Treosulfan-based Versus Busulfan-based Conditioning in Paediatric Patients With Non-malignant Diseases

NCT ID: NCT02349906

Last Updated: 2025-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2023-02-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the trial is to describe the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Treosulfan compared to the conventional (myeloablative) dose of i.v. Busulfan, each administered as part of a standardised Fludarabine-containing conditioning regimen and to contribute to a PK model which permits - in conjunction with data comparing Treosulfan and Busulfan in adults with malignant diseases - to extend the use of Treosulfan in the paediatric population by extrapolating efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prospective clinical phase II protocol MC-FludT.16/NM is to be conducted to verify safety and efficacy of Treosulfan-based conditioning compared to Busulfan-based conditioning in paediatric patients. Based on the given clinical experience with either Treosulfan-based or Busulfan-based conditioning in combination with Fludarabine no increased risk for graft failure is expected in paediatric patients. A potential benefit for study patients is expected with respect to a probably low non-haematological toxicity of treatment compared to myeloablative TBI-based conditioning or high-dose Busulfan-based conditioning in combination with Cyclophosphamide.

However, the allogeneic HSCT procedure itself potentially involves serious risks with regard to severe or life-threatening conditions like graft versus host disease (GvHD) and/or infectious complications as well as graft failure.

In summary, the primary goal of this study is to evaluate the Treosulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen as an alternative in children and to contribute to the current PK model for Treosulfan to be able to finally give age (or body surface area \[BSA\]) dependent dose recommendations. The treatment regimens given in the protocol MC-FludT.16/NM are based on sufficient clinical safety and efficacy data. Considering the vital indication for allogeneic HSCT of the selected patient population, the risk-benefit assessment seems to be in favour of the study conduct.

Moreover, planned interim analyses will ensure the early identification of unexpected risks. Therefore, the conduct of the protocol MC-FludT.16/NM is considered reasonably justified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Immunodeficiencies Inborn Errors of Metabolism Haemoglobinopathies Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treosulfan

One Treosulfan dose per day administered i.v. on three consecutive days (-6, -5 and -4); given over 2 hours as part of background conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The dose has to be calculated as follows:

If the BSA (m2) is equal or less than 0.3, the Treosulfan dose should be 10g/m2/day.

If the BSA (m2) is greater than 0.3 and equal or less than 0.8, the Treosulfan dose should be 12g/m2/day.

If the BSA (m2) is greater than 0.8, the Treosulfan dose should be 14g/m2/day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treosulfan

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan

Total daily Busilvex dose (3.2 to 4.8 mg/kg/day, based on body weight) according to authorised dosage for children and adolescents administered i.v. as part of the background conditioning regimen on four consecutive days (days -7, -6, -5 and -4); given in 1, 2, or 4 portions per day according to the respective hospital's standard.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Busilvex

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treosulfan

Intervention Type DRUG

Busilvex

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Non-malignant disease indicated for first myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, including inborn errors of metabolism, primary immunodeficiencies, haemoglobinopathies and bone marrow failure syndromes.
2. First allogeneic HSCT.
3. Available matched sibling donor (MSD), matched family donor (MFD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). For bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) match is defined as at least 9/10 allele matches after four digit typing in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and DQB1 antigens. For umbilical cord blood (UCB) match is defined as at least 5/6 matches after two digit typing in HLA-A and -B and four digit typing in DRB1 antigens.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Second or later HSCT.
2. HSCT from mismatched donor (less than 9/10 BM/peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or less than 5/6 matched cord donor).
3. Preterm newborn infants (\<37 weeks gestational age) and term newborn infants aged 0 - 27 days at time of registration.
4. Obese paediatric patients with body mass index weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]² \> 30 kg/m².
5. Diagnosis of Fanconi anaemia and other chromosomal breakage disorders, radiosensitivity disorders (deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Ligase 4, Cernunnos- X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 4 (XRCC4) like factor (XLF), Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS)) and Dyskeratosis Congenita.
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Celerion

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Venn Life Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

medac GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karl-Walter Sykora, MD and Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hannover Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Motol, Dep. of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Department of Pediatric Oncology & Hematology, Charite Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

University Children's Hospital Essen Pediatric stem cell transplantation

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Frankfurt

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hannover Medical University, Dep. of Paediatrics, Paediatric Haematology and Oncology

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg University Hospital

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University of Jena, Department of Pediatrics

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, University Hospital, Clinic for Children and Adolescents

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

SC Oncoematologia Pediatrica Ospedale Pediatrico Microcitemico "Antonio Cao" A.O. Brotzu

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

UOC Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica con TMO AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto Trapianti Midollo Osseo Clinica Pediatrica Universitaria Fondazione MBBM-Ospedale San Gerardo

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

S.C. Oncoematologia Pediatrica Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Oncoematologia Pediatrica A.O. di Perugia Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

U.O. Oncoematologia Pediatrica Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana Ospedale S. Chiara

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Bambino Gesu Roma

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita Torino

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

U.O.C. Oncoematologia Pediatrica Policlinico "G.B. Rossi" - AOUI Verona

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

Szpital Uniwersytecki im. dr Antoniego Jurasza

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Uniwersytecki Szpital Dzieciecy w Krakowie

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Dzieciecy Szpital Kliniczny im. A. Gebali w Lublinie

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw Medical University, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and BMT

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Germany Italy Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MC-FludT.16/NM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of 3 Different Doses of IV Busulfan
NCT01985061 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Dose-range Finding Treosulfan-based Conditioning
NCT01063647 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2