A Comparison of Extraperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Cesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT02479932
Last Updated: 2016-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
210 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extraperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Cesarean Section
NCT02155569
Comparison of Extraperitoneal and Intraperitoneal Cesarean Technique
NCT02760290
Randomized Comparison of Sharp Versus Blunt Techniques at Cesarean
NCT01519440
Uterine Closure Techniques and Cesarean Scar Defect Risk
NCT05100147
Effect of Visceral and Parietal Peritoneum Suturation on Postoperative Vital Signs
NCT02581293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extraperitoneal cesarean
Extraperitoneal cesarean technique
Pfannenstiel incision, paravesical approach to lower uterine segment extraperitoneally and Kerr incision for uterine entry
Transperitoneal cesarean
Transperitoneal cesarean technique
Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for laparatomy and uterine entry
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transperitoneal cesarean technique
Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for laparatomy and uterine entry
Extraperitoneal cesarean technique
Pfannenstiel incision, paravesical approach to lower uterine segment extraperitoneally and Kerr incision for uterine entry
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* previous cesarean (\<4)
* cesarean for distocia
Exclusion Criteria
* risk of obstetrical bleeding
* maternal coagulation defects
* adnexial mass
* uterin myoma at incision site
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ragıp Atakan Al
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yunus E TOPDAGI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ataturk University
Omer E Yapca, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ataturk University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atatürk Üniversitesi Araştırma Hastanesi
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
77-2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.