Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound Corrrelation With MRI

NCT ID: NCT02356601

Last Updated: 2015-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ultrasound is used increasingly to aid placement of neuraxial blocks. Good visibility of ligamentum duramater complex and posterior longitudinal ligament (LF, PLL) has a positive predictive value of 85% for successful neuraxial block. Dural puncture could still be feasible despite the absence of a good view, as reflected by a negative predictive value of 30%.

Poor neuraxial ultrasound view could be due to limitations of ultrasound or various other anatomical reasons which might include absent LF, calcification of ligaments, spinous process contact and presence or absence of epidural or subdural fat. This will be the first study of its kind to compare neuraxial ultrasound with MRI. The aim of this study is to look for anatomical correlation between neuraxial ultrasound and MRI at various lumbar interspinous levels and to look at factors that contribute to abnormal neuraxial imaging. Assuming the predicted abnormal ultrasound images to be around 30% and predicted abnormal MRI images to be 5%, 79 images should give a power of 0.9 and alpha 0.01 to analyse the association between the two. Sample Size Calculations were performed using statistical software R version 2.15.2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After ethical committee approval, 20 consenting patients scheduled for MRI lumbar spine were included in the study. Patients with previous spinal surgeries or with gross spinal deformities were excluded. In all patients ultrasound scanning of the lumbar interspinous spaces was performed with curvilinear 2-5 MHz Sonosite probe. At each lumbar interspinous level (L1-2 to L5-S1) the best possible transverse and paramedian oblique sagittal view was obtained. The obtained ultrasound images were the graded based on the visibility of LF and PLL. The lumbar spine MRI images were analyzed by radiologists who were blinded to the ultrasound images. On MRI various parameters such as depth of epidural space, absence of LF, thickness of LF, characteristics of muscular and intervening fatty tissue, epidural/subdural fat thickness etc was noted. The correlation between neuraxial ultrasound images and various parameters observed in MRI was identified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ultrasound Imaging of Lumbar Spine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Any adult having MRI lumbar spine done

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with previous spinal surgery Gross spinal deformities BMI more than 50
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Adelaide and Meath Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karthikeyan Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan

Specialist Registrar,Anaesthetics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013/03/20 chairman's action

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA