Rheumatologists and the Requesting of Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) Tests in Patients With Rheumatologic Complaints
NCT ID: NCT02409251
Last Updated: 2015-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
29 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This aim was chosen because of the known overuse of many laboratory tests, of which ANA testing is one. As overuse of ANA tests can have negative consequences (both for patients and society), the investigators designed an intervention to see how this would influence Antinuclear Antibody testing by rheumatologists.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Beliefs About Medication in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT00968266
Medication Adherence in Rheumatic Diseases
NCT06018350
Study of Some Risk Factors for Developing RA
NCT03624179
The Predictive Value of Ultrasound in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01752309
Diagnostic Value of Anti-MCV in Pts With RA
NCT03265236
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Education and feedback
The intervention consisted of a one-hour, small group educational session. During this session information on rational ANA testing was provided and feedback on current ANA testing was provided to the rheumatologists. A booster session with the same components was held 6 months after the first session.
Education and feedback
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education and feedback
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* rheumatologists not giving their consent to participate
\- patients with an ANA test requested during a clinical admission
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sint Maartenskliniek
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nienke Lesuis
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ronald van Vollenhoven, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Marlies Hulscher, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Alfons den Broeder, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sint Maartenskliniek
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Maartenskliniek Woerden
Woerden, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lesuis N, Hulscher ME, Piek E, Demirel H, van der Laan-Baalbergen N, Meek I, van Vollenhoven RF, den Broeder AA. Choosing Wisely in Daily Practice: An Intervention Study on Antinuclear Antibody Testing by Rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Apr;68(4):562-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.22725.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RR-103-ANA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.