Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Improve Interventional Outcomes for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy?

NCT ID: NCT00826124

Last Updated: 2011-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

131 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most frequently performed procedures in pain clinics. When performing ESI, there is no consensus about how to best select candidates for this intervention, and which level(s) to inject. Some experts advocate basing the injection level on MRI findings, whereas others recommend clinical symptoms. In order to determine whether MRI is necessary before referring patients with chronic LBP radiating into the leg(s) for pain management interventions, we will perform a randomized comparative study involving 131 patients with chronic low back and leg pain who are clinically candidates for epidural steroid injections into two groups. Group I will receive two ESI based solely on historical and physical exam (PE) findings. Group II will receive treatment only after MRI is reviewed.

The investigators' hypothesis is that MRI will not have a significant effect on treatment outcome, and will have minimal impact on patient care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One hundred and thirty-one patients referred to the Blaustein Pain Treatment Center with back and leg pain will be randomized to receive one of two treatments. Sixty-three patients will be allocated to group I and up to 68 to group II (see below and statistical analysis). All patients will be candidates for ESI based on history and physical exam. All 63 group I patients will receive two ESI based solely on history and PE (i.e. the treating physician will be blinded to MRI results). Group II will receive treatment based on MRI, history and PE. This probably but may not include ESI (i.e. it is conceivable that a normal MRI might result in conventional therapy instead of ESI, though chemical irritation of nerve roots often occurs without disc protrusion. We estimate this to occur in no more than 10% of cases (probably less); hence, we are planning to randomize up to 68 patients to group II. If an ESI is done, the patient will receive two injections, similar to patients in group I. Randomization will be done by a research assistant via a computerized randomization system in groups of 13. In order to ensure no serious pathology is missed in group I subjects, a separate doctor with no knowledge of treatment allocation will review the films. If there is serious pathology such as evidence of spinal metastases or infection, the patient will be excluded from the study. There will be no "control" group in this study. Both evaluating physicians and patients will be blinded until they exit the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

I

Two epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history and physical exam alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural steroid injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection based solely on history and physical exam

II

Two epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history, physical exam and MRI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural steroid injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history, physical exam and MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Imaging of lumbar spine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epidural steroid injection

Injection based solely on history and physical exam

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epidural steroid injection

Two epidural steroid injections two weeks apart based on history, physical exam and MRI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Imaging of lumbar spine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18
* Candidates for ESI based on history and physical exam
* NRS pain score \> 4
* Leg pain \> back pain
* Patients already have an MRI

Exclusion Criteria

* Untreated coagulopathy
* Previous spine surgery
* Leg pain \> 4 years duration
* Epidural steroid injection within past 2 years
* Serious (e.g., bowel or bladder incontinence, loss of reflexes) or progressive neurological deficit
* Referrals from surgery diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
* Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) or psychiatric (untreated depression) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
* Pregnancy
* Serious underlying pathology (e.g., vertebral fracture, spinal infection or metastases), as determined by an independent reviewer (group I) or the treating physician (group II) on MRI. The investigator and injector for group I patients will remain blinded to this review except to know that serious pathology was ruled out.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Pain Management Division

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven P Cohen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, Kerslake R, Miller P, Pringle M. Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):400-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.400.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11179160 (View on PubMed)

Gilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MG, Vale LD, Campbell MK, Scott NW, Knight DJ, Wardlaw D; Scottish Back Trial Group. Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome--multicenter randomized trial. Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):343-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312030886. Epub 2004 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15031430 (View on PubMed)

Modic MT, Obuchowski NA, Ross JS, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Grooff PN, Mazanec DJ, Benzel EC. Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):597-604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041509.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16244269 (View on PubMed)

Cohen SP, Argoff CE, Carragee EJ. Management of low back pain. BMJ. 2008 Dec 22;337:a2718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2718. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19103627 (View on PubMed)

Cohen SP, Gupta A, Strassels SA, Christo PJ, Erdek MA, Griffith SR, Kurihara C, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Cornblath D, Vu TN. Effect of MRI on treatment results or decision making in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy referred for epidural steroid injections: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):134-42. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.593. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22157067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NA_00022479

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.