Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-11-30
2006-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
NCT00598624
Treosulfan Based Conditioning Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT01062490
Treosulfan and Fludarabine in Treating Younger Patients Who Are Undergoing a Donor Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT00253513
MiniMUD Study - Unrelated Reduced Intensity Conditioning With Treosulfan® for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
NCT00129155
Treo/Flu/TBI With Donor Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01894477
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Treosulfan: 10 g/m² i.v. on 3 consecutive days (day -6 to -4)
Treosulfan
10 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
2
Treosulfan:12 g/m² i.v. on 3 consecutive days (day -6 to -4)
Treosulfan
12 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
3
Treosulfan: 14 g/m² i.v. on 3 consecutive days (day -6 to -4)
Treosulfan
14 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treosulfan
10 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
Treosulfan
12 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
Treosulfan
14 g/m² i.v. infusion, day -6, -5, -4
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CML in first or subsequent chronic phase
* NHL in 2nd CR/PR, chemosensitive PR after autologous transplantation ; CLL in 2nd or subsequent CR/PR
* Relapsed Morbus Hodgkin (MH) after autologous transplantation
* Multiple Myeloma (MM) stage II and III according to Durie and Salmon
* AML in 2nd CR/PR or high-risk AML in 1st CR/PR
High-risk defined for example by the following:
* Cytogenetics: -5/5q, -7/7q, del(5q), abnormalities of 3q, complex karyotype (\> 3 abnormalities), or
* PR after 1 cycle of induction therapy
* ALL in 2nd CR/PR or high-risk ALL in 1st CR/PR
High-risk defined as follows:
* Leukocytes \> 3000/µl (B-Linage) or \> 100000/µl (T-Linage);
* Pro-B-ALL, pre-T-ALL
* Cytogenetics: t(9;22)/BCR-ABL; t(4;11)/ALL1-AF
* MDS (patients without prior chemotherapy may be included)
2. Availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor (MRD) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD) or one mismatch (out of the 6 standard markers) sibling donor (1 misMRD):
• HLA-identity defined by the following markers: A, B, DRB1. DQB1 must be recorded.
3. Age \> 18 years
4. Karnofsky Index \> 80 %
5. Adequate contraception in female patients of child-bearing potential
6. Co-operative behavior of individual patients
7. Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe cardiac insufficiency, severe cardio-vascular or other severe concomitant diseases
3. Symptomatic malignant involvement of the CNS
4. Active infectious disease
5. HIV-positive or active hepatitis infection
6. Impaired liver function (Bilirubin \> 1.5 x upper normal limit; Transaminases \> 3.0 x upper normal limit)
7. Impaired renal function (Creatinine-clearance \< 60 ml/min; Serum Creatinine \> 1.5 x upper normal limit).
8. Pleural effusion or ascites \> 1.0 L
9. Pregnancy or lactation
10. Known hypersensitivity to fludarabine and/or treosulfan
11. Parallel participation in another experimental drug trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
medac GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
medac GmbH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mathias Freund, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Rostock
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, , Finland
Charité University Hospital Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
5th Medical Clinic, Clinic North
Nuremberg, , Germany
University Hospital Rostock
Rostock, , Germany
Silesian Medical University
Katowice, , Poland
Karolinska University Hospital & Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MC-FludT.6/L
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.