Evaluating Accuracy, Impact, and Operational Challenges of GeneXpert Use for TB Case Finding Among HIV-infected Persons
NCT ID: NCT02538952
Last Updated: 2019-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
18696 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-01
2017-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Interventions for Evaluation: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the GeneXpert platform (Xpert) has a TB diagnostic sensitivity of 82.4%, significantly superior to that of smear microscopy (44.6%). In line with WHO guidelines, the Botswana Ministry of Health (MOH) and CDC rapidly rolled out the Xpert device and a new Xpert-based diagnostic algorithm in service of 22 HIV care and treatment clinics. To maximize impact of the Xpert device in improving detection of active TB, Xpert rollout was preceded by strengthening of TB screening procedures by: (1) adopting the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (2) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in facilities; and (3) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. The combination of these strengthened TB screening procedures and rollout of the Xpert device is referred to as the "Xpert package" in this protocol.
Key Evaluation Objectives: The protocol has two key objectives: (1) to evaluate whether the new MOH-recommended Xpert-based TB diagnostic algorithm for new adult HIV clinic enrollees is more sensitive than the pre-Xpert smear-microscopy-based algorithm in diagnosing culture-positive TB disease; and (2) to evaluate the impact of the whole "Xpert package" on all-cause mortality during the first 6 months of ART, among adult patients.
Design: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. Sample Size: 6,136 patients were prospectively enrolled to meet the first primary objective. A retrospective cohort of 10,131 persons was also enrolled to meet the second objective. Projected power to meet both objectives is \>80%.
Time line: Prospective cohort enrollment started in July 2012 and was complete by March 2014. Retrospective cohort enrollment was complete by March 2015. Patient follow-up and data entry will be complete in March 2016 at which time analysis to answer the first two primary study questions will be possible.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
NCT01554384
Effect of Xpert MTB/RIF on Patient Outcomes
NCT02729532
Gene Xpert Diagnosis of TB Using Tracheal Aspirates From Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients
NCT01530568
Xpert Active Case-finding Trial 2: Community-based Active Case-finding for Tuberculosis in South Africa
NCT03168945
DIAgnostics for Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis in Africa
NCT03303963
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Public Health Intervention: The recent development of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the GeneXpert platform (Xpert) has revolutionized TB diagnostic capability for clinicians managing HIV-infected patients. Among HIV-infected adults, TB diagnostic sensitivity of Xpert (82.4%) has been proven superior to that of smear microscopy (44.6%). In line with World Health organization (WHO) guidelines, the Botswana Ministry of Health (MOH) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), initiated a project in July 2012 to rapidly rollout 13 Xpert devices in service of 22 HIV care and treatment clinics while simultaneously initiating an evaluation to answer important operational research questions that can inform future national scale-up. To maximize the impact of the Xpert device in improving detection of active TB, the Xpert rollout was preceded by strengthening of TB screening procedures by: (1) ensuring the 22 HIV care and treatment clinics adopted the WHO-recommended four-symptom TB screen for adults; (2) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in all 22 facilities; and (3) training health facility personnel in both smear-microscopy-based and Xpert-based TB diagnostic algorithms. The combination of these strengthened TB screening procedures and rollout of the Xpert device is referred to as the "Xpert package" in this proposal.
Key Evaluation Objectives: The evaluation component of this project has two key objectives: (1) to evaluate whether the new MOH-recommended Xpert-based pulmonary TB diagnostic algorithm (including Xpert testing of sputum samples for all TB suspects and chest x-ray for Xpert-negative TB suspects) is more sensitive than the pre-Xpert smear-microscopy-based algorithm (smear microscopy and chest x-ray for smear-negative TB suspects) in diagnosing culture-positive TB disease; and (2) to evaluate the impact of the whole "Xpert package" on all-cause mortality during the first six months of ART, among adult patients.
Rationale for the First Evaluation Objective: Although it is expected that the Xpert-based TB diagnostic algorithm will be both more sensitive and more specific than the pre-Xpert algorithm, superiority of the Xpert- over the microscopy-based algorithm in Botswana has not yet been evaluated.
Rationale for the Second Evaluation Objective: In Botswana, undiagnosed TB or TB diagnosed late in the course of disease is thought to be the most common cause of death among HIV-infected persons receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). The Xpert package could conceivably reduce TB-related mortality by ensuring all patients are screened for TB and ensuring TB suspects have access to a sensitive TB test (Xpert). Since the start of our Botswana stepped wedge trial in 2012, two separate but related randomized trials in Africa, the TB-NEAT study and the XTEND trial, have fallen short of demonstrating an association between use of Xpert for patients with symptoms of TB and reduced TB mortality. However, limitations in both these trials mean that the question of whether Xpert can reduce early ART mortality has not been definitively answered.
