Early Tracheostomy Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Severe Head Injury

NCT ID: NCT02442154

Last Updated: 2016-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severe head injury is associated with airway compromise and poor respiratory effort. In Mulago Hospital intubation is the mainstay intervention and then patients are subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway.Using endotracheal tubes is associated with complications which have been shown to increase intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.

Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better survival outcomes but no studies have been done in our setting

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction; Most patients with severe head injury cannot protect their airway, have excessive secretions and inadequate spontaneous breathing which contributes to cerebral hypoxia. Thus, in their initial management the airway is secured with either an endotracheal tube (ETT) or a tracheostomy. In Mulago Hospital some of these patients are intubated and then subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway. Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better outcomes.

Problem statement; Mulago hospital receives the largest number of patients with severe head injured with a mortality rate of 69%. Securing these patients airway using ETT is associated with complications which have been shown to increase ICU and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, most intubated patients often require ICU admission for care of ETT and mechanical ventilation and yet these patients require little or no assistance from mechanical ventilation if the airway has been secured with a tracheostomy. With limited number of ventilators and beds in ICU and increased demand for ICU admission in Mulago hospital, this poses a challenge.

Objective; To compare 30 day mortality of severe head injured patients undergoing early tracheostomy versus standard of care in Mulago Hospital and the associated factors

Methodology; Randomized controlled clinical trial, open label, to be carried out in Mulago Hospital Trauma Centre, casualty, ICU, and neuro-surgical ward high dependence unit (3AHDU).

All patients above 10years with severe traumatic brain injury who meet the study criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to either arm.

The patients on the early tracheostomy arm will undergo tracheostomy, done by an Otolaryngologist (ENT surgeon) or resident within 24 hours of admission, then admitted either in trauma center, ICU if there is space available, or Neurosurgery ward HDU. Patients will then receive routine care for the severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.

On the other arm the patients will receive the standard of care as per the attending clinician, and these are also admitted either in trauma Centre, ICU or Neurosurgery ward HDU where they also receive routine care for severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.

Follow up the primary outcome is 30day mortality The patients on both arms will be followed up for a maximum of 30 days To assess for; Acute complications of the tracheostomy (bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax) Number of days on the mechanical ventilator and development of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) for the mechanically ventilated patients using; increase in respiratory rate, FiO2, temperature and White blood cell count from the baseline, consistency of the tracheal aspirate and culture of the tracheal aspirate.

Number of days patient requires sedation for the sedated patients. Length of ICU and hospital stay and glasgow coma scale (GCS) at discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Head Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early tracheostomy

To do an early tracheostomy within 24hours of admission of the severely head injured patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tracheostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

It is a surgical procedure which involves making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea with stitching the trachea to the skin and placement of a tube

standard of care

To use the standard of care of mulago hospital for the management of the severely head injured patients

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tracheostomy

It is a surgical procedure which involves making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea with stitching the trachea to the skin and placement of a tube

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients above 10years
* GCS ≤ 8

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who undergo tracheostomies within 24hours of admission before randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Makerere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arthur Kwizera, Mmed

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Makerere Univervisity college of health science

Juliet Nalwoga, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Makerere University college of health science

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mulago Hospital Complex

Kampala, Kampala, Uganda

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013/HD07/2134U

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.