POST-APPROVAL STUDY of TRANSCAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION in PATIENTS With SIGNIFICANT CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE

NCT ID: NCT02536378

Last Updated: 2020-07-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

692 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-23

Study Completion Date

2019-04-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ROADSTER 2 Study is intended to evaluate real world usage of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent when used with the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System by physicians of varying experience with the transcarotid technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carotid Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient must meet one of the following criteria regarding neurological symptom status and degree of stenosis:

Symptomatic: Stenosis must be \>50% as determined by an angiogram and the patient has a history of stroke (minor or non-disabling; NIHSS ≤4 or mRS ≤2), TIA and/or amaurosis fugax within 180 days of the procedure procedure ipsilateral to the carotid artery to be stented.

OR Asymptomatic: Stenosis must be \>80% as determined by angiogram without any neurological symptoms within the prior 180 days.
2. Target vessel must meet all requirements for ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System and ENROUTE Stent System (refer to IFU for requirements).
3. Patient has a discrete lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA).
4. Patient is ≥18 years of age.
5. Patient understands the nature of the procedure and has provided a signed informed consent using a form that has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site prior to the procedure. This will be obtained prior to participation in the study.
6. Patient is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and return to the treatment center for all required clinical evaluations.
7. Patient must have a life expectancy ≥ 3 years at the time of the index procedure without contingencies related to other medical, surgical or endovascular intervention.
8. Patient meets at least one of the surgical high-risk criteria listed below.


A. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion B. Tandem stenoses \>70% C. High cervical carotid artery stenosis D. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy E. Bilateral carotid artery stenosis requiring treatment within 30 days after index treatment.

F. Hostile Necks which the Investigator deems safe for transcarotid access including but not limited to:

I. Prior neck irradiation II. Radical neck dissection III. Cervical spine immobility


G. Patient is \> 75 years of age H. Patient has \> 2-vessel coronary artery disease and history of angina of any severity I. Patient has a history of angina

* Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class 3 or 4 or
* unstable angina

J. Patient has congestive heart failure (CHF) - New York Heart Association (NYHA)

* Functional Class III or IV

K. Patient has known severe left ventricular dysfunction

* LVEF \<30%.

L. Patient has had a myocardial infarction \> 72 hours and \< 6 weeks prior to procedure.

M. Patient has severe pulmonary disease (COPD) with either:

* FEV1 \<50% predicted or
* chronic oxygen therapy or
* resting PO2 of \<60 mmHg (room air)

N. Patient has permanent contralateral cranial nerve injury O. Patient has chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL).

REMINDER: The following is a list of anatomical considerations that are not suitable for transfemoral CAS with distal protection that are NOT contraindications for enrollment in the ROADSTER 2 Study including but not limited to:

I. TypeII, III, or Bovine arch II. Arch atheroma or calcification III. Atheroma of the great vessel origins IV. Tortuous distal ICA V. Tortuous or occluded iliofemoral segments VI. Occluded aortoiliac segments

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has an alternative source of cerebral embolus, including but not limited to:

