Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2018-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Oral Antidiabetic Treatments
NCT01086280
Effect of Saxagliptin Treatment on Myocardial Fat Content, and Monocyte Inflammation
NCT01548651
A Study Assessing Saxagliptin Treatment in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise
NCT00374907
Does Saxagliptin Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Events When Used Alone or Added to Other Diabetes Medications
NCT01107886
DPP-4 Inhibitors and Acute Myocardial Infarction:Effects on Platelet Function
NCT02377388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins) are oral incretin-based agents that increase glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) level, with proven anti-hyperglycemic effects and are increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes. In a rat model of diabetes and myocardial infarction, sitagliptin treatment improved passive left ventricular compliance, increased endothelial cell density, reduced myocyte hypertrophy and collagen abundance. GLP-1 and DDP-4 inhibition with vildagliptin improve cardiac function, cardiac remodeling, and survival in animal models of pressure-overload and chronic heart failure. However, in another study of post-MI cardiac remodeling in mice, vildagliptin failed to show any early or late protective effects on cardiac function.
Some clinical studies suggest that GLP-1 infusion is associated with an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure, although data are conflicting. The GLP-1 receptor analog, exenatide may reduce infarct size in patients with myocardial infarction but does not improve LVEF.
The Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Alogliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome EXAMINE trial randomized assigned 5340 patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome to alogliptin or placebo, and found no increase in adverse cardiovascular events in the alogliptin group. In SAVOR-TIMI 53, 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events were randomized to receive saxagliptin or placebo. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=0.99 for superiority; P\<0.001 for noninferiority). However, patients in the saxagliptin group were more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure, which was not ascertained in the EXAMINE trial. Furthermore, the Sitagliptin Cardiovascular Outcome Study (TECOS), which examined the DPP4i sitagliptin versus placebo in high risk patients for a cardiovascular event demonstrated cardiovascular safety (P\<0.001 for non inferiority), and there was no signal for excess heart failure hospitalizations.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the "gold standard" for measuring LV volume, mass, and ejection fraction. LV volume measurements by cardiac MRI do not rely on geometric assumptions. CMR measurements have excellent intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-study variability, which were superior to other imaging techniques. The high inter-study reproducibility of CMR affords a substantial reduction in the required sample size to demonstrate even small changes in LV volume, LV mass or LVEF, or conversely, to reliably exclude clinically important changes. Furthermore, CMR tagging allows detailed and quantitative assessment of regional LV diastolic and systolic function. For example, in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), CMR can detect subtle alterations in global and regional LV functions in patients with traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors. Although prior studies have failed to demonstrate any beneficial effects of improved glycemic control on myocardial function, CMR promises to be a more sensitive and accurate technique.
Accordingly, the investigators propose to use CMR to examine the cardiac structure, global and regional function among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with saxagliptin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single group -Paired comparison
Saxagliptin 2.5mg or 5mg od
Saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline CMR, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat CMR
Saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline echocardiogram, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat echocardiogram
saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline venipuncture, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat venipuncture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline CMR, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat CMR
Saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline echocardiogram, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat echocardiogram
saxagliptin
Eligible patients will undergo baseline venipuncture, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat venipuncture
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. HbA1c 7.5 - 9.5%
3. Receiving background therapy with metformin (additional anti-hyperglycemic agents are permitted)
4. Clinical decision to initiate saxagliptin to improve glycemic control, as per treating physician
Exclusion Criteria
2. eGFR \<30
3. Baseline LVEF \<40%
4. NYHA Class III-IV or recent hospitalization for decompensated HF (\<3 months)
5. Unstable coronary syndromes or recent revascularization within the past 3 months, or planned revascularization in the next 6 months
6. Significant (moderate or severe, or symptomatic) valvular disease
7. Pregnancy/childbearing potential
8. Routine contraindications to CMR Subjects who drop out from the study will have a repeat CMR examination as soon as possible after drug discontinuation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Subodh Verma, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor of Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-267
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.