Safety and Contraceptive Efficacy of an Intravaginal Ring With LNG (Levonorgestrel) Over One Year in Healthy Women

NCT ID: NCT02403401

Last Updated: 2021-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1471 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-15

Study Completion Date

2016-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose of the study is to investigate safety and contraceptive efficacy of an LNG-containing intravaginal ring.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contraception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Levonorgestrel (BAY98-7196)

Vaginal ring containing 170 mg levonorgestrel

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Levonorgestrel (BAY98-7196)

Intervention Type DRUG

Levonorgestrel 40 µg/d intravaginal ring (treatment for 365 days, 28 days wearing period for each ring)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Levonorgestrel (BAY98-7196)

Levonorgestrel 40 µg/d intravaginal ring (treatment for 365 days, 28 days wearing period for each ring)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy female subject requesting contraception and willing to use the IVR
* Normal or clinically insignificant cervical smear not requiring further follow up (a cervical smear has to be taken at screening visit or a normal result has to be documented within the previous 6 months)
* History of regular cyclic menstrual periods
* Subject is willing and able to attend the scheduled study visits and comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation (less than three months since delivery, abortion, or lactation before start of treatment)
* Any diseases or conditions that can compromise the function of the body systems and could result in altered absorption, excessive accumulation, impaired metabolism, or altered excretion of the study drug
* Any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the conduct of the study or the interpretation of the results
* Any disease or condition that may worsen under hormonal treatment according to the assessment and opinion of the investigator
* Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding
* Wish for pregnancy during the study
* Major surgery scheduled during the study period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New London, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Leesburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oviedo, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

Port Jefferson, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Summerville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Pleasant Grove, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Funabashi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Yotsukaidō, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Aki-gun, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Hachiōji, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Nishitōkyō, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Ōta-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Fukui, , Japan

Site Status

Fukui, , Japan

Site Status

Fukui, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Japan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nave R, Hochel J, Mellinger U, Kohnke A, Elliesen J, Schmitz H. Pearl Index study with levonorgestrel-releasing intravaginal rings: using pharmacokinetic results to investigate treatment compliance as a potential contributor for contraceptive failure. Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2515-2523. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa195.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32914172 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://clinicaltrials.bayer.com/

Click here to find results for studies related to Bayer Healthcare products.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16803

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mirena Extension Trial
NCT02985541 COMPLETED PHASE3