Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1967 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-23
2022-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-approval Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Standard Risk Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease
NCT05365490
Clear-Road Trial, Investigating the Efficacy of the RoadSaver Stent
NCT02529345
EVA3S: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
NCT00190398
Evaluation of the Roadsaver Stent Used in Conjunction With the Nanoparasol Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Stenosis
NCT02657707
ROADSTER 3 Extended Follow-up Sub-Study
NCT06470815
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patient will be assessed in accordance with the hospital standard of care for patients treated with carotid artery stenting procedure, which in general includes:
* Informed consent for data collection
* Demographics
* Medical History
* Medication record
* Physical examination
* Carotid Duplex Ultrasound
* Neurological Assessment
* Diffusion weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI)
* Procedural angiography
Baseline assessments will be performed prior to the index procedure and documented in the patient medical record. Baseline assessments considered standard of care completed prior to obtaining informed consent do not need to be repeated unless the investigator feels it is medically necessary.
Neurological Assessment Baseline neurological assessment is recommended in this study and will be conducted by a physician, nurse, or other allied health professional, independent of the treating physician prior to the procedure. This assessment will include the neurological signs, symptoms, and the NIH Stroke Scale. For some pre-specified subgroups, imaging studies (Carotid Duplex Ultrasound and/or Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: DW-MRI) will be performed prior to the procedure.
2. Patient Enrollment Point A patient is considered enrolled in the study if there is full compliance with the study and RoadSaver IFU eligibility criteria, and only after successful guidewire passage through the study target lesion.
3. Medications Patients enrolled in this study will be pre-medicated according to the hospital routine practice.
4. Procedure The procedure will be performed according to the physician's standard of care. During the procedure, patients should receive appropriate anticoagulation and other therapy according to standard hospital practice. The use of any medication for the treatment of vessel spasm, patient agitation or discomfort, hypotension, arrhythmias, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure is at the discretion of the investigator.
Standard procedures should be followed based on the Instructions for Use for the Roadsaver™ device of Terumo. If pre- and/or post-dilatation is performed, or any other device (e.g. embolic protection devices, etc.) is used at the investigator's discretion.
4.1. Treatment Failures If a Roadsaver™ Carotid Stent is not implanted due to technical reasons, another CE-marked Carotid Stent may be used to complete the procedure. Patients who do not have a successful Roadsaver™ Carotid Stent implanted during the index procedure will be considered as technical failures.
Patients with technical failure will be followed only until discharge at which time they will have completed the study.
All patients who receive a Roadsaver™ Carotid Stent upon enrollment in the ROADSAVER study will be included in the analysis of clinical outcomes by the end of the study. Patients with technical failures will be analyzed separately only for procedural success and for in-hospital adverse events.
4.2. Device Deficiency and Device Malfunction A device deficiency is defined as an inadequacy of a medical device related to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance. This may include malfunctions, use error, or inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer.
A device malfunction is defined as failure of the medical device to perform in accordance with its intended purpose when used in accordance with the instructions for use or the Clinical Investigation Plan.
In case of device deficiency or malfunction, the device deficiency form in the eCRF should be completed and the investigator is asked to make every possible effort to return the device to Terumo Europe accompanied if possible with the packaging containing the device identification (lot number). Another Roadsaver™ Carotid Stent or another stent as per operators' discretion will be used in order to complete the treatment of the patient.
5. Post-procedure
Post-procedural evaluation should be done according to the routine hospital practice prior to discharge, which in general includes:
* Post Angiography immediately after the index procedure
* Physical examination before discharge
* MAE defined as the cumulative incidence of any periprocedural death or stroke
* Adverse events including: any revascularization, major vascular and bleeding complications, other
* Medication
* Neurological assessment when performed
* Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) when performed
Information on the post-procedural evaluation and any interventional treatment that occurred since the procedure should be collected.
6. Follow-Up Evaluations Patients will be followed according to routine hospital practice usually performed at 30-day and at 12-month assessment through hospital visit or through telephone contact. Investigators and research coordinators will keep notes of all telephone contacts with the patients in the patient hospital file as source documents.
Hospital Visit at 1 month (30 ± 7 days) and 12 months (365 ± 30 days) Patients' clinical status should be reported if hospital visits are done at 30 days and 12 months.
