Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
443 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Behavioral Economics to Implement Nutrition Ranking in Food Pantries
NCT05854212
A Trial of Traffic Light Labeling With Behavioral Nudges and a Healthy Recipe Database to Increase Selection of Healthier Foods in Client-choice Food Pantries
NCT04243252
Behavioral Economics to Implement a Traffic Light Nutrition Ranking System: Study 2
NCT06298253
Building on a Point-of-purchase Intervention to Encourage Healthy Food Choices
NCT01604499
Evaluating Taste and Health Messaging in Short Nutrition Education Videos to Improve Diet Quality
NCT06570382
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Order
The investigators arrange the placement of the targeted good to see if the order affects selection.
Order
In the order intervention, the investigators place the targeted product at the front of the line for the treatment. For the control, the investigators place the targeted product at the end of the line.
Packaging
The investigators adjust the packaging of the targeted good to determine the effects on selection.
Packaging
In the packaging intervention, the investigator present the targeted product in the original package. In the control, the investigator repackage the targeted product in clear, plastic bags.
Pricing
In food pantries, few products are priced. The investigators use pricing of products to determine its effect on selection.
Pricing
In the pricing intervention, the investigators price all or targeted products in the treatment. In the control, the investigators do not price the products.
Relative Proportions
The investigators adjust the proportion of the products to determine the effect on the selection of the targeted product.
Relative Proportions
The investigators adjust the amount of the targeted good available relative to the other products. In the treatment, the targeted good is a larger proportion of the total goods offered in the section, while in the control the shares of the targeted and other goods are equal.
Default Option
The investigators provide a targeted product to subjects at one point. Later, investigators offer subjects the possibility to exchange the targeted product for a close substitute.
Default Option
In an early site, the investigators offer a targeted product without an alternative. The subjects can accept or reject the offer. The subjects are told that an alternative product is available later. At the site where the alternative product is available, investigators offer subjects the opportunity to exchanged the targeted product for the alternative product.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Order
In the order intervention, the investigators place the targeted product at the front of the line for the treatment. For the control, the investigators place the targeted product at the end of the line.
Packaging
In the packaging intervention, the investigator present the targeted product in the original package. In the control, the investigator repackage the targeted product in clear, plastic bags.
Pricing
In the pricing intervention, the investigators price all or targeted products in the treatment. In the control, the investigators do not price the products.
Relative Proportions
The investigators adjust the amount of the targeted good available relative to the other products. In the treatment, the targeted good is a larger proportion of the total goods offered in the section, while in the control the shares of the targeted and other goods are equal.
Default Option
In an early site, the investigators offer a targeted product without an alternative. The subjects can accept or reject the offer. The subjects are told that an alternative product is available later. At the site where the alternative product is available, investigators offer subjects the opportunity to exchanged the targeted product for the alternative product.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cornell University
OTHER
Auburn University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Norbert L Wilson
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Norbert L Wilson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Auburn University
David R. Just, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cornell University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR, Klinger MZ. Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools. Prev Med. 2012 Oct;55(4):330-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR. Can branding improve school lunches? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Oct;166(10):1-2. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.999. No abstract available.
Hanks AS, Just DR, Wansink B. Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity. J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):867-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
Wansink B, Just DR, Hanks AS, Smith LE. Pre-sliced fruit in school cafeterias: children's selection and intake. Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):477-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.003.
Wilson NLW, Just DR, Swigert J, Wansink B. Food pantry selection solutions: a randomized controlled trial in client-choice food pantries to nudge clients to targeted foods. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Jun 1;39(2):366-372. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw043.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AuburnU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.