Design: Because the Xpert package is expected to have a beneficial effect for patients enrolling in the 22 study clinics, a phased rollout of the Xpert device using a stepped wedge design was chosen. Prior to Xpert device rollout, all 22 facilities initiated the intensified TB screening procedures simultaneously. Subsequently, 13 Xpert devices were activated in a step-wise manner over nine months with either one or two Xpert devices activated per month and the order of Xpert device rollout randomly assigned.
This step-wedge design involved enrollment of three cohorts:
1. Prospective cohort A (enrolled pre-Xpert device rollout): All patients who attended one of the 22 HIV clinics for the first time after study start (July 31, 2012), but before Xpert device rollout, were eligible for this cohort.
2. Prospective cohort B (enrolled post-Xpert device rollout): All patients who attend one of the 22 HIV clinics for the first time after Xpert device rollout were eligible for this cohort.
3. Retrospective cohort: All patients who initiated ART at one of the 22 HIV clinics for the first time in the 24 months before study start.
To answer the first primary study question, sensitivity of the pre- Xpert TB diagnostic algorithm in prospective cohort A will be compared with the post- Xpert algorithm sensitivity in prospective cohort B.
To answer the second primary study question, the investigators will compare 6-month ART mortality rates of ART enrollees in the retrospective cohort with 6-month ART mortality rates in prospective cohort B.
Power to Answer First Primary Study Question: Fisher's Exact Test sample size formula for comparing two proportions and Proc Power features in SAS version 9.2. software, were used to estimate study power. Power estimates were adjusted for the expected design effect to account for intra-cluster correlation. For design effect calculations, an intra-class correlation of 0.05 was assumed. With an anticipated sample size of 6,136 prospective enrollees (1,878 pre-Xpert and 4,258 post-Xpert), the study is estimated to have \>80% power to detect pre- versus post-Xpert TB diagnostic sensitivities, assuming a culture-positive TB prevalence of 4% among prospective cohort enrollees, if pre-Xpert sensitivity is ≤52.5% and post-Xpert sensitivity is ≥82.5%.
Power to Answer Second Primary Study Question: As of August 2015, 10,131 ART patient medical records had been abstracted for the retrospective cohort. Published literature suggests pre-Xpert 6-month ART mortality rates should be about 15 per 100 person years (PY). Using published cluster randomized trial (CRT) power formulae adapted for stepped wedge trials and anticipated study sample sizes, the study has \>80% power to detect a difference in 6-month all-cause ART mortality between cohorts R and B of 50% if cohort R mortality is ≥6/100 PY and of 40% if cohort R mortality is ≥13/100 PY.
Procedures: All 22 health facilities were assessed prior to training to troubleshoot potential logistical barriers to successful study implementation. All personnel involved in study procedures were trained before study start and closely supervised during implementation. Patients enrolled in the prospective cohorts are being followed for six months after HIV clinic enrollment, or through the end of TB treatment, whichever is later. Tracing of ART patients in retrospective and prospective cohorts, who are documented as late for appointments or lost to follow-up (missed last scheduled appointment by \>60 days) has been performed according to national guidelines to facilitate estimation of true 6-month ART mortality.
Time line: Prospective cohort enrollment started in July 2012 and was complete by March 2014. Retrospective cohort enrollment was complete by March 2015. Patient follow-up and data entry will be complete in March 2016 at which time analysis to answer the first two primary study questions will be possible.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Xpert package
There are three phases to this stepped-wedge trial: (1) the retrospective cohort (standard of care) phase, (2) the active comparator phase, where intensified TB case finding (ICF) interventions are in place but no Xpert device, and (3) the "experimental phase" of full Xpert package implementation that includes both ICF interventions and Xpert device activation. Interventions in the experimental phase therefore include: (a) adoption of the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (b) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in the 22 facilities; (c) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms; and (d) Xpert device activation. The combination of the ICF interventions and rollout of the Xpert device is referred to as the "Xpert package" in this protocol.
Xpert device
Interventions in the "Experimental phase" of this stepped-wedge trial include: (a) ensuring WHO-recommended TB screening adopted, (b) situating trained TB case finding nurses in the clinics, (c) training clinic personnel in the TB diagnostic algorithms, and (d) activation of the Xpert diagnostic device.
