Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence After Hip Fracture

NCT ID: NCT02507505

Last Updated: 2024-05-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1848 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2022-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find out if two types of standard care anesthesia are the same or if one is better for people who have hip fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hip fracture is a clinical condition that involves a break in the femur (hip bone) near where it attaches to the pelvis. Hip fractures occur more than 300,000 times each year in the US and over 1.6 million times each year worldwide.

Over 90% of hip fractures occur in individuals aged 50 or older, most commonly resulting from low-energy traumatic injuries, such as falls from standing in the context of established osteoporosis, chronic illness, or disability. Surgical treatment, via fixation of the fractured bone or partial or total replacement of the hip joint, is indicated for all types of hip fractures and approximately 95% of hip fracture patients undergo surgery.

No evidence-based interventions now exist to improve functional outcomes after hip fracture surgery beyond the immediate postoperative period. Nearly all hip fracture patients require orthopedic surgery and anesthesia, making the anesthetic care episode a major opportunity to impact outcomes.

Spinal and general anesthesia represent the two standard care approaches to anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Basic and clinical research has identified multiple plausible mechanisms by which spinal anesthesia may improve outcomes after hip fracture; nonetheless, major guidelines and systematic reviews have identified key evidence gaps and anesthesia care for hip fracture varies markedly in practice. While spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture have been previously compared in retrospective studies and small randomized trials, much of the available prospective trial data is old and may not be reflective of current clinical practice.

REGAIN will be the first pragmatic multicenter prospective randomized trial of spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery designed to evaluate the association of anesthesia technique with functional recovery after hip fracture. As such, it will fill critical evidence gaps to inform policy and practice.

Approximately 2,424 subjects will be enrolled (i.e. informed consent for participation will be obtained) in order to yield approximately 1,600 randomized patients. This estimate is based on an assumption that one in three patients (33%) who undergo consent prior to surgery will not be randomized on the day of surgery due to active clinical issues, timing of medication dosing, clinical assessments by treating physicians or the site Clinical Director or their designate, or patient withdrawal of consent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regional Anesthesia

Approximately half of the subjects will be randomized to the arm which receives Regional Anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Regional Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Regional anesthesia involves temporarily numbing parts of the body with nerve blocks. Spinal anesthesia is a type of regional anesthesia that uses medications injected into the fluid surrounding the spinal cord to temporarily numb the legs and lower abdomen. Spinal anesthesia is the most widely used type of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. While intravenous sedation is typically used for comfort with spinal anesthesia, invasive airway interventions are not typically required.

General Anesthesia

Approximately half of the subjects will be randomized to the arm which receives General Anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

General Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General anesthesia uses injected or inhaled medications to keep people unconscious during surgery. Since general anesthesia depresses breathing and impairs protective airway reflexes, invasive airway interventions such as breathing tube placement and mechanical ventilation are usually required.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regional Anesthesia

Regional anesthesia involves temporarily numbing parts of the body with nerve blocks. Spinal anesthesia is a type of regional anesthesia that uses medications injected into the fluid surrounding the spinal cord to temporarily numb the legs and lower abdomen. Spinal anesthesia is the most widely used type of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. While intravenous sedation is typically used for comfort with spinal anesthesia, invasive airway interventions are not typically required.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General Anesthesia

General anesthesia uses injected or inhaled medications to keep people unconscious during surgery. Since general anesthesia depresses breathing and impairs protective airway reflexes, invasive airway interventions such as breathing tube placement and mechanical ventilation are usually required.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Regional Block or Spinal Block General Endotracheal Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinically or radiographically diagnosed intracapsular or extracapsular hip fracture
* Planned surgical treatment via hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty or appropriate fixation procedure
* Ability to walk 10 feet or across a room without human assistance before fracture

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned concurrent surgery not amenable to spinal anesthesia
* Absolute contraindications to spinal anesthesia
* Periprosthetic fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark D Neuman, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of California Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Yale School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Christiana Care Health Services

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

University of Florida Gainesville

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Florida Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cooper University Hospital

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Englewood Hospital and Medical Center

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Maimonides Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

NYU-Winthrop Hospital

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sacred Heart at RiverBend

Springfield, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Temple University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny Health Network

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading Hospital

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University Medical Center Brackenridge and Seton Medical Center Williamson

