ASSIP, Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program. Two Year Follow-Up Study
NCT ID: NCT02505373
Last Updated: 2016-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Attempted suicide is the main risk factor for repeated suicidal behavior. However, evidence of the effectiveness of follow-up treatments for these patients is limited. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP), a novel brief therapy based on a patient-oriented model of suicidal behavior. The ASSIP consists of three sessions followed by regular letters for 24 months.
Method
In this treatment study, 120 patients were randomly assigned to either the ASSIP intervention or a control group that received a one-session clinical assessment. Both groups received in- and outpatient treatment as usual. Study participants also completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months during a 24-month follow-up period.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Differences Between Suicide Attempters and Suicide Ideators. Influence of the Brief Therapy Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) on Neuropsychological Correlates and Psychological Process Factors - Project 2
NCT06263712
Differences Between Suicide Attempters and Suicide Ideators. Influence of the Brief Therapy Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) on Neuropsychological Correlates and Psychological Process Factors - Project 3
NCT06322199
Randomized Suicide Prevention Trial Using ASSIP and ACT in Suicide Attempters
NCT07132099
Establishing Efficacy of an Inpatient Intervention and Phone App to Reduce Suicidal Risk
NCT03825588
Safety Planning Intervention to Reduce Short Term Risk
NCT03227991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the prevention and treatment of suicidality the main emphasis according to the traditional medical model has been on diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, first and foremost depression. However, it is debatable how far this approach toward the suicidal patient can actually affect suicide rates. It has been argued that the mechanisms of suicidal behavior should be studied independently of any associated psychiatric disorder.
Follow-up studies strongly suggest that when a person has attempted suicide, the risk of future suicidal behavior, including death by suicide, cannot be "cured". Once a person has tried to solve an emotional crisis with a suicide attempt, this behavioral pattern will quickly re-emerge in similar situations in the future, not only because a suicide attempt provides a - temporary - solution, but also because very often it associated with an immediate sense of relief. The prevailing view emerging from recent developments in suicide research is that, following attempted suicide, it is crucial to establish individual safety strategies with patients for coping differently in future emotional crises. For as many patients as possible to benefit, treatments targeting suicidality should be brief and focused, and, of course, effective.
ASSIP combines aspects of action theory, cognitive behavior therapy, and attachment theory. A fundamental assumption is that an action theoretical approach toward the suicidal patient will establish a therapeutic alliance in the sense of a "secure base", which will enhance the effect of the regular letters following the four treatment sessions. ASSIP is not a stand-alone therapy but should be offered to suicidal patients in addition to the usual clinical management and follow-up treatment.
Objective
1. How effective is ASSIP, compared to a control group in preventing suicidal behaviour after a suicide attempt?
1. Primary outcome measures: Suicidal behaviour, suicidal ideation
2. Secondary outcome measures: Depression, coping skills, contact to health care system
2. Which parameters have a moderating influence on outcome measures?
1. Therapeutic alliance
2. Diagnosis
3. Previous suicide attempts
Methods
In this treatment study, 120 patients were randomly assigned to either the ASSIP intervention or a control group that received a one-session clinical assessment. Both groups received in- and outpatient treatment as usual. The quality of the therapeutic alliance as a moderating factor for outcome was measured at the therapy sessions 1 (both groups) and 3 (ASSIP group only) using the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq). Regarding outcome measures the study participants completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months during a 24-months follow-up period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group ASSIP
Intervention Group ASSIP (Brief Therapy)
Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP)
The brief therapy ASSIP consists of three to four sessions, which are ideally administered within a period of 2 to 4 weeks. Therapy sessions are scheduled for 60 to 90 minutes.
Session 1: A narrative interview is conducted, in which the patient is asked to tell his or her personal story which led to the suicidal crisis. The narrative is video-recorded.
Session 2: Using video-playback of the recorded narrative, patient and therapist explore further details of the suicidal process.
Session 3: A case conceptualization focusing on the patient's vulnerability and the trigger of the suicidal crisis is formulated in writing. A list of safety strategies for the prevention of future suicidal behaviour is developed jointly with the patient.
Regular letters are sent to patients over a period of 2 years.
Control Group CG
Control Group CG (structured interview)
Control Group (CG)
Participants assigned to the control group underwent a single clinical interview that included a structured assessment of suicide using the SSF (Jobes, 2006).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP)
The brief therapy ASSIP consists of three to four sessions, which are ideally administered within a period of 2 to 4 weeks. Therapy sessions are scheduled for 60 to 90 minutes.
Session 1: A narrative interview is conducted, in which the patient is asked to tell his or her personal story which led to the suicidal crisis. The narrative is video-recorded.
Session 2: Using video-playback of the recorded narrative, patient and therapist explore further details of the suicidal process.
Session 3: A case conceptualization focusing on the patient's vulnerability and the trigger of the suicidal crisis is formulated in writing. A list of safety strategies for the prevention of future suicidal behaviour is developed jointly with the patient.
Regular letters are sent to patients over a period of 2 years.
Control Group (CG)
Participants assigned to the control group underwent a single clinical interview that included a structured assessment of suicide using the SSF (Jobes, 2006).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Inpatient/outpatient, day care treatment
* German language
* All diagnosis (except: psychosis)
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Imprisonment
* Foreign languages
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Konrad Michel, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern
Anja C Gysin-Maillart, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alexander, L. B. & Luborsky, L. (1986).The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsoff (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325-366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Arensman E, Townsend E, Hawton K, Bremner S, Feldman E, Goldney R, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Van Heeringen K, House A, Owens D, Sakinofsky I, Traskman-Bendz L. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatment of patients following deliberate self-harm: the methodological issues involved in evaluating effectiveness. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001 Summer;31(2):169-80. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.2.169.21516.
Beck, A. T. & Steer, R. A. (1987). BDI, Beck depression inventory: manual. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T. & Steer, R. A. (1991). Manual for the Beck scale for suicide ideation. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Brown GK, Ten Have T, Henriques GR, Xie SX, Hollander JE, Beck AT. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Aug 3;294(5):563-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.5.563.
Carter GL, Clover K, Whyte IM, Dawson AH, D'Este C. Postcards from the EDge: 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial for hospital-treated self-poisoning. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 May;202(5):372-80. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112664. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
Claassen CA, Pearson JL, Khodyakov D, Satow PM, Gebbia R, Berman AL, Reidenberg DJ, Feldman S, Molock S, Carras MC, Lento RM, Sherrill J, Pringle B, Dalal S, Insel TR. Reducing the burden of suicide in the U.S.: the aspirational research goals of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention Research Prioritization Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
Granboulan V, Roudot-Thoraval F, Lemerle S, Alvin P. Predictive factors of post-discharge follow-up care among adolescent suicide attempters. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001 Jul;104(1):31-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00297.x.
Gysin-Maillart, A. & Michel, K. (2013). Kurztherapie nach Suizidversuch. ASSIP-Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program. Therapiemanual. Bern: Huber. ISBN: 9783456852386
Hatcher S, Sharon C, Coggan C. Beyond randomized controlled trials in attempted suicide research. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Aug;39(4):396-407. doi: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.4.396.
Jobes DA. Collaborating to prevent suicide: a clinical-research perspective. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2000 Spring;30(1):8-17.
Monti, K., Cedereke, M. & Ojehagen, A. (2003). Treatment attendance and suicidal behavior 1 month and 3 months after a suicide attempt: A comparison between two samples. Archives of Suicide Research, 7, 167-174. http://doi.org/10.1080/13811110301581
Michel, K. & Valach, L. (1997). Suicide as goal-directed action. Archives of Suicide Research, 3, 213-221. http://doi.org/10.1080/13811119708258273
Michel K, Dey P, Stadler K, Valach L. Therapist sensitivity towards emotional life-career issues and the working alliance with suicide attempters. Arch Suicide Res. 2004;8(3):203-13. doi: 10.1080/13811110490436792.
Michel K, Maltsberger JT, Jobes DA, Leenaars AA, Orbach I, Stadler K, Dey P, Young RA, Valach L. Discovering the truth in attempted suicide. Am J Psychother. 2002;56(3):424-37. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2002.56.3.424.
Michel, K. & Gysin-Maillart, A. (2015). Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program ASSIP. A manual for clinicians. Göttingen: Hogrefe. ISBN: 978-0-88937-476-8
Motto JA, Bostrom AG. A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jun;52(6):828-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.828.
Rudd MD, Bryan CJ, Wertenberger EG, Peterson AL, Young-McCaughan S, Mintz J, Williams SR, Arne KA, Breitbach J, Delano K, Wilkinson E, Bruce TO. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015 May;172(5):441-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Rudd MD. The suicidal mode: a cognitive-behavioral model of suicidality. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2000 Spring;30(1):18-33.
Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O'carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the tower of Babel: a revised nomenclature for the study of suicide and suicidal behaviors. Part 2: Suicide-related ideations, communications, and behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Jun;37(3):264-77. doi: 10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.264. No abstract available.
Stanley, B. & Brown, G. K. (2012). Safety planning intervention: A brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19, 256-264. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.01.001
Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 31;300(22):1242-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197905313002203.
Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.
Gibbon S, Khalifa NR, Cheung NH, Vollm BA, McCarthy L. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 3;9(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3.
Park AL, Gysin-Maillart A, Muller TJ, Exadaktylos A, Michel K. Cost-effectiveness of a Brief Structured Intervention Program Aimed at Preventing Repeat Suicide Attempts Among Those Who Previously Attempted Suicide: A Secondary Analysis of the ASSIP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183680. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3680.
Gysin-Maillart A, Schwab S, Soravia L, Megert M, Michel K. A Novel Brief Therapy for Patients Who Attempt Suicide: A 24-months Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Study of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP). PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 1;13(3):e1001968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001968. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
144/08
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.