Intensified TB Case Finding (ICF)
Interventions in the active comparator phase of this stepped wedge trial only include: (a) adoption of the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (b) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in the 22 facilities; and (c) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. There is no Xpert device activation in this phase. Only the standard of care microscopy algorithm (smear microscopy and chest x-ray) are available during this phase.
Active comparator
There are three phases to this stepped-wedge trial: (1) the retrospective cohort (standard of care) phase, (2) the active comparator phase, where intensified TB case finding (ICF) interventions are in place but no Xpert device, and (3) the "experimental phase" of full Xpert package implementation that includes both ICF interventions and Xpert device activation. Interventions in the active comparator phase therefore include only: (a) adoption of the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (b) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in the 22 facilities; and (c) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. There is no Xpert device activation in this phase. Only standard of care microscopy-based TB diagnostic algorithms are available during this phase.
Intensified TB Case Finding (ICF)
Interventions in the active comparator phase of this stepped wedge trial only include: (a) adoption of the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (b) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in the 22 facilities; and (c) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. There is no Xpert device activation in this phase. Only the standard of care microscopy algorithm (smear microscopy and chest x-ray) are available during this phase.
Standard of Care
There are three phases to this stepped-wedge trial: (1) the retrospective cohort (standard of care) phase, (2) the active comparator phase, where intensified TB case finding (ICF) interventions are in place but no Xpert device, and (3) the "experimental phase" of full Xpert package implementation that includes both ICF interventions and Xpert device activation. There are no interventions in the standard of care arm (retrospective cohort). There are no ICF interventions and no Xpert device activations in this phase. Only the standard of care TB case finding procedures and microscopy-based TB diagnostic algorithm are available during this phase.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xpert device
Interventions in the "Experimental phase" of this stepped-wedge trial include: (a) ensuring WHO-recommended TB screening adopted, (b) situating trained TB case finding nurses in the clinics, (c) training clinic personnel in the TB diagnostic algorithms, and (d) activation of the Xpert diagnostic device.
Intensified TB Case Finding (ICF)
Interventions in the active comparator phase of this stepped wedge trial only include: (a) adoption of the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (b) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in the 22 facilities; and (c) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. There is no Xpert device activation in this phase. Only the standard of care microscopy algorithm (smear microscopy and chest x-ray) are available during this phase.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients starting antiretroviral therapy at a study clinic in the 24 months before study start.
Exclusion Criteria
Retrospective cohort:
* Prisoners
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Botswana Ministry of Health
OTHER_GOV
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alyssa Finlay, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CDC Botswana
Tedd V Ellerbrock, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CDC Atlanta
Andrew F Auld, MBChB, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CDC Atlanta
Tefera Agizew, MD, MPhil
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CDC Botswana
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
22 HIV care and Treatment clinics in Botswana
Multiple Locations, Multiple, Botswana
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Auld AF, Fielding K, Agizew T, Maida A, Mathoma A, Boyd R, Date A, Pals SL, Bicego G, Liu Y, Shiraishi RW, Ehrenkranz P, Serumola C, Mathebula U, Alexander H, Charalambous S, Emerson C, Rankgoane-Pono G, Pono P, Finlay A, Shepherd JC, Holmes C, Ellerbrock TV, Grant AD. Risk scores for predicting early antiretroviral therapy mortality in sub-Saharan Africa to inform who needs intensification of care: a derivation and external validation cohort study. BMC Med. 2020 Nov 9;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01775-8.
Auld AF, Agizew T, Mathoma A, Boyd R, Date A, Pals SL, Serumola C, Mathebula U, Alexander H, Ellerbrock TV, Rankgoane-Pono G, Pono P, Shepherd JC, Fielding K, Grant AD, Finlay A. Effect of tuberculosis screening and retention interventions on early antiretroviral therapy mortality in Botswana: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. BMC Med. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1489-0.
Agizew T, Chihota V, Nyirenda S, Tedla Z, Auld AF, Mathebula U, Mathoma A, Boyd R, Date A, Pals SL, Lekone P, Finlay A. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes among people living with HIV diagnosed using Xpert MTB/RIF versus sputum-smear microscopy in Botswana: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4697-5.
Auld AF, Agizew T, Pals S, Finlay A, Ndwapi N, Boyd R, Alexander H, Mathoma A, Basotli J, Gwebe-Nyirenda S, Shepherd J, Ellerbrock TV, Date A. Implementation of a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate impact of Botswana's Xpert MTB/RIF diagnostic algorithm on TB diagnostic sensitivity and early antiretroviral therapy mortality. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 26;16(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1905-4.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Trial findings reported at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDC-CGH-6294
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.