These follow-up assessments should be done according to the routine hospital practice, which in general includes:
* Physical examination
* Adverse events including: any stroke, any Revascularization, major vascular and bleeding complications, other
* Medication
* Neurological assessment
* Carotid duplex ultrasound
* Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI)
All relevant information obtained during follow-up including imaging should be reported. Data to be collected at follow-ups would include:
Telephone Contact at 12 months (365 ±30 days)
* Adverse Events including: any death (stroke related/other), any stroke, any revascularization, major vascular and bleeding complications, other
* Medication In case of death, stroke, TLR, and TVR all efforts should be made to provide sufficient baseline and event documentation.
Unscheduled Follow-Up
The assessment at unscheduled visits should be performed according to safety reporting requirements, which in general includes:
* Physical examination
* Adverse events including: any stroke, any revascularization, major vascular and bleeding complications, other
* Medication
* Neurological assessment
* Carotid duplex ultrasound
* Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI)
A patient who returns to the investigational site between pre-determined visits with an event related to the index procedure should be treated according to the physician's standard of care. Reportable events occurring during this period should be collected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Roadsaver
Dual layer micromesh Roadsaver carotid stent
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is at least 18 years of age
* The patient has a life expectancy of at least 12 months from the date of the index procedure
* The patient is able and willing to provide a signed IRB-/EC-approved informed consent form prior to participation
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Terumo Europe N.V.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OLV Ziekenhuis
Aalst, , Belgium
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden, , Belgium
AZ Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, , Belgium
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, , Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, , Czechia
Central Military Hospital Prague
Prague, , Czechia
GCS Centre de Cardiologie du Pays Basque
Bayonne, , France
Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Hopital de la Timone 2
Marseille, , France
Polyclinique Louis Pasteur Essey Les Nancy
Nancy, , France
Ihre-Radiologen.de
Berlin, , Germany
Sankt-Gertrauden Krankenhaus
Berlin, , Germany
Fürst-Stirum-Klinik
Bruchsal, , Germany
Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg Ev.-Luth. Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg
Flensburg, , Germany
Cardioangiological Center Bethanien
Frankfurt am Main, , Germany
SRK Karlsbad
Karlsbad, , Germany
Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim
Mannheim, , Germany
St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster
Münster, , Germany
Pius Hospital Oldenburg
Oldenburg, , Germany
Klinikum Passau
Passau, , Germany
Elblandklinikum Radebeul
Radebeul, , Germany
SRH Zentralklinikum Suhl
Suhl, , Germany
Universitäts und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Markusovszky Teaching Hospital
Budapest, , Hungary
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
Budapest, , Hungary
Moritz Kaposi Teaching Hospital
Kaposvár, , Hungary
Bacs-Kiskun County Hospital
Kecskemét, , Hungary
University of Pécs
Pécs, , Hungary
Szeged University Hospital
Szeged, , Hungary
Szent György Fejér County - University Teaching Hospital
Székesfehérvár, , Hungary
Paul Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga, , Latvia
UMC Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Sint-Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
City General Hospital 8th September Skopje
Skopje, , North Macedonia
University Clinic of Cardiology
Skopje, , North Macedonia
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr.2 im. Dr J. Biziela w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz, , Poland
Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Jana Pawła II
Krakow, , Poland
Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
Krakow, , Poland
Centro Hospitalar Vilanova Gaia/Espinho
Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal
Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, , Serbia
ICVD Dedinje
Belgrade, , Serbia
Clinical Center of Vojvodina
Novi Sad, , Serbia
Cinre S.R.O.
Bratislava, , Slovakia
Kardiocentrum Nitra
Nitra, , Slovakia
Hospital Universitario A Coruña
A Coruña, , Spain
Hospital Clinico de Barcelona
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Vall D'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Girona Josep Trueta
Girona, , Spain
Complejo Hospitalario De Jaen
Jaén, , Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Quironsalud Marbella
Marbella, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Donostia
San Sebastián, , Spain
Hospital universitario de Canarias
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, , Spain
Hospital Virgen de La Salud de Toledo
Toledo, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valladolid
Valladolid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Muller-Hulsbeck S, Vajda Z, Odrowaz-Pieniazek P, Ruzsa Z, Beelen R, Gjoreski A, Deloose K, Castro S, Faurie B, Tomasello Weitz A, Schwindt A, Latacz P, Orgaz Perez-Grueso A, Cvetic V, Langhoff R, Kedev S; all ROADSAVER study investigators. Contemporary carotid artery stenting practices and peri-procedural outcomes in different European countries: ROADSAVER study multicentric insights. CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Apr 12;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00528-z.
Kedev S, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Langhoff R. "Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)". Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03051-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T130E2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.