Evaluation of the Effect of Postoperative Analgesia Techniques With ObsQoR-10
NCT ID: NCT06978491
Last Updated: 2025-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-16
2025-10-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Three Different Postcesarean Analgesic Techniques on QbsQor-10 Score
NCT06341049
Relationship Between Analgesia Techniques and Post-cesarean Recovery Quality
NCT05181358
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia Methods in Elective Cesarean Section Surgeries
NCT06425718
Evaluating The Quality of Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section
NCT06155968
Compared With Different Method for Postcesarean Section Analgesia
NCT05405049
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Group T: spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 0.25% bupivacaine and 20 ml of local anesthetic will be applied bilaterally between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle.
Group W (wound infiltration) : spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 0.25% bupivacaine and 20 ml of local anesthetic will be applied to the wound site.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group C (Control)
spinal anesthesia.
Group C
Spinal anesthesia.
Group T (Transversus Abdominis Plane Block)
The operation will be performed under spinal anesthesia and at the end of the operation, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied bilaterally between the transverse abdominis muscle and the internal oblique muscle.
Group T
spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied bilaterally between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle.
Group W (Wound Infıltration)
The operation will be performed under spinal anesthesia and at the end of the operation, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied wound infiltration
Group W
spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied to the wound site.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group C
Spinal anesthesia.
Group T
spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied bilaterally between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle.
Group W
spinal anesthesia and at the end of the surgery, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied to the wound site.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have undergone general anesthesia
* Patients requiring emergency cesarean section.
* Mental status disorders
* Known bleeding and/or coagulation disorders
* Infection at injection site
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Meryem Onay
Associate professor, Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meryem Onay
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty Of Medıcıne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eskisehir Osmangazi Universıty Faculty of Medicine
Eskişehir, Eski̇şehi̇r, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Meryem Onay
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M; PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):665-680. doi: 10.1111/anae.15339. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
Nasir F, Sohail I, Sadiq H, Habib M. Local Wound Infiltration with Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Caesarean Section. Cureus. 2019 Sep 5;11(9):e5572. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5572.
Riemma G, Schiattarella A, Cianci S, La Verde M, Morlando M, Sisti G, Esposito I, Della Corte L, Sansone P, De Franciscis P. Transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for post-cesarean section analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;153(3):383-392. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13563. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Sultan P, Kormendy F, Nishimura S, Carvalho B, Guo N, Papageorgiou C. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESOGU 6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.