The Fructose and Allulose Catalytic Effects (FACE) Trial

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diabetes remains one of the most important unmet prevention and treatment challenges, and the prevalence of diabetes continues to grow. Some functional food ingredients may hold promise as potential therapies for diabetes. One such functional food is allulose, which is a c-3 epimer of fructose. Allulose is a non-caloric sugar found naturally in small amounts in foods such as dried fruits, brown sugar and maple syrup. Previous research has found that catalytic doses of fructose and allulose have been shown to decrease the postprandial glycemic responses to high glycemic index meals. Fructose, in exchange for other carbohydrates, has also been found to decrease HbA1c levels. Whether the effects of fructose and allulose are equivalent is of particular interest, as allulose represents a non-caloric alternative to fructose. The minimum 'catalytic' dose at which improvements in carbohydrate metabolism are observed also remains to be determined for each of the sugars in people with and without diabetes. This study is an acute randomized controlled dose-finding equivalence trial to assess the effect of fructose and allulose at 2 dose levels (5g and 10g) compared with control (0g) on the glucose and insulin responses to a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in healthy and type 2 diabetes participants.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effects of D-allulose (Psicose) With Sucrose Beverage on Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Level

NCT02455934

Impaired Glucose Tolerance

COMPLETED NA

Meta-analyses of the Effect of 'Catalytic' Doses of Fructose and Its Epimers on Carbohydrate Metabolism

NCT02776722

Overweight Obesity Dysglycemia +3 more

UNKNOWN

Fructose: Substrate, Stimulus, or Both?

NCT04168372

Insulin Resistance Insulin Sensitivity Pre Diabetes

COMPLETED NA

Effects of Dietary Fructose Reduction in Children With Hepatic Steatosis

NCT01188083

Non-alcoholic Fatty-liver Disease

COMPLETED NA

Effect Dietary Fructose on Fructose Kinetics in Type 2 Diabetes

NCT05717608

Type 2 Diabetes

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes remains one of the most important unmet prevention and treatment challenges. Despite the growing armamentarium of medications, which include six new classes of drugs since metformin was first approved in 1995 in the US, the combined prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes continues to grow. Although oral antihyperglycaemic agents have been shown to prevent the development of diabetes in high-risk individuals and to reduce the risk of microvascular complications in individuals with type 2 diabetes, they have failed to deliver the anticipated macrovascular benefits.

Some functional food ingredients may hold promise as potential therapies for diabetes. An emerging literature has shown that low-dose fructose and its c-3 epimer, allulose (a non-caloric sugar found naturally in small amounts in foods such as dried fruits, brown sugar, and maple syrup which is generally recognized as safe \[GRAS\] by the FDA under GRN 400 since 2012 and GRN 498 since 2014) may benefit glycemic control.

Clinical translation of these findings has proven promising. Catalytic doses of fructose at 7.5g and 10g and allulose at 5g, 7.5g, and 10g (but not 2.5g) have been shown to decrease the postprandial glycemic responses to high glycemic index meals (oral glucose, maltodextrins, or mashed potatoes) from \~15-30% in healthy participants and those with prediabetes or diabetes. These acute effects have been shown to be sustainable over the longer term in the case of fructose. In separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled feeding trials, the investigators showed that both small doses (defined as ≤36g/day based on 3 meals at ≤10g/meal and 2 snacks at ≤3g/snack) and higher doses (median, 60g/day) of fructose in exchange for other carbohydrates decreased HbA1c by 0.4% and 0.53%, respectively, a level of reduction which exceed the clinically meaningful threshold of 0.3% proposed by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the development of new oral anti-hyperglycemic agents.

Although these findings provide a compelling proof of concept, there is an urgent need for replication studies. Whether the effects of fructose and allulose are equivalent is of particular interest, as allulose represents a non-caloric alternative to fructose. The minimum 'catalytic' dose at which improvements in carbohydrate metabolism are observed also remains to be determined for each of the sugars in people with and without diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

* To assess the acute catalytic effects of fructose and allulose at 2 dose levels (5g, 10g) compared with control (0g) on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (75g-OGTT) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether there is a dose response or threshold over the proposed dose range (0g, 5g, 10g) for the effects of fructose and allulose on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g-OGTT in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether the effects of allulose and fructose are equivalent on the primary endpoint of incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for plasma glucose across the 2 dose levels (5g and 10g) compared with control (0g) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Allulose + 75g OGTT

Allulose added to a 75 g OGTT of 500 mL at 2 doses (5g and 10g). The drinks will be matched as much as possible in appearance, taste (sweetness), texture, and packaging.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL