Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

NCT ID: NCT00287573

Last Updated: 2010-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

488 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System as compared to brachytherapy in patients experiencing in-stent restenosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Percutaneous approaches to in-stent restenosis (ISR) have included balloon angioplasty alone, rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty, placement of a second stent or any combination thereof, and intra-coronary brachytherapy. Of these, only brachytherapy has been shown to reduce recurrent restenosis after PCI for ISR, - and is now considered the standard of care. Logistical considerations in establishing and maintaining a radiation program have limited the widespread availability of this modality. These considerations include the need for involvement of radiation oncologists, physicists, and safety officers; nuclear licensing requirements; need for increased shielding and safety training; equipment and procedural complexities; as well as increased procedural time and costs. Furthermore, recurrent ISR after brachytherapy may still occur. Stent based drug delivery for the treatment of ISR holds promise as a much simpler, safer and potentially more effective alternative to brachytherapy.

This is a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, multicenter, safety and efficacy trial for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The primary objective is to demonstrate a superior or non-inferior 9-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate for TAXUS-SR stent compared to intra-coronary brachytherapy (beta source).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Restenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAXUS Express2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System

Arm 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Brachytherapy (beta source)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Brachytherapy (beta source)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAXUS Express2

Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Brachytherapy (beta source)

Brachytherapy (beta source)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cumulative target lesion length is \</= 46 mm (visual estimate).
* Reference vessel diameter (RVD) is \>/= 2.5 and \</= 3.75 mm (visual estimate)
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is \>/= 25%

Exclusion Criteria

* Any previous or planned treatment with a non-study anti-restenotic drug-coated or drug-eluting coronary stent in the target vessel. (Note:previous or planned treatment with heparin or phosphorylcholine coated stents is acceptable, as long as, the procedure with the non-study stent meets the protocol defined criteria for non-target lesion interventions.)
* Previous or planned treatment with intra-coronary brachytherapy (gamma or beta source) in the target vessel
* Previous external radiotherapy to the heart or target vessel area
* Known genetic radiation sensitivity disorders (i.e. ataxia-telangiectasia, etc.)
* Side branch of the target lesion includes ostial narrowing \>/= 50% diameter stenosis (DS) and is \>/= 2.0 mm diameter
* Target lesion has been previously treated for ISR with the placement of a second stent(s), which covers \>/= 50% of the original stent length (a true "stent sandwich")
* Target vessel is pre-treated with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, or transluminal extraction catheter immediately prior to delivery of randomized treatment (stent placement or intra-coronary brachytherapy)
* Recent myocardial infarction (MI) (symptom onset \</= 72 hours prior to randomization)
* CK-MB \>2x the local laboratory's upper limit of normal (ULN) (refers to a measured value on the day of the index procedure as drawn per protocol)
* Anticipated treatment with warfarin during any period in the 6 months post index procedure
* Anticipated treatment with paclitaxel, oral rapamycin or colchicine during any period in the 9 months post index procedure
* Planned use of both the study stent and a non-study stent (i.e., commercial stent) in the treatment of the target lesion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Boston Scientific

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gregg W. Stone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Stephen G. Ellis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baptist Medical Center Princeton

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Scripps Green Hospital

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Mercy General Hospital

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora Denver Cardiology

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Clinic Foundation

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Washington Adventist Hospital

Takoma Park, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Lahey Clinic Hospital

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health Hospitals

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Northern Michigan

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Luke's Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Nebraska Heart Institute

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center/Capital Cardiovascular Associates

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Buffalo General Hospital

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Lenox Hill Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mid-Carolina Cardiology Research Division/Presbyterian Hospital

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forsyth Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Lindner Clinical Trial Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

North Ohio Research, Ltd

Elyria, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Cardiovascular Research Group

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's Medical Center

Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Miriam Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

South Carolina Heart Center

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

St. Thomas Hospital

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

South Austin Hospital/Capital Cardiovascular Specialists

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute in Cardiovascular Interventions

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Swedish Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, Martin SL, Satler L, McGarry T, Turco MA, Kereiakes DJ, Kelley L, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16531618 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAXUS V ISR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

S5442

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TAXUS PERSEUS Workhorse
NCT00484315 COMPLETED PHASE3