Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6918 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-02-29
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to investigate potential influence/risk factors important for ICU admission in a university hospital in Germany and develop a risk score. In a second phase the risk score for ICU admission will be validated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intensive Care Unit Risk Score
NCT04661735
Assessment of OHIR Score to Predict a Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay
NCT02945358
Prediction of Safe Discharge From ICU
NCT05459350
ICG- Liver Test Versus New Biomarkers as Prognostic Markers in Critically Ill Patients
NCT01126554
Effect of Body Weight Change to Surgical ICU Outcomes
NCT01351506
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to model the risk of an ICU stay by patient centered and surgery centered influence factors. If a good model is obtained, this can be utilized for allocating ICU capacities in an objective fashion. The study consists of two phases. In the first phase model selection is performed. In the second phase the developed model will be validated on independent data. Data will be gathered by a data collection sheet completed by the responsible anesthesiologists in all elective and emergency surgery during a specific period of time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Patients receiving either elective or emergency surgery.
Patients receiving the surgery planned for them
For each patient the following potential influence (risk) factors are documented:
sex, urgency of the operation, BMI, age, ASA classification, preconditions, physical fitness, Hb value.
In phase 2 only selected influence factors will be recorded.
No intervention will be performed apart from the surgery planned for each patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patients receiving the surgery planned for them
For each patient the following potential influence (risk) factors are documented:
sex, urgency of the operation, BMI, age, ASA classification, preconditions, physical fitness, Hb value.
In phase 2 only selected influence factors will be recorded.
No intervention will be performed apart from the surgery planned for each patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA classification status \> IV
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timo Iden
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthias Grünewald, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Kiel, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Orsini J, Blaak C, Yeh A, Fonseca X, Helm T, Butala A, Morante J. Triage of Patients Consulted for ICU Admission During Times of ICU-Bed Shortage. J Clin Med Res. 2014 Dec;6(6):463-8. doi: 10.14740/jocmr1939w. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
Lupei MI, Chipman JG, Beilman GJ, Oancea SC, Konia MR. The association between ASA status and other risk stratification models on postoperative intensive care unit outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):989-94. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000187.
Wanderer JP, Anderson-Dam J, Levine W, Bittner EA. Development and validation of an intraoperative predictive model for unplanned postoperative intensive care. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):516-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829ce8fd.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ICU Risk Score
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.