Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research is being done because currently there is no effective treatment for ICH. However, study investigators believe that Albumin, the medication being tested in this study, is safe and may help improve patient recovery from ICH over time.
Subjects will be enrolled in the study for a total of 90 days. Following enrollment, subjects will be randomized to receive 3 daily injections of either Albumin or Placebo (liquid with no drug), and will receive 3 brain MRI scans (with and without contrast), as described below.
All subjects will be monitored continuously through 96 hours after enrollment (5 days) in the Georgetown ICU. Blood tests and clinical evaluations of neurological status, consisting of questions about subjects' functional abilities and medical history, will occur in the Georgetown ICU once every 24 hours through post-enrollment Day 5. Additionally, subjects will receive daily chest x-rays, and daily EKGs (exams that monitor how your heart is doing by placing electrodes, or small monitors, on your skin in specific locations).
Similar clinical evaluations will occur at Day 30 and Day 90. Should subjects be discharged at these time points, day 30 assessments will occur over the phone, and day 90 assessments will occur in-person at Georgetown University Medical Center.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DTI-guided Minimally Invasive Hematoma Evacuation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT05891509
Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke (iCAS)
NCT02225730
Anticoagulation in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries
NCT00494156
Effect of Ischemic Strokes on Recovery From Intracerebral Hemorrhages
NCT01417117
Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT05609110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To date no acute intervention (beyond supportive medical care) has been identified to improve outcomes in patients with primary ICH. Neuronal injury from a primary ICH is due not only to the space occupying effects of the hemorrhage but also due to the development of edema and toxicity from blood breakdown products in the subacute phase. Cytoprotective strategies targeted to limit blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown and edema formation hold promise as treatment strategies to limit this injury.
A number of MR imaging outcome markers demonstrating a potential neuroprotective effect include measures of hematoma volume, perihematomal edema, and blood brain barrier disruption. The term "hyperintense acute injury marker" (HARM) has been proposed to describe the radiologic finding of hyperintense signal within the cerebrospinal fluid spaces visualized on post-contrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI in patients with acute ischemic stroke. HARM has the potential to serve as a marker of blood brain barrier disruption in patients with primary ICH. The current study will involve serial MR imaging in ICH patients randomized to placebo vs. albumin to assess whether there are differences in the frequency of HARM and perihematomal edema in the albumin treated patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Albumin
Albumin
Three (3) daily IV infusions of 1.25 g/kg Albumin (25%) on Days 1-3 following enrollment.
Brain MRI with and without contrast
All subjects will receive 3 brain MRI studies, regardless of if they are randomized into Albumin or Placebo condition.
MRIs will be with and without contrast will be performed at:
* Baseline
* 48 hours after enrollment(approximately Day 3)
* 96 hours after drug treatment begins (approximately Day 5)
Placebo
Placebo
Three (3) daily IV infusions of 1.25 g/kg Saline solution on Days 1-3 following enrollment
Brain MRI with and without contrast
All subjects will receive 3 brain MRI studies, regardless of if they are randomized into Albumin or Placebo condition.
MRIs will be with and without contrast will be performed at:
* Baseline
* 48 hours after enrollment(approximately Day 3)
* 96 hours after drug treatment begins (approximately Day 5)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Albumin
Three (3) daily IV infusions of 1.25 g/kg Albumin (25%) on Days 1-3 following enrollment.
Placebo
Three (3) daily IV infusions of 1.25 g/kg Saline solution on Days 1-3 following enrollment
Brain MRI with and without contrast
All subjects will receive 3 brain MRI studies, regardless of if they are randomized into Albumin or Placebo condition.
MRIs will be with and without contrast will be performed at:
* Baseline
* 48 hours after enrollment(approximately Day 3)
* 96 hours after drug treatment begins (approximately Day 5)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \< 48 hours from symptom onset
* Age \>18
* Signed informed consent obtained from the patient or patient's legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria
* Glasgow Coma Scale \< 6
* Surgical evacuation anticipated
* Pre-existing medical, neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological, functional, or imaging evaluations
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Hemodynamic instability (SBP \< 100 mmHg, \> 200 mmHg)
* Current participation in another experimental treatment protocol
* Renal impairment with GFR \< 30 or Creatinine \> 2.0
* History of or known allergy to albumin
* History of or known severe allergy to rubber latex
* Episode/exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF) from any cause in the last 6 months. (An episode of congestive heart failure is any heart failure that required a change in medication, diet or hospitalization)
* Acute myocardial infarction in the last 6 months
* Elevated serum troponin level on admission \> 0.1 mcg/L
* Known valvular heart disease with CHF in the last 6 months
* Known (or in the investigator's judgment) existence of severe aortic stenosis or mitral stenosis
* Cardiac surgery involving thoracotomy (e.g., coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), valve replacement surgery) in the last 6 months
* Suspicion of aortic dissection on admission
* Acute arrhythmia (including any tachy- or bradycardia) with hemodynamic instability on admission (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg).
* Findings on physical examination of any of the following: (1) jugular venous distention (JVP \> 4 cm above the sternal angle); (2) 3rd heart sound; (3) resting tachycardia (heart rate \> 100/min) attributable to congestive heart failure; (4) abnormal hepatojugular reflux; (5) lower extremity pitting edema attributable to congestive heart failure or without apparent cause; (6) bilateral rales; and/or (7) if a chest x-ray is performed, definite evidence of pulmonary edema, bilateral pleural effusion, or pulmonary vascular redistribution.
* Current acute or chronic lung disease requiring supplemental chronic or intermittent oxygen therapy.
* Prosthetic heart valves
* Contraindication to MRI (metal implant, etc.)
* Documented left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Georgetown University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chelsea Kidwell, M.D.
Professor of Neurology; Medical Director, Georgetown University Stroke Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chelsea Kidwell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Georgetown University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-173
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.