Bacterial Contamination in Transrectal Hybrid NOTES Sigmoidectomy
NCT ID: NCT02500992
Last Updated: 2015-07-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Still an open question is the risk of intraperitoneal contamination as in this procedure the colon has to be opened. This is the case for (a) retrieval of the specimen thru the opened rectal stump and (b) for intracorporeal insertion of the anvil of the circular stapler in order to fashion an anastomosis.
In this study the bacterial contamination in the rectal stump as well as in the peritoneal cavity is assessed. The results are compared to bacteriological samples taken in a comparison group consisting of conventional laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility, Safety and Outcome of Transrectal Hybrid-NOTES Anterior Resection
NCT01992406
Comparison of Fissurectomy to Fissurectomy With Anoplasty
NCT04911023
Endosonograpic Monitoring of Injury to the Anal Sphincter After Transanal Stapled Anastomosis
NCT05992948
Study "HEMORROIDAL SURGERY AND Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease"
NCT04692194
HEmorrhoidAl Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
NCT06638814
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transrectal sigmoidectomy
Patients undergoing transrectal NOTES sigmoidectomy
Transrectal sigmoidectomy
Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy
Patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transrectal sigmoidectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Status post contained diverticulitis
Exclusion Criteria
* \<18 years of age
* pregnancy
* emergency operation
* acute diverticulitis
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cantonal Hosptal, Baselland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Steinemann, MD
Consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz
Bruderholz, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NoBakt transrectal
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.