The REFLECT Trial: Cerebral Protection to Reduce Cerebral Embolic Lesions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT ID: NCT02536196
Last Updated: 2021-02-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
478 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in comparison with an active control group of patients undergoing unprotected TAVI.
Subjects with indications for TAVI and who meet study eligibility criteria will be randomized 2:1 to one of two treatment arms: 1) Intervention: Embolic protection device (TriGuard™) with transcatheter aortic valve implantation or 2) Control: Unprotected transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DEFLECT I: Keystone Heart Embolic Deflection Trial
NCT01448421
TraNsvenous TrIcuspid Valve ReplacemenT With LuX-Valve Plus System (TRINITY-US)
NCT06568003
"TARGET 2.0 Study": Safety and Performance of the Cardiovalve TR Replacement System
NCT07334691
Neuroprotection in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT02389894
The TRICURE EU Pivotal Study
NCT06581471
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase I In phase I, a total of 204 evaluable subjects and 54 roll-in subjects were enrolled at 26 total investigational sites in the United States, Europe, and Israel, of which 20 sites were in the United States. A minimum of 50% of subjects were planned to be enrolled at US sites, and no single site was permitted to enroll more than 20% of all subjects.
Subjects with indications for TAVI and who met study eligibility criteria were randomized 2:1 (stratified by study site) to one of two treatment arms:
* Intervention (Phase 1 Cohort) - TAVI with the TriGuard HDH CEPD
* Control - standard unprotected TAVI At sites where the investigator did not have prior experience with the TriGuard device (minimum of 2 prior cases), up to 3 roll-in subjects were enrolled. Roll-in subjects were not randomized, but underwent TAVI with the TriGuard HDH device. These cases were proctored by a Sponsor representative. Investigational sites with ≥2 prior TriGuard cases were allowed to enroll 1 roll-in subject at the discretion of the site principal investigator.
All subjects were to be followed clinically in-hospital and at 30 and 90 days, and to undergo diffusion-weighted MR imaging 2 to 5 days post-procedure, and neurologic and neuropsychological testing pre-procedure, post-procedure (2-5 days post-procedure), and at 30 and 90 days.
The initial randomized cohort expected to enroll up to 285 subjects. Note: Enrollment in Phase I has been halted after enrolling a total of 258 subjects (54 roll-ins and 204 randomized subjects including 63 controls) based on the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee following a review of interim 30-day data on 90 subjects at the prespecified interim analysis time point. A next iteration device designed for increased efficacy, ease of use, and improved safety will be tested in Phase II (below).
Phase II In Phase II, up to 295 randomized subjects and 40-50 roll-in subjects will be enrolled at up to 25 sites in the United States (inclusive of sites enrolling subjects in Phase I). No single site will be permitted to enroll more than 20% of all randomized subjects in Phase II.
Subjects with indications for TAVI and who meet study eligibility criteria will be randomized 2:1 (stratified by study site) to one of two treatment arms:
* Intervention - TAVI with the TriGUARD 3 CEPD
* Control - standard unprotected TAVI. Randomization will be stratified by implanted valve type (Medtronic vs. Edwards).
No single valve type will be implanted in more than approximately 70% of randomized patients (phase II).
Roll-in subjects (a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 Roll-ins per-site) will not be randomized, but will undergo TAVI with the TriGUARD 3 device. These cases will be proctored by a Sponsor representative.
All subjects will be followed clinically in-hospital and at 30 days, undergo diffusion-weighted MR imaging 2 to 5 days post-procedure, and undergo neurologic (NIHSS) testing pre-procedure, post-procedure (2-5 days post-procedure), and at 30 days. A follow-up phone-call to assess the occurrence of death or stroke will be done at 90 days.
The initial randomized cohort will consist of up to 225 subjects. After at least 50% of the initial randomized cohort (approximately 112 subjects) have reached the 30 day primary efficacy endpoint evaluation time point, a sample size reestimation will be performed in case the conditional power of the trial (assessed by the independent biostatistician) is \>40% but \<80%, subject to approval by the Sponsor. If this analysis determines that more than 225 randomized subjects will be required to ensure adequate study power, enrollment may continue until the required number of subjects have been enrolled, or until the total subject limit for the study has been reached (whichever occurs first).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Embolic Protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Embolic Protection Device
Embolic protection
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Control Arm
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without embolic protection
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Embolic Protection Device
Embolic protection
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The patient meets indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
3. The patient is willing to comply with protocol-specified follow-up evaluations
4. The patient, or legally authorized representative, has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC).
Potential Subjects will be excluded if ANY of the following criteria apply:
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via the transapical approach due to friable or mobile atherosclerotic plaque in the aortic arch
3. Patients with a previously implanted prosthetic aortic valve (i.e., planned valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI))
4. Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 14 days prior to index procedure per site standard test
5. Patients with known diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 72 hours preceding the index procedure (according to definition) or AMI \>72 hours preceding the index procedure, in whom Creatine Kinase (CK) and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of procedure, or patients who are currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new-onset AMI, such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain
6. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, patients who will refuse transfusion, or patients with an active peptic ulcer or history of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the prior 3 months
7. Patients with known mental or physical illness or known history of substance abuse that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy of less than one year
8. Patients with severe allergy or known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel, nitinol, stainless steel alloy, and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
9. Patients with a history of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the prior 6 months
10. Patients with renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min, calculated from serum creatinine by the Cockcroft-Gault formula)
11. Patients with hepatic failure (Child-Pugh class C)
12. Patients with hypercoagulable states that cannot be corrected by additional periprocedural heparin
13. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock at the time of the index procedure
14. Patients with severe peripheral arterial, abdominal aortic, or thoracic aortic disease that precludes delivery sheath vascular access
15. Patients in whom the aortic arch, innominate artery ostium, or proximal innominate artery is heavily calcified, severely atheromatous, or severely tortuous
16. Patients with an innominate artery ostium diameter \<10 mm or \>25 mm
17. Patients with a transverse aortic diameter \>43
18. Patients with anatomic irregularities of the innominate artery that could prevent positioning of the TriGuard upper stabilizer and compromise stability of the device
19. Patients with any other condition that would prevent adherence to the TriGuard HDH Instructions for Use
20. Patients with contraindication to cerebral MRI
21. Patients who have a planned treatment with any other investigational device or procedure during the study period
22. Patients planned to undergo any other cardiac surgical or interventional procedure (e.g., concurrent coronary revascularization) during the TAVI procedure or within 10 days prior to the TAVI procedure. NOTE: Diagnostic cardiac catheterization is permitted within 10 day prior to the TAVI procedure
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Keystone Heart
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine
San Diego, California, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Delray Medical Center
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Houma, Louisiana, United States
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
New York University
New York, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/NYPH
New York, New York, United States
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Baylor Heart and Vascular HospitalBaylor Heart and Vascular
Dallas, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor Research Center
Plano, Texas, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Bonn
Bonn, , Germany
Universitats-Herzzentrum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Hamburg Univeristy Cardiovascular Center
Hamburg, , Germany
Leipzig Heart Institute
Leipzig, , Germany
San Donato Hospital
Milan, , Italy
San Rafeele Hospital
Milan, , Italy
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lansky AJ, Grubman D, Dwyer MG 3rd, Zivadinov R, Parise H, Moses JW, Shah T, Pietras C, Tirziu D, Gambone L, Leon MB, Nazif TM, Messe SR. Clinical Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 20;84(8):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.055.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REFLECT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.