Evaluating the Impact of Computer-assisted X-ray Diagnosis and Other Triage Tools to Optimise Xpert Orientated Community-based Active Case Finding for TB and COVID-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-23

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tuberculosis (TB) is now the commonest cause of death in many African countries. Globally, \~35% (almost 1 in 3) of TB cases are 'missed' (remain undiagnosed or undetected). In sub-Saharan Africa, 40-50% of the TB case burden remains undiagnosed within the community. These 'missed' TB cases (at primary care level) serve as a reservoir, which severely undermines TB control. With rapid advances in the development of TB screening tests, the investigators aim to determine the pragmatic utility of computer-assisted x-ray diagnosis (CAD). Recent data suggest that CAD performs on par with experienced radiologists to identify potential TB cases, hereby reducing the frequency at which Xpert tests are requested and helps to focus limited resources on the relevant cases. In addition, the investigators aim to test nascent screening technologies for TB diagnosis such as evaluating urine-based TB screening biosignatures. The COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged African peri-urban communities where TB is also common. With the pressing need to improve screening and diagnosis of COVID-19, the investigators plan to explore the potential for urine- and blood-based COVID-19 screening assays. Symptoms of COVID-19 and TB overlap, and limited affordability, as well as the stigma associated with both diseases, severely limits testing. Data are now urgently needed about the feasibility of co-screening and testing for TB and COVID-19. The utility of such an approach, if any, has not been studied in African communities.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Xpert Active Case-finding Trial 3 (XACT-3)

NCT04303104

Tuberculosis

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Xpert Active Case-finding Trial 2: Community-based Active Case-finding for Tuberculosis in South Africa

NCT03168945

Tuberculosis

COMPLETED NA

Diagnostic Accuracy of CAD4TB and C-reactive Protein Assay as Triage Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

NCT04666311

Pulmonary Tuberculosis Tuberculosis Diagnosis Covid-19 +1 more

COMPLETED

Tuberculosis Diagnostic Trial of CAD4TB Screening Alone Compared to CAD4TB Screening Combined With a CRP Triage Test, Both Followed by Confirmatory Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in Communities of Lesotho and South Africa

NCT05526885

Tuberculosis

COMPLETED NA

The Utility of Intensified Case Finding Combined With a Package of Novel TB Diagnostics Using a Mobile Clinic in Africa

NCT01990274

Tuberculosis

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tuberculosis (TB) is now the commonest cause of death in many African countries. Several factors drive this; however, transmission is the mechanism by which these risk factors translate into active TB. Globally, \~35% (almost 1 in 3) of TB cases are 'missed' (remain undiagnosed or undetected). In sub-Saharan Africa, 40-50% of the TB case burden remains undiagnosed within the community and \~30% of such cases are microscopically smear-positive. These 'missed' TB cases (at primary care level) serve as a reservoir, which severely undermines TB control. Thus, primary care and community-based case finding should be a critical component for TB control.

Detecting cases in the community, however, has been restricted by the lack of sensitive and user-friendly Point-of-Care (POC) diagnostic tools. To address this unmet need, in 2013 the investigators planned a programme of activities (sequential interlinked studies) with the overarching aim of optimising a model for Xpert-related community-based active case finding (ACF) for TB (XACT). By 2017, through the EDCTP-funded XACT-I study, the investigators solved the impasse of rapid POC diagnosis by showing that molecular Xpert-based community-based screening was effective in identifying missing TB cases in the peri-urban 'slums' of Cape Town and Harare using a mini-truck with a generator. However, such an approach was neither broadly affordable nor scalable. The investigators therefore derived a scalable model using portable battery-operated Xpert Edge installed within a low-cost (\< US$) 15 000 Nissan panel van manned by two health care workers (thus making the ACF model affordable and scalable). This completed study, XACT-II, screened over 5 000 participants in the community. The model worked well and was more effective than smear microscopy. Based on these successes, and to translate the XACT concept into policy, the Wellcome Trust and UK MRC has funded the XACT-III study. Currently commenced, XACT-III was initiated as a multi-country demonstration project in four sub-Saharan African countries.

More recently, there have been rapid advances in the development of triage testing for TB, which refers to screening tests that are generally applied in a community-based setting (either at individual community or primary care clinic level). These tests have very high sensitivity (\>95%) but modest specificity (\>70%) as defined by TB-specific target product profiles. A forerunner TB-orientated triage test is computer-assisted x-ray diagnosis (CAD). This entails using artificial intelligence-enabled software to read a digital x-ray and produce a probability of TB within seconds. Recent data suggest that CAD performs on par with experienced radiologists to identify potential TB cases, hereby reducing the frequency at which Xpert tests are requested and helps to focus limited resources on the relevant cases. Although these data appear promising, the feasibility of this strategy in a pragmatic field setting has not been extensively tested. There are several other unanswered questions. Is the strategy of CAD combined with Xpert cost-effective and can it reduce Xpert usage without missing an unacceptable number of TB cases? The investigators will therefore determine the utility of CAD as a triage tool to further optimise the XACT model.

The COVID-19 pandemic, due to SARS-CoV-2, has ravaged African peri-urban communities where TB is also common. Symptoms of COVID-19 and TB overlap, and limited affordability, as well as the stigma associated with both diseases, severely limits testing. Data are now urgently needed about the feasibility of co-screening and testing for TB and COVID-19. The utility of such an approach, if any, has not been studied in African communities. As Xpert POC TB testing and x-rays for CAD will be performed in the proposed study, it affords a unique and easy opportunity to seamlessly screen for both diseases when appropriate.

Other nascent screening technologies are rapidly emerging for TB and COVID-19, including urine- and blood-based triage tests. XACT-19 provides a unique opportunity to collect the relevant samples and test new technologies in a pragmatic community-based setting.

In summary, the XACT-19 study results will have substantial implications for public health policy and practice and will likely define a new standard for community-based ACF for TB, and potentially COVID-19 in tandem.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tuberculosis COVID-19 HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAD + POC Xpert

CAD followed by Xpert in CAD-positive participants (performed at POC) employing a low-cost panel van that is staffed by three health care workers. CAD-negative participants will be followed up, while CAD-positive participants will be offered POC Xpert. Xpert-positive participants will be referred for TB treatment initiation, while Xpert-negative (but CAD-positive) participants will undergo a clinical review. Thus, the active case finding (ACF) interventional package is one of CAD + POC Xpert (only in CAD positive participants).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL