Running Slopes and Power Performance

NCT ID: NCT02514330

Last Updated: 2015-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of interval session running at high intensity with 1% or 10% gradient on the height of the drop jump. The cinematic variables concentric phase, eccentric and contact time were compared after the running session in both conditions in order to explain possible changes in the jump performance. The investigators theorize that the lower eccentric overload in the running to 10% inclination promotes higher deleterious effect on power performance of the lower limbs

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Physical training programs are typically composed of activities directed to the development of different valences usually stimulated in the same session. When aerobic activities of long duration prior isokinetic strength exercises, isotonic, or explosive, deleterious effects seem to be induced on performance of these valences. These short and long-term changes in muscle strength and power would be directly associated with repetitive eccentric loads that characterize the endurance running. Gradual increases in the running slope were inversely associated with a proportional reduction in the eccentric loads, which in turn would result in less muscle damage to intra and extrafusal fibers. So, the change in the slope of the race would emerge as an optional way to neutralize the competitive effect on the power performance. The research consisted of five visits. At the initial visit was conducted familiarization to vertical drop jump, and immediately after, the determination of VO2max values and their associated speed (vVO2max). The second visit was a new familiarization for the vertical drop jump followed immediately determining the Time to exhaustion performance in vVO2max (100% of VO2Max). Two jumps were performed on each of the three selected heights (20, 30 and 40 cm) were used in the experimental sessions and control only the height associated with the highest performance. In subsequent visits (third to fifth), participants performed three maximum jumps before and about 10 min after the following conditions: high intensity Interval running a 10% gradient (C10%), 1% grade (C1%) and control condition (CON).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interval Training at 1% incline

Procedure: Initial Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm), Six Stimulus of High Intensity Interval Training at 1% incline, Final Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interval Training at 1% incline

Intervention Type OTHER

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect

Interval Training at 10% incline

Procedure: Initial Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm), Six Stimulus of High Intensity Interval Training at 10% incline, Final Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interval Training at 10% incline

Intervention Type OTHER

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect.

Control

Procedure: Initial Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm), 20 min Rest, Final Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interval Training at 1% incline

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect

Intervention Type OTHER

Interval Training at 10% incline

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HIIT at 1% High Intensity Interval Training at 1% HIIT at 10% High Intensity Interval Training at 10%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age: 18 at 45 years
* no cardiovascular or metabolic problems
* minimum level of aerobic activity recommended by American College of Sports Medicine

Exclusion Criteria

* no joint or muscle injuries
* no use ergogenic or anabolic resources
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alberto Souza de Sá Filho

Doctorade in Mental Health

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tony Santos, Doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UGF 02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Running Related Injury Among Novice Runners
NCT02014987 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
Resisted Training in Runners
NCT06729138 RECRUITING NA