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Vermont Medical Center

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Inova Fairfax Medical Campus

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Simon Fraser Orthopaedic Fund - Royal Columbian Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Dalhousie University

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clapp JT, Dinh C, Hsu M, Neuman MD. Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study. Trials. 2023 Jun 27;24(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07445-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37365614 (View on PubMed)

Neuman MD, Feng R, Ellenberg SS, Sieber F, Sessler DI, Magaziner J, Elkassabany N, Schwenk ES, Dillane D, Marcantonio ER, Menio D, Ayad S, Hassan M, Stone T, Papp S, Donegan D, Marshall M, Jaffe JD, Luke C, Sharma B, Azim S, Hymes R, Chin KJ, Sheppard R, Perlman B, Sappenfield J, Hauck E, Hoeft MA, Tierney A, Gaskins LJ, Horan AD, Brown T, Dattilo J, Carson JL; REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) Investigators*; Looke T, Bent S, Franco-Mora A, Hedrick P, Newbern M, Tadros R, Pealer K, Vlassakov K, Buckley C, Gavin L, Gorbatov S, Gosnell J, Steen T, Vafai A, Zeballos J, Hruslinski J, Cardenas L, Berry A, Getchell J, Quercetti N, Bajracharya G, Billow D, Bloomfield M, Cuko E, Elyaderani MK, Hampton R, Honar H, Khoshknabi D, Kim D, Krahe D, Lew MM, Maheshwer CB, Niazi A, Saha P, Salih A, de Swart RJ, Volio A, Bolkus K, DeAngelis M, Dodson G, Gerritsen J, McEniry B, Mitrev L, Kwofie MK, Belliveau A, Bonazza F, Lloyd V, Panek I, Dabiri J, Chavez C, Craig J, Davidson T, Dietrichs C, Fleetwood C, Foley M, Getto C, Hailes S, Hermes S, Hooper A, Koener G, Kohls K, Law L, Lipp A, Losey A, Nelson W, Nieto M, Rogers P, Rutman S, Scales G, Sebastian B, Stanciu T, Lobel G, Giampiccolo M, Herman D, Kaufman M, Murphy B, Pau C, Puzio T, Veselsky M, Apostle K, Boyer D, Fan BC, Lee S, Lemke M, Merchant R, Moola F, Payne K, Perey B, Viskontas D, Poler M, D'Antonio P, O'Neill G, Abdullah A, Fish-Fuhrmann J, Giska M, Fidkowski C, Guthrie ST, Hakeos W, Hayes L, Hoegler J, Nowak K, Beck J, Cuff J, Gaski G, Haaser S, Holzman M, Malekzadeh AS, Ramsey L, Schulman J, Schwartzbach C, Azefor T, Davani A, Jaberi M, Masear C, Haider SB, Chungu C, Ebrahimi A, Fikry K, Marcantonio A, Shelvan A, Sanders D, Clarke C, Lawendy A, Schwartz G, Garg M, Kim J, Caruci J, Commeh E, Cuevas R, Cuff G, Franco L, Furgiuele D, Giuca M, Allman M, Barzideh O, Cossaro J, D'Arduini A, Farhi A, Gould J, Kafel J, Patel A, Peller A, Reshef H, Safur M, Toscano F, Tedore T, Akerman M, Brumberger E, Clark S, Friedlander R, Jegarl A, Lane J, Lyden JP, Mehta N, Murrell MT, Painter N, Ricci W, Sbrollini K, Sharma R, Steel PAD, Steinkamp M, Weinberg R, Wellman DS, Nader A, Fitzgerald P, Ritz M, Bryson G, Craig A, Farhat C, Gammon B, Gofton W, Harris N, Lalonde K, Liew A, Meulenkamp B, Sonnenburg K, Wai E, Wilkin G, Troxell K, Alderfer ME, Brannen J, Cupitt C, Gerhart S, McLin R, Sheidy J, Yurick K, Chen F, Dragert K, Kiss G, Malveaux H, McCloskey D, Mellender S, Mungekar SS, Noveck H, Sagebien C, Biby L, McKelvy G, Richards A, Abola R, Ayala B, Halper D, Mavarez A, Rizwan S, Choi S, Awad I, Flynn B, Henry P, Jenkinson R, Kaustov L, Lappin E, McHardy P, Singh A, Donnelly J, Gonzalez M, Haydel C, Livelsberger J, Pazionis T, Slattery B, Vazquez-Trejo M, Baratta J, Cirullo M, Deiling B, Deschamps L, Glick M, Katz D, Krieg J, Lessin J, Mojica J, Torjman M, Jin R, Salpeter MJ, Powell M, Simmons J, Lawson P, Kukreja P, Graves S, Sturdivant A, Bryant A, Crump SJ, Verrier M, Green J, Menon M, Applegate R, Arias A, Pineiro N, Uppington J, Wolinsky P, Gunnett A, Hagen J, Harris S, Hollen K, Holloway B, Horodyski MB, Pogue T, Ramani R, Smith C, Woods A, Warrick M, Flynn K, Mongan P, Ranganath Y, Fernholz S, Ingersoll-Weng E, Marian A, Seering M, Sibenaller Z, Stout L, Wagner A, Walter A, Wong C, Orwig D, Goud M, Helker C, Mezenghie L, Montgomery B, Preston P, Schwartz JS, Weber R, Fleisher LA, Mehta S, Stephens-Shields AJ, Dinh C, Chelly JE, Goel S, Goncz W, Kawabe T, Khetarpal S, Monroe A, Shick V, Breidenstein M, Dominick T, Friend A, Mathews D, Lennertz R, Sanders R, Akere H, Balweg T, Bo A, Doro C, Goodspeed D, Lang G, Parker M, Rettammel A, Roth M, White M, Whiting P, Allen BFS, Baker T, Craven D, McEvoy M, Turnbo T, Kates S, Morgan M, Willoughby T, Weigel W, Auyong D, Fox E, Welsh T, Cusson B, Dobson S, Edwards C, Harris L, Henshaw D, Johnson K, McKinney G, Miller S, Reynolds J, Segal BS, Turner J, VanEenenaam D, Weller R, Lei J, Treggiari M, Akhtar S, Blessing M, Johnson C, Kampp M, Kunze K, O'Connor M, Looke T, Tadros R, Vlassakov K, Cardenas L, Bolkus K, Mitrev L, Kwofie MK, Dabiri J, Lobel G, Poler M, Giska M, Sanders D, Schwartz G, Giuca M, Tedore T, Nader A, Bryson G, Troxell K, Kiss G, Choi S, Powell M, Applegate R, Warrick M, Ranganath Y, Chelly JE, Lennertz R, Sanders R, Allen BFS, Kates S, Weigel W, Li J, Wijeysundera DN, Kheterpal S, Moore RH, Smith AK, Tosi LL, Looke T, Mehta S, Fleisher L, Hruslinski J, Ramsey L, Langlois C, Mezenghie L, Montgomery B, Oduwole S, Rose T; REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) Investigators. Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):952-960. doi: 10.7326/M22-0320. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35696684 (View on PubMed)