1. Patient has chronic atrial fibrillation.
2. Patient has had any episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within the past 6 months, or history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation requiring chronic anticoagulation.
3. Knowledge of cardiac sources of emboli. e.g. left ventricular aneurysm, intracardiac filling defect, cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral prosthetic heart valve, calcific aortic stenosis, endocarditis, mitral stenosis, atrial septal defect, atrial septal aneurysm, or left atrial myxoma).
4. Recently (\<60 days) implanted heart valve (either surgically or endovascularly), which is a known source of emboli as confirmed on echocardiogram.
5. Abnormal angiographic findings: ipsilateral intracranial or extracranial arterial stenosis (as determined by angiography or CTA/MRA ≤ 6 months prior to index procedure) greater in severity than the lesion to be treated, cerebral aneurysm \> 5 mm, AVM (arteriovenous malformation) of the cerebral vasculature, or other abnormal angiographic findings.
2. Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months, or has had a recent (\<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
3. Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
4. Patient with a history of major stroke attributable to either carotid artery (CVA or retinal embolus) with major neurological deficit (NIHSS ≥ 5 OR mRS ≥ 3) likely to confound study endpoints within 1 month of index procedure.
5. Patient has an intracranial tumor.
6. Patient has an evolving stroke.
7. Patient has neurologic illnesses within the past two years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke, including but not limited to: moderate to severe dementia, partial or secondarily generalized seizures, complicated or classic migraine, tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions, subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions, intracranial infection, demyelinating disease, or intracranial hemorrhage).
8. Patient has had a TIA or amaurosis fugax within 48 hrs prior to the procedure.
9. Patient has an isolated hemisphere.
10. Patient had or will have CABG, endovascular stent procedure, valve intervention or vascular surgery within 30 days before or after the intervention.
11. Myocardial Infarction within 72 hours prior to the intervention.
12. Presence of a previous placed intravascular stent in target vessel or ipsilateral CCA or significant CCA inflow lesion.
13. Occlusion or \[Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Trial (TIMI 0)\] "string sign" \>1cm of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
14. An intraluminal filling defect (defined as an endoluminal lucency surrounded by contrast, seen in multiple angiographic projections, in the absence of angiographic evidence of calcification) whether or not it is associated with an ulcerated target lesion.
15. Ostium of Common Carotid Artery (CCA) requires revascularization.
16. Patient has an open stoma in the neck.
17. Female patients who are pregnant or may become pregnant.
18. Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or stent materials (refer to stent IFU), including aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, clopidogrel, statin or contrast media (that can't be pre medicated). Patients must be able to tolerate statins and a combination of ASA and ticlopidine or ASA and clopidogrel.
19. Patient must have a life expectancy \<3 years without contingencies related to other medical, surgical, or interventional procedures as per the Wallaert Score and patients with primary, recurrent or metastatic malignancy who do not have independent assessment of life expectancy performed by the treating oncologist or an appropriate specialist other than the physician performing TCAR.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Silk Road Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vikram Kashyap, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Case Medical Center Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute

Peter Schneider, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Permanente

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peter Morton UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Emory Healthcare

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente, Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Unity Point Health - Iowa Clinic

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Baptist Health Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Eastern Maine Medical Center

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

John Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Brighton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Michigan Vascular Center

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Ct.

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Sisters of Charity Hospital

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New Your Presbytarian - Weill Cornell

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook Medicine

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's University Health Network

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville Hospital System

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wellmont CVA Heart Institute

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Scott and White Memorial Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sentara Vascular Specialists

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CAMC Clinical Trials Center

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Technical University Munich

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Hospital Quirónsalud Marbella

Marbella, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alpaslan A, Wintermark M, Pinter L, Macdonald S, Ruedy R, Kolvenbach R. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal. J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28335706 (View on PubMed)

Chung J, Kumins NH, Smith J, Motaganahalli RL, Schneider PA, Kwolek CJ, Kashyap VS; ROADSTER Investigators. Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36563712 (View on PubMed)

Kashyap VS, So KL, Schneider PA, Rathore R, Pham T, Motaganahalli RL, Massop DW, Foteh MI, Eckstein HH, Jim J, Leal Lorenzo JI, Melton JG. One-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in the ROADSTER 2 trial. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):466-473.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.872. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35381327 (View on PubMed)

Kashyap VS, Schneider PA, Foteh M, Motaganahalli R, Shah R, Eckstein HH, Henao S, LaMuraglia G, Stoner MC, Melton J, Massop D, Hanover T, Titus J, Moore WS, Rodriguez-Carvajal R, Malas MB, Arko FR 3rd, Pierce D, Anain P, Oskin T; ROADSTER 2 Investigators*. Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease. Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2620-2629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030550. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32811386 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28335706

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal: The PROOF Study

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SRM-2015-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ReZolve2 Clinical Investigation
NCT01845311 COMPLETED NA
CREST-2 Long-term Observational Extension Study
NCT05465122 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Carotid With Bivalirudin Angioplasty
NCT00812383 COMPLETED PHASE2