Linear Running Periodization x Nonlinear

NCT ID: NCT02498873

Last Updated: 2016-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a competitive scenario, trainers and coaches seek to improve the performance of their athletes organizing macrocycles (year), mesocycles (months), and microcycles (weeks) training aimed at a specific moment of a competition. The organization variables, mainly the intensity of exercise in a training routine can stimulate important physiological pathways and uphold superior gains to VO2max, leading to a peak aerobic performance. However, due to lack of evidence, and the difficulty of control on a large scale, the effects of the intensity organization over a mesocycle periodization are still poorly investigated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is compare two intensity blocks organization a) linear progression intensity (LP) and b) randomized or not intensity linaer (NLP) over five months running training, and a crossover design between subjects, on gains in VO2max, peak velocity (Vpeak) and critical power (CP). Furthermore, the relationship between the gains obtained with the training and the amount of exercise will be established. In our case all dependent variables will increase after training, with no significant differences between the two strategies on dependent variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Linear Periodization

Linear Periodization Running (Crossover Design)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non Linear Periodization

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Non Linear Periodization Running

Non Linear Periodization

Non Linear Periodization Running (Crossover Design)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Linear Periodization

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Linear Intensity Periodization Running

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Linear Periodization

Linear Intensity Periodization Running

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Non Linear Periodization

Non Linear Periodization Running

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LP Progressive Periodization NLP Randomized Intensity

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Minimum standards of physical activity proposed by the ACSM
* 18-45 years
* No metabolic or cardiovascular events
* No use ergogenic resources

Exclusion Criteria

* Sedentary
* Diagnosis of cardiac, pulmonary or diabetes type I or II
* No injuries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alberto Souza de Sá Filho

Doctorade in Mental Health

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sérgio Machado, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UNIVERSO-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.