Modified Perineal Linear Stapler Resection for External Rectal Prolapse: a Novel Approach

NCT ID: NCT04184310

Last Updated: 2019-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-05

Study Completion Date

2019-06-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

from December 2016 to July 2019, 36 elderly co-morbid patients with rectal prolapse were involved in this study which is performed in the GIT surgery unit of Zagazig University Hospital. the investigators used a modified linear stapler resection technique for the rectal prolapse. Postoperative follow up was done for one year to evaluate functional outcome, operative time, hospital stay and complications

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was done in the GIT Unit of the General Surgery Department of Zagazig University Hospital in the period from December 2016 to July 2019. The hospital Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol. Thirty-six old, co-morbid and short life expectancy patients were included in the sample. They were evaluated for PSP. Informed consent was signed by all patients or first-degree relatives after full discussion of the advantage and disadvantage of the operation. Preoperative bimanual examination was done for rectal prolapse to rule out enterocele or cystocele and this was confirmed by MRI. The routine preoperative evaluation was done for all patients (physical examination, complete blood tests, ECG and chest x-ray). Bowel preparation was done for all patients.

Regarding bowel function, all patients were evaluated for fecal incontinence by Wexner score and for constipation by Rome II criteria. Prophylactic intravenous cephalosporin and metronidazole was given one hour before operation. The operation was done under spinal anesthesia in the lithotomy position with slight Trendeleburg to prevent trapping of abdominal organs between walls of rectum. All operations were done by the same surgical members of the unit. Hospital stay, Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. All patients started oral fluids in the second day. Follow up was done for patients every 1,3,6,9 and 12 months in the outpatient clinic.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

old patient with rectal prolapse

old co-morbid patient with complete rectal prolapse unfit for abdominal operation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Modified perineal linear stapler resection for external rectal prolapse

Intervention Type OTHER

After anesthesia and patient position, the prolapse was pulled out Two vertical incision were made in both the inner and outer walls of the prolapse (at 3and 9 o'clock)1-2 cm in size approximately 2 cm above the dentate line. We used a reloadable linear cutter stapler (GIA 100mm Covidien, Mansfield, Mass., USA) passing through the tunnel to cut the anterior aspect of the prolapse . Then, after reload the stapler by the new cartridge, we used it to do the same for posterior wall and the prolapsed rectum was completely transected . We ensure that the stapler did not fire at the dentate line to avoid post-operative pain. Multiple 3-0 PDS intermittent full thickness sutures were done for hemostasis. The prolapsed rectum falls back into place spontaneously.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modified perineal linear stapler resection for external rectal prolapse

After anesthesia and patient position, the prolapse was pulled out Two vertical incision were made in both the inner and outer walls of the prolapse (at 3and 9 o'clock)1-2 cm in size approximately 2 cm above the dentate line. We used a reloadable linear cutter stapler (GIA 100mm Covidien, Mansfield, Mass., USA) passing through the tunnel to cut the anterior aspect of the prolapse . Then, after reload the stapler by the new cartridge, we used it to do the same for posterior wall and the prolapsed rectum was completely transected . We ensure that the stapler did not fire at the dentate line to avoid post-operative pain. Multiple 3-0 PDS intermittent full thickness sutures were done for hemostasis. The prolapsed rectum falls back into place spontaneously.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* old age
* complete rectal prolapse
* co-morbid ASA I to III

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

48 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

osama khalil

assistant profeosser

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

osama khalil, Ph.d

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

assistant professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zagazig Unversity

Zagazig, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IR-170133-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PRP Use in Treatment of Fistula Ano
NCT04187651 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
V-Y Flap for Anal Stenosis
NCT06860906 COMPLETED NA