Validation of a Non-invasive Diagnostic Method for Sarcoidosis Using Exhaled Breath
NCT ID: NCT02361281
Last Updated: 2015-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-12-31
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Such a new diagnostic tool might be found in examining the exhaled air of patients, which contains a complex mixture of so-called volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are the result of damaging processes that occur in the lung. Determining the VOC profile in the breath can be used as a biomarker, or biological indicator, of those damaging processes. In other words, searching for unique VOC profiles in the breath of sarcoidosis patients might lead to the development of a diagnostic tool that only uses their exhaled breath.
The current study involves 25 sarcoidosis patients and 25 healthy volunteers. The aim of this study is find VOCs in exhaled air that can be used to diagnose sarcoidosis. In a previous study, sarcoidosis-specific VOCs were found, which we intend to validate using the current study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Case Controlled Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis (ACCESS)
NCT00005276
Muscle Strength and Exercise Capacity in Sarcoidosis Patients
NCT00854672
Test-retest Reliability for Fatigue Assessment Scale, Short Form 6 Dimension and King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire
NCT04508361
Evaluation of Exhaled Breath Condensate in the Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
NCT01247142
Patient Reported Outcome Instruments in Sarcoidosis
NCT04342403
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sarcoidosis patients
Clinically relevant sarcoidosis patients with different stages and treatments.
No interventions assigned to this group
Healthy controls
Healthy people without any pulmonary conditions
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* for healthy controls: controls with pulmonary disease excluded
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gelderse Vallei Hospital
OTHER
Atrium Medical Center
OTHER
Maastricht University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rianne Fijten, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fijten RRR, Smolinska A, Drent M, Dallinga JW, Mostard R, Pachen DM, van Schooten FJ, Boots AW. The necessity of external validation in exhaled breath research: a case study of sarcoidosis. J Breath Res. 2017 Nov 29;12(1):016004. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa8409.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BC/1408-389
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.