Ultra-Early, Minimally inVAsive intraCerebral Haemorrhage evacUATion Versus Standard trEatment

NCT ID: NCT04434807

Last Updated: 2025-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-15

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial of ultra-early, minimally invasive, hematoma evacuation versus standard care within 8 hours of intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients presenting to the emergency department with stroke due to supratentorial, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage \>20mL volume will be assessed to determine their eligibility for randomization into the trial. If the patient gives informed consent they will be randomized 50:50 using central computerized allocation to minimally invasive hematoma evacuation using the Aurora surgiscope and evacuator (Integra Lifesciences) versus standard medical therapy. The trial is prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design with seamless phase 2b-3 transition if the intermediate endpoint (successful hematoma evacuation) is met in analysis of the first 52 patients. Adaptive sample size re-estimation (Mehta and Pocock) will be performed when 160 patients have completed 6 month follow-up (minimum sample size 240, maximum sample size 434).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intra Cerebral Hemorrhage Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will receive either minimally invasive hematoma evacuation or standard medical therapy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The primary outcome of Modified Rankin scale (mRS) and secondary outcomes including National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) are assessed by a blinded clinician.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimally invasive hematoma evacuation

Patients randomized to minimally invasive hematoma evacuation will have neurosurgery followed by standard medical therapy in a stroke care unit or intensive care unit, as appropriate to the patients clinical condition.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Minimally invasive hematoma evacuation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Neurosurgery performed via burr hole or minicraniotomy and using the Aurora surgiscope and evacuator (Integra Lifesciences)

Standard care (medical therapy)

Patients randomized to medical management will receive the standard medical therapies for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage in a stroke care unit or intensive care unit, as appropriate to the patients clinical condition, with no planned surgical intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Minimally invasive hematoma evacuation

Neurosurgery performed via burr hole or minicraniotomy and using the Aurora surgiscope and evacuator (Integra Lifesciences)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with an acute supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) ≥20mL in volume
2. Age ≥18 years
3. Surgery can commence within 8 hours of symptom onset (the time the patient was last known to be well) or, in patients with wake-up onset, within 8 hours of the time the patient awoke with symptoms. Patients presenting with small ICH (volume \<20mL) with clinical deterioration judged due to ICH hematoma expansion meeting volume criteria may be randomized if surgery can commence within 8 hours of clinical deterioration
4. Moderate neurological deficit (NIHSS≥6)
5. Pre-stroke mRS ≤3 (independent function or requiring only minor domestic assistance and able to manage alone for at least 1 week).
6. CTA or MRA is performed and does not show an underlying vascular lesion

Exclusion Criteria

1. Brainstem ICH
2. ICH secondary to trauma, where brain injury is judged more likely to be due to the broad effects of trauma rather than the focal ICH.
3. Hereditary or acquired hemorrhagic diathesis or coagulation factor deficiency (in liver disease, INR\>1.4).
4. Platelet count \<75,000
5. Unreversible heparinization or anticoagulation. If reversing warfarin, INR should be ≤1.4 before procedure commences. Reversal of heparin by protamine, dabigatran by idarucizumab and rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin by andexanet (where available) is permitted. Unreversed anticoagulation with a last dose within 48 hours is an exclusion.
6. Recent (\<12 hours) parenteral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist.
7. Recent (\<1 hour) thrombolysis. If the ICH has occurred between 1 and 12 hours following thrombolysis, cryoprecipitate (1U per 10kg) and tranexamic acid must be administered prior to treatment.
8. Participation in any investigational study in the last 30 days
9. Pregnant women (clinically evident)
10. Co-morbidities or advance care directive preventing general anaesthesia for the procedure.
11. Known terminal illness such that the patients would not be expected to survive a year.
12. Planned withdrawal of care or comfort care measures.
13. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator could impose hazards to the patient if study therapy is initiated or affect the participation of the patient in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Melbourne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bruce Campbell

Professorial Fellow, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Timothy Kleinig

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Adelaide Hospital/University of Adelaide

Amal Abou-Hamden

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Adelaide Hospital/University of Adelaide

John Laidlaw

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Melbourne Hospital/University of Melbourne

J Mocco

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine, Mt Sinai Hospital, New York

Christopher Kellner

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine, Mt Sinai Hospital, New York

Stephen Davis

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Melbourne Hospital/University of Melbourne

Bruce Campbell

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Melbourne Hospital/University of Melbourne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

John Hunter Hospital

Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Prince of Wales Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Westmead Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Liverpool Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Gold Coast University Hospital

Southport, Queensland, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

The Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

The Alfred Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

The Austin Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Monash Medical Centre

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Royal Melbourne Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital

Role: CONTACT

+61 3 9342 4424

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michelle Russell, RN

Role: primary

+61 2 4921 3481

Fanfan Tian

Role: primary

+61 2 9382 8891

Kylie Tastula

Role: primary

+61 2 9515 4596

Lisa Tran

Role: primary

+61 2 8738 7170

Liam Maclachlan

Role: primary

+61 7 3365 1111

Victoria Cottam

Role: primary

+61 7 5687 6395

Jennifer Cranefield, RN

Role: primary

+61 8 7074 2900

Andrea Moore, RN

Role: primary

+61 3 9903 8655

Dennis Young, RN

Role: primary

+61 3 9496 4953

May Chong, RN

Role: primary

+61 3 9594 3836

Amy McDonald, RN

Role: primary

+61 3 9342 4424

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MBC2001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.