The Utility of Intensified Case Finding Combined With a Package of Novel TB Diagnostics Using a Mobile Clinic in Africa
NCT ID: NCT01990274
Last Updated: 2015-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
875 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intensified case finding seeks to address this problem. Intensified case finding is a strategy to identify and treat people with TB who have not sought diagnostic services on their own initiative. By contrast, passive case finding is only able to identify people with TB presenting to health care facilities. In 2008 the WHO and Stop TB partnership identified intensified case-finding as one of four core TB prevention strategies necessary to meet the sixth Millennium Development Goal of halving the prevalence of TB by 2015. To date, a number of studies have illustrated the success of intensified case finding to increase case-detection rates (especially in HIV-infected populations) and to shorten time to diagnosis thereby limiting attendant morbidity and mortality.
Given both the importance and resource-intensive nature of intensified case finding it is essential that the optimal, operationally feasible and most cost-effective screening strategy be used. To date, screening strategies have varied widely across studies but all have used a combination of symptom screening, radiological (CXR) and microscopy-centre based laboratory diagnostics (smear microscopy and, if available and cost permitting, TB culture). This is a major shortcoming as it is now well established that these standard diagnostic tools perform sub-optimally especially in high HIV prevalent settings. With the recent development of a number of novel TB diagnostic tools with superior performance compared to conventional modalities, and the potential for point-of-care (POC) and point-of-treatment usage, it is imperative that intensified case-finding strategies be reviewed. The 2010 updated WHO "Guidelines for intensified tuberculosis case finding and isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV in resource constrained settings" recommends the use of a clinical algorithm for intensified case finding programmes for adults and adolescents living with HIV and it is important that the incremental diagnostic benefit together with the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of these novel TB diagnostic tools be assessed for use in intensified case finding programmes within the context of these updated guidelines.
In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time PCR in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of M.tb and RIF resistance. The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. GeneXpert has been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples (with a single Xpert test having a sensitivity of \~ 70% in smear-negative samples. A large demonstration study of Gene Xpert based at microscopy-centres is currently underway and preliminary data appear promising. However, GeneXpert technology has not been used as part of a screening strategy for intensified case finding and its operational feasible as a point-of-treatment diagnostic technology based in a mobile clinic has not yet been assessed.
In our recent review we have proposed urinary LAM as a useful "rule in" test for TB in HIV-infected subjects with advanced immune-suppression. Additionally, the recent development of a point-of-care urine LAM lateral flow strip test - the Determine TB® - with preliminary results suggesting equivalent performance to the LAM ELISA make it an appealing diagnostic for high HIV prevalence areas. A recent study has shown urine LAM to be more sensitive than smear-microscopy in an ARV clinic-based TB screening study. The use of the Determine TB® lateral flow strip test has not been studied as part of an intensified case finding strategy for population-based surveys. The Determine TB® lateral flow test will be used for screening of HIV-infected patients at point-of-care within the community and subsequent TB clinic referral for sputum-based diagnostics.
The XACT study has a randomised control study design to evaluate the impact of a package of novel TB diagnostic tools in the community using a mobile unit compared to standard intensive-case finding methods. The feasibility of performing new TB diagnostics at the point-of-care will be examined to determine if the proportion of patients identified, initiating, and completing TB treatment, is greater compared to the standard diagnostic arm. Further, the cost-effectiveness of TB cases detected and successfully completing treatment between study arms can also be investigated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Novel
Patients in this arm will receive 3 sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MGIT liquid TB culture.
GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Smear microscopy
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Standard
Patients in this arm will receive 2 sputum samples for fluorescence smear microscopy and MGIT liquid TB culture.
Smear microscopy
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Smear microscopy
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Provision of informed consent.
3. HIV-negative adults (older than 18 years) with 1 or more of the following:
* cough ≥ 2 weeks
* loss of weight
* persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
* a single recorded temp \> 38°C
* night sweats
* generalized fatigue
* hemoptysis or
* chest pain
4. Any HIV+ve adult (older than 18 years).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients self-presenting to the TB clinics.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zimbabwe
OTHER
Università degli Studi di Sassari
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
University of Cape Town
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Keertan Dheda
Professor and Head, Lung Infection and Immunity Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Keertan Dheda, MBChB, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cape Town
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Sassari
Sassari, , Italy
Radboud University
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Province, South Africa
University of Zimbabwe
Harare, , Zimbabwe
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Calligaro GL, Zijenah LS, Peter JG, Theron G, Buser V, McNerney R, Bara W, Bandason T, Govender U, Tomasicchio M, Smith L, Mayosi BM, Dheda K. Effect of new tuberculosis diagnostic technologies on community-based intensified case finding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):441-450. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30384-X. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
XACT website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XACT.2011.10800.003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id