Contribution of Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) to the Evaluation of Healing After Amputation of the Leg
NCT ID: NCT02551484
Last Updated: 2026-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-15
2018-11-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\- For procedure 1: Patients will be selected during multidisciplinary consultations for amputees who are stabilized with their definitive prosthesis and have returned to their usual place of residence. The aim of this procedure is to show the validity and reproducibility of measurements of tissue oxygenation using NIRS (TcPO2 being the reference measurement), to determine the way in which NIRS measurements are more precise (i.e. in terms of validity and reproductibility) (values at rest with the patient lying perfectly flat or with the amputated limb raised 30°). These patients will require a single visit which will include measurements by NIRS and TCPO2, a walk test and the completion of 2 questionnaires (visual scale).
\- For procedure 2: The patients will be included in the initial phase of postamputation rehabilitation, during the period of in-hospital rehabilitation. The main problems of healing and tolerance to the temporary prosthesis arise during this phase. The specific objectives will be: To show that measurement by NIRS predicts the quality of healing in trans-tibial amputees; to show that the zone of uncertainty concerning the predictive values for the viability of the stump is smaller with NIRS than with TcPO2 (better discrimination). NIRS and TCPO2 measurements as well as the evaluation of stump healing will be done 15, 30 and 45 days after the amputation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing New Prothesis PROPRIO-FOOT® Versus Usual Prothesis Tasks Tibial Amputees
NCT02501408
Influence of Diabetes on Lower Limb Amputation
NCT02500303
Deploying Digital Prosthetic Interface Technology and Exercise in Dysvascular Amputees
NCT05656924
Evaluating the Outcomes for Incisional Application of Negative Pressure for Nontraumatic Amputations
NCT03250442
Assessing the Feasibility of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Phantom Pain Immediately Following Lower Limb Amputation
NCT06638918
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Procedure 1
Measures with 60 minutes interval during the consultation of equipment, functional testing, receuil pain.
Measurements using NIRS
TCPO2 measurements
2-minute walk test
Procedure 2
Measuring J15, J30 J 45 and after the different settings functional amputation, pain and tissue oxygenation.
Measurements using NIRS
TCPO2 measurements
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Measurements using NIRS
TCPO2 measurements
2-minute walk test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have agreed to take part in the study
* Patients with National Health Insurance cover,
* Patients (men or women aged between 18 and 85 years, presenting unilateral transtibial amputation for PAD.
* Able to understand simple instructions
Procedure 1:
* Stabilized patients with their definitive prosthesis, with no modification of the prosthesis in the previous 3 months and at least 6 months after the amputation.
* Definitive prosthesis with a contact socket.
* Patients able to do a 2-minute walk test.
Procedure 2:
\- Patients in the initial phase of post-amputation (temporary prosthesis, rehabilitation) following unilateral transtibial amputation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under guardianship.
* Patients with associated chronic motor deficiency, of a neurological origin (examples: sequelae of stroke, balance and coordination disorders), or osteo-articular disease (examples: knee or hip osteoarthritis), given their secondary functional impact, making it impossible for amputees to walk with a prosthesis.
* Severe medical disorder that significantly impairs functional abilities (severe heart failure, respiratory failure, non-stabilized metabolic disorders, such as progressive kidney failure) and diseases with an impact on short or medium-term survival (progressive neoplastic disease, non-stabilized systemic disease).
* Complications, other than microcirculatory, with the stump, able to affect the use of a contact socket: hematoma, formation of cysts, fluid build-up, calcifications of soft tissues, bone spur, infection (skin, abscess), neurinoma, deterioration of the knee joint of the amputated limb, angle of the tibial cut leading to specifically painful osteo-cutaneous impingement, venous thrombosis, abnormal shape of the stump making it unsuitable for a socket (flexum of the knee, "pear shaped" stumps or stumps with severe invaginations )…
* Local skin disorders in the measurement zone (summit of the antero-external area) of the stump compromising the quality of the signals picked up by the electrode (NIRS and TcPO2) : severe edema, hyperkeratosis, ulceration, inflammatory and infectious phenomena.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de DIJON
Dijon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Laroche D, Barnay JL, Tourlonias B, Orta C, Obert C, Casillas JM. Microcirculatory Assessment of Arterial Below-Knee Stumps: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Versus Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension-A Preliminary Study in Prosthesis Users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CASILLAS Fd. Avenir 2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.