Atrial Ganglionated Plexi Ablation Guided by the SUMO Technology With and Without Conventional Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Persistent AF

NCT ID: NCT02492256

Last Updated: 2015-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been considered as the cornerstone for atrial fibrillation ablation, there has been a substantial recurrence rate. The investigators designed a prospectively randomized study to evaluate whether additional atrial ganglionated plexi ablation guided by the SUMO technology improves the clinical outcome in patients with persistent AF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PVI group

Conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type DEVICE

CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. Conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures. Exit and Entrance block conformation. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

ILR implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation the ECG loop recorder according to standard procedure

PVI+GP guided by SUMO technology group

Conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures and atrial ganglionated plexi ablation guided by the SUMO technology.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GP ablation guided by SUMO technology

Intervention Type DEVICE

CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline). RF Ablation of SUMO hotspots (in sinus rhythm if AF converts)

• Target a region of 1.0-1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO 'hotspot'. Control HFS. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

ILR implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation the ECG loop recorder according to standard procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pulmonary vein isolation

CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. Conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures. Exit and Entrance block conformation. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

Intervention Type DEVICE

GP ablation guided by SUMO technology

CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline). RF Ablation of SUMO hotspots (in sinus rhythm if AF converts)

• Target a region of 1.0-1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO 'hotspot'. Control HFS. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

Intervention Type DEVICE

ILR implantation

Implantation the ECG loop recorder according to standard procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female patients, age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years.
2. Persistent AF (ECG documentation).
3. Indication for AF ablation.
4. LVEF ≥ 50%
5. Able to provide written informed consent
6. Able to comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Reversible cause of atrial fibrillation
2. Previous AF ablation therapy
3. Clinical evidence of active coronary ischemia, significant valvular heart disease, or hemodynamically significant congenital cardiac abnormality
4. Recent (3 months) myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or transient ischemic attack (except if the patient had a DES implanted stent post-MI it would be one year)
5. Contra-indication to Iodine-123 Meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG), iodine, isoproterenol
6. Use of medication for non-cardiac medical conditions that is known to interfere with 123I-mIBG uptake and cannot be safely withheld for at least 24 hours prior to the D-SPECT study procedures
7. Inability to undergo D-SPECT and CT imaging
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

State Research Institute of CIrculation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexander Romanov, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Marina Nikitenko

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Evgeny Pokushalov, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+79139254858

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPT15429

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.