pump inhibitor use, as well as the potential benefits and harms of switching to a lower dose of PPI or stopping and using on-demand (only when symptoms occur). The decision aid also allows participants to clarify their values regarding these potential benefits and harms.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Taking PPI for greater than or equal to 4 weeks, no current symptoms, taking PPI for mild to moderate upper GI symptoms (mild to moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease, grade A/B esophagitis)

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe esophagitis (grade C/D), severe GERD or upper GI symptoms, currently experiencing upper GI symptoms, taking PPI for gastroprotection due to NSAID therapy (at moderate or high risk of GI bleed), history of Barrett's esophagus, history of bleeding peptic ulcer, taking PPI for treatment of current ulcer not healed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wade Thompson

MSc student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Elisabeth Bruyere Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Melrose FHT

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Rideau FHT

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):308-28; quiz 329. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. Epub 2013 Feb 19. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23419381 (View on PubMed)

Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Oct 1;76(7):1005-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17956071 (View on PubMed)

Leri F, Ayzenberg M, Voyce SJ, Klein A, Hartz L, Smego RA Jr. Four-year trends of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor use after hospital discharge. South Med J. 2013 Apr;106(4):270-3. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31828db01f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23558416 (View on PubMed)

Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, Singh S, Cavallazzi R, Loke YK. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.108. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22525304 (View on PubMed)

Yu EW, Bauer SR, Bain PA, Bauer DC. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies. Am J Med. 2011 Jun;124(6):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21605729 (View on PubMed)

Spijker-Huiges A, Winters JC, Meyboom-De Jong B. Patients' views on dyspepsia and acid suppressant drug therapy in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(1):10-4. doi: 10.1080/13814780600757120.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16945866 (View on PubMed)

Reeve E, To J, Hendrix I, Shakib S, Roberts MS, Wiese MD. Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0106-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23912674 (View on PubMed)

Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Mullen PD, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24625093 (View on PubMed)

Durand MA, Witt J, Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe RG, Politi MC, Sivell S, Elwyn G. Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25577469 (View on PubMed)

Legare F, Turcotte S, Stacey D, Ratte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID. Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice. Patient. 2012;5(1):1-19. doi: 10.2165/11592180-000000000-00000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22276987 (View on PubMed)

Lachenbruch PA. On the sample size for studies based upon McNemar's test. Stat Med. 1992 Aug;11(11):1521-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111110.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1410964 (View on PubMed)

Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3091-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15284259 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4393

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment Stop
NCT00120315 COMPLETED PHASE4
Nexium Dyspepsia/AST
NCT00251914 COMPLETED PHASE3