Rheumatologists and the Requesting of Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) Tests in Patients With Rheumatologic Complaints

NCT ID: NCT02409251

Last Updated: 2015-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a simple intervention (a combination of education and feedback) on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) testing.

This aim was chosen because of the known overuse of many laboratory tests, of which ANA testing is one. As overuse of ANA tests can have negative consequences (both for patients and society), the investigators designed an intervention to see how this would influence Antinuclear Antibody testing by rheumatologists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Education and feedback

The intervention consisted of a one-hour, small group educational session. During this session information on rational ANA testing was provided and feedback on current ANA testing was provided to the rheumatologists. A booster session with the same components was held 6 months after the first session.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education and feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education and feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* rheumatologists who are consulting patients at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of a participating centre

Exclusion Criteria

* rheumatologists not working the full study period (pre- and post-intervention) at a participating centre
* rheumatologists not giving their consent to participate


\- patients with an ANA test requested during a clinical admission
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sint Maartenskliniek

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nienke Lesuis

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ronald van Vollenhoven, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet

Marlies Hulscher, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Alfons den Broeder, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sint Maartenskliniek

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maartenskliniek Woerden

Woerden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lesuis N, Hulscher ME, Piek E, Demirel H, van der Laan-Baalbergen N, Meek I, van Vollenhoven RF, den Broeder AA. Choosing Wisely in Daily Practice: An Intervention Study on Antinuclear Antibody Testing by Rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Apr;68(4):562-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.22725.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26414008 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RR-103-ANA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rheumatology Diet Study
NCT06339957 RECRUITING