Neuman MD, Feng R, Carson JL, Gaskins LJ, Dillane D, Sessler DI, Sieber F, Magaziner J, Marcantonio ER, Mehta S, Menio D, Ayad S, Stone T, Papp S, Schwenk ES, Elkassabany N, Marshall M, Jaffe JD, Luke C, Sharma B, Azim S, Hymes RA, Chin KJ, Sheppard R, Perlman B, Sappenfield J, Hauck E, Hoeft MA, Giska M, Ranganath Y, Tedore T, Choi S, Li J, Kwofie MK, Nader A, Sanders RD, Allen BFS, Vlassakov K, Kates S, Fleisher LA, Dattilo J, Tierney A, Stephens-Shields AJ, Ellenberg SS; REGAIN Investigators. Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2025-2035. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34623788 (View on PubMed)

Neuman MD, Gaskins LJ, Ziolek T; REGAIN Investigators. Time to institutional review board approval with local versus central review in a multicenter pragmatic trial. Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):107-111. doi: 10.1177/1740774517735536. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28982261 (View on PubMed)

Neuman MD, Ellenberg SS, Sieber FE, Magaziner JS, Feng R, Carson JL; REGAIN Investigators. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture (REGAIN): protocol for a pragmatic, international multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 15;6(11):e013473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013473.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27852723 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCORI-1406-18876

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

822632

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Stronger at Home Study
NCT04228068 COMPLETED NA