Post-approval Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Standard Risk Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease
NCT ID: NCT05365490
Last Updated: 2025-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
344 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-01
2025-07-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
POST-APPROVAL STUDY of TRANSCAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION in PATIENTS With SIGNIFICANT CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE
NCT02536378
ROADSTER 3 Extended Follow-up Sub-Study
NCT06470815
Prospective Single Arm CAS - ROADSAVER Study
NCT03504228
EVA3S: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
NCT00190398
Clear-Road Trial, Investigating the Efficacy of the RoadSaver Stent
NCT02529345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard-risk patients requiring carotid intervention
Symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with a discrete lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), who require carotid artery revascularization.
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR)
Carotid artery revascularization treated with the FDA-cleared ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS in conjunction with the FDA-approved ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR)
Carotid artery revascularization treated with the FDA-cleared ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS in conjunction with the FDA-approved ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient must meet one of the following criteria regarding neurological symptom status and degree of stenosis:
Symptomatic: ≥70% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery by ultrasound or ≥50% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery by angiogram
OR
Asymptomatic: ≥70% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery by ultrasound or ≥60% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery by angiogram
3. Target vessel must meet all requirements for ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System and ENROUTE Stent System (refer to IFU for requirements).
4. Patient is ≥18 and \<80 years of age.
5. Patient understands the nature of the procedure and has provided a signed informed consent using a form that has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site prior to the study procedure. This will be obtained prior to participation in the study.
6. Patient is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and return to the treatment center for all required clinical evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contralateral carotid artery occlusion
* Tandem stenoses in the ICA \>70% diameter reducing
* High cervical carotid artery stenosis above the C2 vertebra
* Restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy
* Bilateral carotid artery stenosis requiring treatment within 30 days after index procedure
* Hostile Necks including prior neck irradiation, radical neck dissection, and cervical spine immobility
* Patient is ≥80 years of age
* Patient has ≥2-vessel coronary artery disease (or has had revascularization procedure within the last 30 days) and/or angina
* Patient has history of unresolved angina - Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class 3 or 4 OR unstable angina
* Patient has congestive heart failure (CHF) - New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
* Patient has a known severe left ventricular dysfunction - LVEF \<30%
* Patient has had a myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to the procedure
* Patient has severe obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with either:
* FEVI \<50% predicted OR
* chronic oxygen therapy OR
* resting PO2 of ≤60 mmHG (room air)
* Patient has permanent contralateral cranial and/or laryngeal nerve injury
* Patient has chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL) or is on dialysis
2. Patient has an alternative source of cerebral embolus, including but not limited to:
1. Chronic atrial fibrillation.
2. Any episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within the past 6 months, or history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation requiring chronic anticoagulation.
3. Knowledge of cardiac sources of thrombus. (If patient has left ventricular aneurysm, intracardiac filling defect, cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral prosthetic heart valve, calcific aortic stenosis, endocarditis, mitral stenosis, atrial septal defect, atrial septal aneurysm, or left atrial myxoma AND there is no confirmed thrombus on an echocardiogram performed within 3 months prior to index procedure, the patient may be eligible for enrollment).
4. Recently implanted heart valve (either surgically or endovascularly) within 60 days prior to index procedure with confirmed emboli on echocardiogram.
5. Abnormal angiographic findings: ipsilateral intracranial or extracranial arterial stenosis (as determined by pre-procedure angiography or CTA/MRA ≤6 months prior to index procedure) greater in severity than the lesion to be treated, cerebral aneurysm \>5 mm, AVM (arteriovenous malformation) of the cerebral vasculature, or other abnormal angiographic findings.
3. Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months or has had a recent (\<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
4. Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
5. Patient with a history of major stroke prior to the TCAR procedure attributable to either carotid artery (CVA or retinal embolus) with major neurological deficit (NIHSS ≥5 OR mRS ≥3) likely to confound study endpoints 1 month after the TCAR procedure (because the deficit persists post-operatively).
6. Patient has an intracranial tumor.
7. Patient has an evolving stroke.
8. Patient has neurologic illnesses within the past 2 years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke, including but not limited to: moderate to severe dementia, partial or secondarily generalized seizures, complicated or classic migraine, tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions, subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions, intracranial infection, demyelinating disease, or intracranial hemorrhage.
