Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms

NCT ID: NCT02438228

Last Updated: 2016-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study is to compare accuracy and precision of Cardiac Output (CO) by nine different pulse contour algorithms with transpulmonary thermodilution before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After induction of anesthesia, a central venous catheter and a transpulmonary thermodilution catheter (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) are introduced in the right internal jugular vein and in the femoral artery, respectively. The thermodilution catheter is connected to a PiCCO2 monitor (Software version 1.3.0.8). Thereafter, placement of an esophageal doppler probe is performed and the probe is connected to a unique Monitoring System (Deltex Medical, Chichester, UK) with nine different pulse contour algorithms. Cardiac Output by esophageal doppler is used to calibrate the nine different pulse contour algorithms.

After induction of anesthesia and establishment of all monitoring devices, a passive leg raising maneouvre (PLR) is performed and hemodynamic variables including CO by transpulmonary thermodilution (COTPTD) and CO by nine different pulse contour algorithms (COX1-9) are recorded before, during and after PLR. Subsequently, measurements of COTPTD and COX1-9 are carried out every 10 minutes until the beginning of CPB. Fifteen minutes after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass calibration of nine different pulse contour algorithms by esophageal doppler are performed again and measurements of CITPTD and CIPFX are restarted up to the end of the surgical Intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Output

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cardiac output measurement

Group Type OTHER

Cardiac output measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary thermodilution, nine different pulse contour algorithms and esophageal doppler before, during and after a PLR-maneouvre and every 10 minutes before and after cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cardiac output measurement

Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary thermodilution, nine different pulse contour algorithms and esophageal doppler before, during and after a PLR-maneouvre and every 10 minutes before and after cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients \> 18 years of age with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 0.5.
* Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \<18 years of age and with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.5 are not considered for the study.
* Emergency procedures and patients with hemodynamic instability requiring continuous pharmacologic support, intracardiac shunts, severe aortic-, tricuspid- or mitral stenosis or insufficiency and mechanical circulatory support were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ole Broch, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Berthold Bein, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Berthold Bein

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schloglhofer T, Gilly H, Schima H. Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2014 May;61(5):452-79. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0135-8. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24643474 (View on PubMed)

Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1180-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20736431 (View on PubMed)

Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T, Matsuura T, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):170-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet022. Epub 2013 Mar 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23479677 (View on PubMed)

Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Kuzkov VV, Bjertnaes LJ, Kirov MY. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1024-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet489. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24531685 (View on PubMed)

Huang L, Critchley LA. An assessment of two Doppler-based monitors to track cardiac output changes in anaesthetised patients undergoing major surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Sep;42(5):631-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200514.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25233178 (View on PubMed)

Singer M. Oesophageal Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Jun;15(3):244-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832b7083.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19417642 (View on PubMed)

Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, Masing S, Huenges K, Haneya A, Steinfath M, Renner J. Accuracy of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Comparison with Transpulmonary Thermodilution. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3468015. doi: 10.1155/2016/3468015. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28116294 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AZ-138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.