Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
6000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-12-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack
NCT00399503
Objective Systolic Function Recuperation Assessed by Echocardiography
NCT01086124
Invasive Coronary Angiography Early in Ischemic Heart Failure
NCT04245605
Incidence of and Prognostic Factors Associated With Heart Failure Following Myocardial Infarction: a CALIBER Study
NCT02384213
Clinical Presentation and Outcomes in Patients at Risk of Type II Myocardial InfarctioN in the emerGency Department.
NCT03953651
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients suffering a myocardial infraction (MI) may have from minimal to extensive myocardial damage. While severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction that persists beyond the initial 2-3 months of an MI is a predictor of sudden death, the prognostic significance of less severe LV dysfunction after MI is unclear.
There is significant clinical value in quantifying LV function after the recovery phase of an MI. This information is vital in guiding the breadth and duration of therapies known to improve prognosis (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin blockers, anticoagulants, and others). Further, it will identify patients in whom other therapies, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), are recommended. Yet, no guidelines to guide clinical decision making in terms of collecting follow-up ejection fraction (EF) data in such patients who do not also have overt heart failure.
Purpose The Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) project proposes to
1. document clinical practice by collecting data on the proportion of patients with initial LV dysfunction after MI without a follow-up EF assessment arranged,
2. collect follow-up EF data in patients with initial LV dysfunction post-MI and evaluate the prognostic significant of EF early and late after MI as well as factors associated with the change in value, and
3. educate physicians regarding the importance of EF reassessment after MI.
Follow up LV assessment
The current guidelines do not clearly provide clear indications to the appropriate timing or modality of follow up left ventricular assessments. We have chosen to define an adequate follow up LV assessment to occur within 2 to 12 months post-myocardial infarction, measured by any modality such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, or nuclear perfusion scan.
Overall Study Objectives
1. To evaluate the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical variables such as age, gender, co-morbid conditions, MI characteristics, and the prescription of pharmacological agents after MI.
2. To assess the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical outcomes.
Study Methodology and Data Collection
This study will be conducted in three phases:
1. determining the existing practice of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction following myocardial infarction within the Calgary region (Quality Assurance);
2. determining the factors associated with LVEF improvement, stability and decline post-MI and the relationship of these with outcome (Prognostic Factor Study);
3. educating the clinical community about the importance of follow up LVEF assessments and reporting the findings of this through presentations, educational materials and/or academic publications (Knowledge Dissemination)
Study Population
The study population will include patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI) undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center, who have significant left ventricular impairment upon initial LV assessment as defined as at least:
* At least mod dysfunction (LVEF \< 0.40) if no prior history of MIs (i.e. first MI)
* More than mild-moderate dysfunction (LVEF \< 0.45) if prior history of MI Exclusion criteria include: patients lost to follow up by their family physician or primary cardiologist, and patients who are deceased who do not have a follow-up EF.
Patients will be identified using the APPROACH (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (www.approach.org)) database. All patients will have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH.
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Part One (Quality Assurance) will include patients with an MI occurring between July 1, 2010 to November 30, 2011 (15 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI, the study group will determine if a follow up LVEF assessment has been performed within 2 to 12 months post-MI by contacting the patient's family physician and/or primary cardiologist for any records of LVEF measurements, and searching through the following electronic databases.
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
Part Two (Prognostic Factor Study) will include patients with myocardial infarctions occurring on December 5, 2011 until December 5, 2012 (12 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI (as described in section 5.1), the study group will contact the patient, the patient's family physician, and/or patient's primary cardiologist to order a follow up LVEF measurement within 2 to 12 months post- myocardial infarction. That is, all patients that have significant LV dysfunction will undergo follow up LVEF measurements between December 5, 2011 and December 5, 2012. Modalities for follow up LVEF measurements will include echocardiogram, cardiac MRI, and nuclear perfusion imaging at the discretion of the family physician or primary cardiologist.
These follow up LVEF measurements will be entered into the APPROACH database in order to allow us to evaluate the clinical significance of changes in EF after MI and prognostic significance of initial versus follow-up EF values.
Data Analysis
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Data collected will be entered into a database and summary statistics will be created (e.g. proportion of follow up LVEF assessments completed post-MI (Aim 5.1), choice of modality for follow up LVEF assessment, etc.) Data collected from the surveys will be entered into a database and analyzed in SAS or Stata. Summary statistics will be created from the data collected in the surveys.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) Project Research Protocol - Updated Feb 29, 2012
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
As part of AMIQA Phase II, LVEF assessments will be entered into the APPROACH database. The study will compare initial LVEF measurements post-MI to follow-up LVEF measurements, and assess for improvement, stability and deterioration of LVEF and the factors associated with these changes in LVEF.
This project has received ethics approval by the Conjoint Health Research and Ethics Board of the University of Calgary. Patients will be identified using the APPROACH database have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH. Only the research team will know the names and contact information of the patients included in the study, and this information will be kept confidential.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective
MI prior to December 11, 2011
Standard of Care
Prospective
MI on or after December 11, 2011
Quality Assurance Implementation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quality Assurance Implementation
Standard of Care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Derek Exner
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Derek Exner
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derek V Exner, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Derek V Exner, MD, MPH
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
QA20111211
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.