Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT02373631

Last Updated: 2017-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy (manual physical therapy, exercise, range of motion, and stretching) versus conventional physical therapy combined with dry needling in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Physical therapists commonly use conventional physical therapy techniques and dry needling to treat knee OA, and this study is attempting to find out if the addition of dry needling to conventional physical therapy has an equal, greater, or lesser effect than conventional physical therapy alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with knee OA will be randomized to receive 1-2 treatments per week for 6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total) of either: (1) Dry Needling and conventional physical therapy or the (2) Conventional physical therapy (manual physical therapy, exercise, range of motion and stretching)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dry Needling, Conventional PT

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dry Needling, Conventional PT

Intervention Type OTHER

Dry needling to the knee and conventional physical therapy (stretching, ROM, strengthening), 1-2 treatments per week X6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total)

Conventional PT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional PT

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional physical therapy to include knee stretching, range of motion, and strengthening exercises,1-2 treatments per week X6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dry Needling, Conventional PT

Dry needling to the knee and conventional physical therapy (stretching, ROM, strengthening), 1-2 treatments per week X6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total)

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional PT

Conventional physical therapy to include knee stretching, range of motion, and strengthening exercises,1-2 treatments per week X6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Report of knee pain of at least 2/10 per NPRS (0---10 scale) for \>3 months
2. Report of at least 3 of the following per Altman et al. (1986)

* Over 50 Years of age
* Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness
* Crepitus on active motion
* Bony tenderness
* Bony enlargement
* No palpable warmth of synovium

Exclusion Criteria

1. Report of red flags to manual physical therapy to include: hypertension, infection, diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, heart disease, stroke, chronic ischemia, edema, severe varicosities, tumor, metabolic disease, prolonged steroid use, fracture, RA, osteoporosis, severe vascular disease, malignancy, etc.
2. History of previous surgery to the knee
3. History of physical therapy, massage therapy, chiropractic treatment, or injections for knee pain in the last 4 weeks
4. History of a surgical procedure on either lower extremity in last 6 months
5. Two or more positive neurologic signs consistent with nerve root compression, including any two of the following:

* Weakness involving a major muscle group of the lower extremity.
* Diminished patella or achilles tendon reflex
* Diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in lower extremity dermatome
6. Involvement in litigation or worker's compensation regarding knee pain.
7. Any condition that might contraindicate the use of electro-needling
8. The patient is pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Dunning, DPT, MSc, FAAOMPT

DPT MSc FAAOMPT

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Dunning, DPT FAAOMPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dunning J, Butts R, Young I, Mourad F, Galante V, Bliton P, Tanner M, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Periosteal Electrical Dry Needling as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2018 Dec;34(12):1149-1158. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000634.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29864043 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAMT0003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.