Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2019-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy in Second and Third Degree Piles
NCT05770141
Hemorrhoidectomy Only Versus Hemorrhoidectomy With Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT06588374
Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids
NCT03298997
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407
Ligasure Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Open Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT04139876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A number of surgeons believe that by avoiding vascular pedicle ligation the chances of secondary bleeding can be decreased .This stimulated the researchers to develop new techniques with a less severe course and faster recovery . Recent advances in instrumental technology including the bipolar electrothermal device, ultrasonic scalpel, and circular stapler are gaining popularity as effective alternatives in hemorrhoidectomy . Of these instruments, the LigaSure vessel sealing system has been recently introduced as a tool conceived to upgrade the conventional treatment of haemorrhoids. This reduces anal spasm and allows performing a bloodless haemorrhoidectomy with reduced post- operative pain and fast healing . .Thus this operation can be recommended as the ideal technique. Many trials were performed to compare LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional hemorrhoidectomy, although an overall favorable trend exists toward LigaSure, conclusions are not univocal and definitive; this creates some uncertainty, also considering the increasing cost for this disposable device: thus it is essential to keep on experimenting to determine whenever an actual advantage exists.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Conventional haemrrhoidectomy,Ferguson technique
Conventional haemorrhoidectomy
According to the Ferguson technique
* Manual anal sphincter stretching up to 4 fingers
* Delivery of hemorrhoidal masses with artery forceps,one being applied at the base of haemorrhoid,the other at the apex.
* skin incision at the base of haemorrhoids and submucosal dissection to lift the haemorrhoid mass off the internal sphincter.
After this the haemorrhoid pedicle will be transfixed and the mucosal edges of the defect will be opposed.
Group B
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy
ligasure haemroidectomy
In ligasure group,After the haemorrhoids are prolapsed out from the anal canal with an artery forceps,Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy will be performed by applying the ligasure forceps close to the edge of each pile.Repeated applications of the device will be performed and excision will be continued into the anal canal,lifting the pile from the internal anal sphincter,to the level of the vascular pedicle,which will be finally divided.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ligasure haemroidectomy
In ligasure group,After the haemorrhoids are prolapsed out from the anal canal with an artery forceps,Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy will be performed by applying the ligasure forceps close to the edge of each pile.Repeated applications of the device will be performed and excision will be continued into the anal canal,lifting the pile from the internal anal sphincter,to the level of the vascular pedicle,which will be finally divided.
Conventional haemorrhoidectomy
According to the Ferguson technique
* Manual anal sphincter stretching up to 4 fingers
* Delivery of hemorrhoidal masses with artery forceps,one being applied at the base of haemorrhoid,the other at the apex.
* skin incision at the base of haemorrhoids and submucosal dissection to lift the haemorrhoid mass off the internal sphincter.
After this the haemorrhoid pedicle will be transfixed and the mucosal edges of the defect will be opposed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with Grade I and II haemorrhoids
* patients on anticoagulants
* patients with liver cirrhosis
* patients with the hematological disorder
* patients with the concomitant anal disease
* patients had previous history of anorectal surgery
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdulrahman Refaay Ahmed
araahmed
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ligaHaemorrhoidectomy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.