9. Patient has had a TIA or amaurosis fugax within 48 hrs. prior to the procedure
10. Patient has an isolated hemisphere
11. Patient had or will have open heart (e.g., CABG), endovascular stent procedure, valve intervention, vascular surgery, other major operation within 30 days of the index procedure.
12. Presence of a previous placed intravascular stent in target vessel or ipsilateral CCA or significant CCA inflow lesion.
13. Occlusion or \[Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Trial (TIMI 0)\] "string sign" \>1cm of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
14. An intraluminal filling defect (defined as an endoluminal lucency surrounded by contrast, seen in multiple angiographic projections, in the absence of angiographic evidence of calcification) whether or not it is associated with an ulcerated target lesion.
15. Ostium of CCA requires revascularization.
16. Patient has an open stoma in the neck.
17. Female patients who are pregnant or may become pregnant.
18. Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or stent materials (refer to ENROUTE stent IFU), including aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, clopidogrel, statin or contrast media (that cannot be pre-medicated). Patients must be able to tolerate statins (or a permitted non-statin substitute) and a combination of ASA and ticlopidine or ASA and clopidogrel or alternative P2Y12 inhibitor..
19. Patient has a life expectancy \<5 years without contingencies related to other medical, surgical, or interventional procedures or is at High Risk as per the Wallaert Score. Estimation of life expectancy and scoring per the Wallaert Score is to be performed prior to enrollment.
20. Patient has primary, recurrent or metastatic malignancy and does not have independent assessment of life expectancy of ≥5 years performed by the treating oncologist or an appropriate specialist other than the physician performing TCAR.
21. Patient has an unresolved/uncorrected bleeding disorder.
22. Patient has a known allergy to nitinol
23. Patient is known to have an active SARS-CoV-2 infection (Coronavirus-19 \[COVID-19\]) or has been previously diagnosed with COVID-19 with neurological sequelae that could confound endpoint assessments (e.g., baseline mRS\>3).
18 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Silk Road Medical
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meghan Dermody, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lancaster General Hospital
Jeffrey Jim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Abbott Northwestern Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Marc Schermerhorn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Valley Vascular Consultants
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
HonorHealth
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Pima Heart & Vascular
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
La Jolla, California, United States
Sharp Grossmont
La Mesa, California, United States
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Los Angeles, California, United States
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Delray Medical Center
Delray Beach, Florida, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
AdventHealth Ocala
Ocala, Florida, United States
Coastal Vascular & Interventional
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Northside Vascular
Cumming, Georgia, United States
Alexian Brothers Medical Center
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
Carle Health
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Deaconess Research / Evansville Surgical Associates
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Baton Rouge General
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Acadiana Vascular Clinic / Our Lady Lourdes Heart Hospital
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
McLaren Heart & Vascular
Bay City, Michigan, United States
Corewell Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Abbott Northwestern
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
St. Luke's Hospital
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Midwest Aortic & Vascular Institute
North Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
New York University
New York, New York, United States
The Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Atrium Health
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Bethesda North Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
St. Charles Health System
Bend, Oregon, United States
Providence St. Vincent
Portland, Oregon, United States
St. Luke's University Hospital
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Pinnacle
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Lancaster General Hospital
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Stern Cardiovascular
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons
Austin, Texas, United States
Baylor Scott & White Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Memorial Hermann Southeast
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor Scott & White Plano
Plano, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Sugarland
Sugarland, Texas, United States
Sentara
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Carilion Roanoke Memorial
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC)
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Malas MB, Dakour-Aridi H, Kashyap VS, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Wang GJ, Motaganahalli RL, Cronenwett JL, Schermerhorn ML. TransCarotid Revascularization With Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative Surveillance Project. Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):398-403. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004496. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Schermerhorn ML, Liang P, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Cronenwett JL, Nolan BW, Kashyap VS, Wang GJ, Motaganahalli RL, Malas MB. Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis. JAMA. 2019 Dec 17;322(23):2313-2322. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18441.
Vilain KR, Magnuson EA, Li H, Clark WM, Begg RJ, Sam AD 2nd, Sternbergh WC 3rd, Weaver FA, Gray WA, Voeks JH, Brott TG, Cohen DJ; CREST Investigators. Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at standard surgical risk: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke. 2012 Sep;43(9):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661355. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SRM-2022-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.