SEEK Study - Study on Emergency Health Care Workers' Job Strain Evaluated by Karasek Questionnaire
NCT ID: NCT02401607
Last Updated: 2021-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-01
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The same measures will be repeated every 5 year to assess long term changes in subjective and objective measures of stress.
The study's main objective is the creation of an Emergency Health Care worker's cohort to assess the evolution of the Karasek questionnaire during the follow-up.
Secondary objectives are
* the evaluation of the food intake before, during and after a nightshift.
* the evaluation of other questionnaires
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Burn Out Among Medical Family Doctors
NCT04242862
Establishing a Cohort for Occupational Disease of Emergency Medical Workers
NCT05357365
HEalthCAre Workers' Health: a Transversal Evaluation
NCT06588621
Burn Out and Quality of Life at French General Practioners
NCT04136899
Study of Psychosocial and Contextual Determinants of General Practitioners' Management of Burnout
NCT06811181
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A way of measuring stress at work is the use of self-reported psychological questionnaire. Among them, the Job control demand model from Karasek is widely used to evaluate psychosocial factors at work. The Karasek job strain model has been assessed in 25 000 workers in the Sumer study and allowed to classify the main types of occupations. However, no data regarding emergency physicians scores at the Karasek questionnaire were available, even though burnout exposure is a well-known problematic among health care workers. This absence is particularly unfortunate as emergency physicians often needs to deals with life threatening emergency in a short amount of time, following regularly long and craving shifts. A preliminary study with a low sample size reported in concrete terms the atypical "out of limit" situations of emergency physicians, with a decision latitude among the lowest and the highest psychological demand ever reported. Moreover, variation of stress at work has been linked with professional experiences. Karasek questionnaire is supposed to assess a long-term stable perception of work, despite the absence of study comparing Karasek scores within different conditions in the same participant. It is also important to explore protective factors that might help alleviate perceived stress and that are quite easy to integrate into medical organizations or in daily lifestyle.
Finally, several biomarkers of stress have been proposed. Among them, our team previously highlighted the potential of DHEAS to assess stress, due to its stability (steroid) and its long half-life of 16 hours. To our knowledge, the relationships between biomarkers of stress and the Karasek job strain model have never been investigated. Comparisons between emergency health care workers are also lacking.
Therefore, the general aim of this study is to enhance psychological well-being in emergency physicians. The primary objective is to verify our preliminary findings at Karasek scores on a large sample size of emergency physicians. The secondary objectives are to evaluate whether there is a change in perception of work both at short-term (on leave and after a 24-hour shift) and long-term (with professional experience). We will further explore its relationships with some biomarkers of stress and protective factors. Moreover, we aim to compare emergency health care workers specificity.
Questionnaires and saliva collection will be performed twice: at the beginning of a day work and at the end of a night work. Both measures will be recorded at the same time within each participant, between 6.30 am and 8.30 am depending of the health care workers. The time required by participant is evaluated to about 15min each time.
The same measures will be repeated every 5 year to assess long term changes in subjective and objective measures of stress.
The population description will be achieved with descriptive statistics. Continuous variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation, under the normality of distribution condition (Shapiro-Wilk needed).
The primary analysis will be mainly descriptive and will express (as a quantitative and categorical variables) the perception scores of emergency physicians work according to the Karasek questionnaire, for each dimensions composing the score (decision latitude, psychological demands and social support).
The evolution of the Karasek questionnaire score, obtained for each dimension, will be tested with a paired two-sample emergency physician's test (or nonparametric Wilcoxon test if necessary). Linear regression models or aleatory effects models (as described by Klar and Darlington, 2004, in Statistics in Medicine) will eventualy complete these analyzes. This will permit, with multivariate analyzes and the introduction of covariates, to seek for possible explanatory factors of the Karasek score and its evolution. The same process will be used for quantitative parameters that will be collected.
All statistical analyses will be performed as bilateral tests with a p \<0.05 considered as significant. Statistical analyzes will be performed using STATA 16 software (Stata Corporation, College Station).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Karasek questionnaire and Saliva prelevement
Karasek questionniare and Saliva collection will be assessed on any health care worker working in any emergency department in France at day 1 and at 5 years
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Association des Médecins des Urgences de Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Université d'Auvergne
OTHER
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frederic DUTHEIL
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bouillon-Minois JB, Trousselard M, Pereira B, Schmidt J, Clinchamps M, Thivel D, Ugbolue UC, Moustafa F, Occelli C, Vallet G, Dutheil F. Protocol of the Study on Emergency Health Care Workers' Responses Evaluated by Karasek Questionnaire: The SEEK-Study Protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084068.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHU-0228
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.