Risk Modelling for Quality Improvement in the Critically Ill: Making Best Use of Routinely Available Data
NCT ID: NCT02454257
Last Updated: 2023-01-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1007147 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-08-01
2022-12-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Association Between Day and Time of Admission to Critical Care and Acute Hospital Outcome
NCT02751164
Intensive Care Unit Risk Score
NCT04661735
Risk Factors for Mortality for COVID-19 Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit
NCT04805645
ICG- Liver Test Versus New Biomarkers as Prognostic Markers in Critically Ill Patients
NCT01126554
Treatment Intensity/Factors Predicting Short and Long Term Outcomes in Elderly Critically Ill Patients
NCT00554684
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific objectives are:
1. To improve risk models for adult general critical care by: (1a) developing risk models for mortality at fixed time-points and time-to event outcomes (by data linkage between the CMP and death registrations from ONS); developing risk models for longer term chronic health outcomes of (1b) diabetes (by data linkage between the CMP and the National Diabetes Audit) and (1c) end-stage renal disease (by data linkage between the CMP and the UK Renal Registry); and (1d) developing risk models for subsequent health care utilisation and costs (by data linkage between the CMP and HES)
2. To improve risk models for cardiothoracic critical care by: (2a) enhancing risk factor data (by data linkage with the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database); (2b) developing risk models for longer term mortality (by data linkage between the CMP and death registrations from ONS); and (2c) developing risk models for subsequent health care utilisation and costs (by data linkage between the CMP and HES)
3. .To improve risk models for in-hospital cardiac arrest by: (3a) enhancing risk factor data (by data linkage between NCAA and HES); (3b) developing risk models for longer term mortality, health care utilisation and costs (by data linkage between NCAA and ONS); (3c) developing risk models for subsequent critical care utilisation (by data linkage between NCAA and CMP); and (3d) developing risk models for subsequent health care utilisation and costs (by data linkage between NCAA, ONS and HES)
4. Immediate translation of the improved risk models into practice through: (4a) adoption into routine comparative outcome reporting for the national clinical audits; and (4b) communication of research output to providers, managers, commissioners, policy makers and academics in critical care
Data collection: The project will utilise high quality clinical data collected for the Case Mix Programme (CMP) and National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) - the national clinical audits for adult critical care and in-hospital cardiac arrest. These data will be linked with data from the National Diabetes Audit, UK Renal Registry and National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit, routine administrative data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and death registrations from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
Data linkage will be undertaken by the HSCIC Data Linkage and Extract Service (DLES) acting as a trusted third party. Identifiers (with no associated clinical data) will be uploaded from each national clinical audit to secure servers at HSCIC. DLES will perform the data linkage and will return a common key that can be used to link all records of the same patient across the datasets. The three national clinical audits external to ICNARC will extract an agreed, pseudonymised dataset for linked records and DLES will extract data from HES and ONS and these datasets will be passed to ICNARC. ICNARC will produce pseudonymised data extracts from the CMP and NCAA and these will be linked to the datasets provided by the national clinical audits and DLES using the common key. In this way, only pseudonymised data will be linked between the multiple data sources.
Data analysis: The following approaches for model development will be applied depending on the outcome and objectives of the analysis:
* Modelling of mortality at fixed time-points (30 days, 90 days, 1 year) using logistic regression.
* Modelling of time-to-event outcomes using standard survival regression methods such as Weibull and Cox regression.
* To handle interval-censored data: Cox proportional hazards models, complementary log-log models using partial likelihood estimation (to permit interval censoring) and discrete-time hazard models.
* To account for both interval censoring of the time-to-onset and competition with death: Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models and illness-death models will be considered.
* For Objective 3, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for greater than 20 minutes and survival to hospital discharge outcome, multilevel logistic regression with random effects of hospital will be applied.
* To model Hospital resource use and costs post-critical care: multilevel regression model and Log linear regression model.
Risk prediction models will be validated for their discrimination, calibration and overall fit using a panel of measures including: c index; plots of observed against predicted risk; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic; Cox's calibration regression; Shapiro's R, Brier's score and corresponding approximate R2 measures; and reclassification.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Admission to ICU
Patients admitted to an adult critical care unit or cardiothoracic critical care unit
No interventions assigned to this group
In-hospital cardiac arrest
Patients experiencing an in-hospital cardiac arrest
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Harrison
Head Statistician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Harrison, MA PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Head Statistician, ICNARC
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferrando-Vivas P, Shankar-Hari M, Thomas K, Doidge JC, Caskey FJ, Forni L, Harris S, Ostermann M, Gornik I, Holman N, Lone N, Young B, Jenkins D, Webb S, Nolan JP, Soar J, Rowan KM, Harrison DA. Improving risk prediction model quality in the critically ill: data linkage study [Internet]. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587779/
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Funding details
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ICNARC/02/07/15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.