Treosulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate, and Total-Body Irradiation in Treating Patients With Hematological Cancer Who Are Undergoing Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant
NCT ID: NCT00796068
Last Updated: 2023-02-17
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-24
2021-12-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, and Total-Body Irradiation in Treating Patients With Hematologic Disease
NCT00719888
T-Regulatory Cell Infusion Post Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Cancer
NCT00602693
Cord Blood Transplant, Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, and Total-Body Irradiation in Treating Patients With High-Risk Hematologic Diseases
NCT06013423
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Using a Myeloablative Preparative Regimen for Hematological Diseases
NCT01962636
Donor Stem Cell Transplant With Treosulfan, Fludarabine, and Total-Body Irradiation for the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies
NCT04195633
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Graft failure/rejection and secondary graft failure.
II. Day -200 non-relapse mortality.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Platelet engraftment by six months.
II. Grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100 and one year.
III. Chronic GVHD.
IV. Clinically significant infections.
V. Overall survival.
VI. Relapse or disease progression.
VII. Immune reconstitution (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center \[FHCRC\] only).
VIII. Emergence of a dominant unit (FHCRC only).
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I (low risk for graft failure): Patients receive a conditioning regimen comprising fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) over 1 hour once daily (QD) on days -6 to -2 and treosulfan IV over 120 minutes on days - 6 to -4. Patients undergo TBI on day -1. Patients then undergo donor UCBT on day 0. Patients receive GVHD prophylaxis comprising cyclosporine IV over 1 hour or orally (PO) 2-3 times daily on days -3 to 100, followed by a taper in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil IV 3 times daily on days 0 to 40, followed by a taper in the absence of GVHD.
ARM II (high risk for graft failure): Patients receive a conditioning regimen, TBI, donor UCBT, GVHD prophylaxis, and mycophenolate mofetil as in Arm I.
After completion of the study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 months and 1 and 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (low risk for graft failure)
Patients receive a conditioning regimen comprising fludarabine phosphate IV over 1 hour QD on days -6 to -2 and treosulfan IV over 120 minutes on days - 6 to -4. Patients undergo TBI on day -1. Patients then undergo donor UCBT on day 0.
Patients receive GVHD prophylaxis comprising cyclosporine IV over 1 hour or PO 2-3 times daily on days -3 to 100, followed by a taper in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil IV 3 times daily on days 0 to 40, followed by a taper in the absence of GVHD.
Cyclosporine
Given IV or PO
Fludarabine Phosphate
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Given IV
Total-Body Irradiation
TBI administered day -1: 200 cGy (or escalated to 300 cGy, 400 cGy, or 450 cGy per protocol statistical section)
Treosulfan
Given IV
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Undergo single or double unit UCBT
Arm II (high risk for graft failure)
Patients receive a conditioning regimen, TBI, donor UCBT, GVHD prophylaxis, and mycophenolate mofetil as in Arm I.
Cyclosporine
Given IV or PO
Fludarabine Phosphate
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Given IV
Total-Body Irradiation
TBI administered day -1: 200 cGy (or escalated to 300 cGy, 400 cGy, or 450 cGy per protocol statistical section)
Treosulfan
Given IV
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Undergo single or double unit UCBT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cyclosporine
Given IV or PO
Fludarabine Phosphate
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Given IV
Total-Body Irradiation
TBI administered day -1: 200 cGy (or escalated to 300 cGy, 400 cGy, or 450 cGy per protocol statistical section)
Treosulfan
Given IV
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Undergo single or double unit UCBT
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): Any 2001 World Health Organization (WHO) classification subtype; refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-2 patients may proceed directly to transplant, but may also be considered for induction chemotherapy before transplant; patients with \>= 20% morphologic marrow blasts require induction therapy to reduce morphologic marrow blasts below 5% before transplant
* Chronic myelogenous leukemia: All types, except refractory blast crisis; chronic phase patients must have failed or been intolerant to Gleevec or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors
* Patients =\< 50 must have performance status score: Karnofsky (for adults) \>= 70 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1; Lansky (for children) score \>= 50
* Patients \> 50 must have Karnofsky performance score \>= 70 or ECOG 0-1 and comorbidity index \< 5
* Adequate cardiac function defined as absence of decompensated congestive heart failure or uncontrolled arrhythmia AND left ventricular ejection fraction \>= 35% OR fractional shortening \> 22%
* Adequate pulmonary function defined as absence of oxygen (O2) requirements and one of the following:
* Diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) corrected \>= 70% mm Hg
* DLCO corrected between 60% - 69% mm Hg and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) \>= 70 mm Hg
* DLCO corrected between 50% - 59% mm Hg and pO2 \>= 80 mm Hg
* Pediatric patients unable to perform pulmonary function tests must have O2 saturation \> 92% on room air; may not be on supplemental oxygen
* Adequate hepatic function; patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease will be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, histology, and the degree of portal hypertension; patients with fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis with evidence of portal hypertension or bridging fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, or correctable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL, and symptomatic biliary disease will be excluded
* Adequate renal function defined as creatinine =\< 2.0 mg/dl (adults) or estimated creatinine clearance \> 40 ml/min (pediatrics); all adults with a creatinine \> 1.2 or a history of renal dysfunction must have estimated creatinine clearance \> 40 ml/min
* If recent mold infection, e.g., Aspergillus, must be cleared by infectious disease to proceed
* Prior hematopoietic cell transplant: must be \>= 3 months after previous transplant
* DONOR: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching:
* Minimum requirement: The cord blood (CB) graft(s) must be matched at a minimum at 4/6 HLA-A, B, DRB1 loci with the recipient; therefore 0-2 mismatches at the A or B or DRB1 loci based on intermediate resolution A, B antigen and DRB1 allele typing for determination of HLA-match is allowed
* HLA-matching determined by high resolution typing is allowed per institutional guidelines as long as the minimum criteria (above) are met
* DONOR: Selection of two CB units is mandatory when a single cord blood unit does not meet the following criteria in the table below
* Match grade
* 6/6
* Single unit allowed for total nucleated cell (TNC) dose \>= 2.5 x 10\^7/kg
* 5/6, 4/6
* Single unit allowed for TNC dose \>= 4.0 (+/- 0.5) x 10\^7/kg
* If two CB units are used, the total cell dose of the combined units must be at least 3.0 x 10\^7 TNC per kilogram recipient weight based on pre-cryopreservation numbers, with each CB unit containing a MINIMUM of 1.5 x 10\^7 TNC/kg
* DONOR: The minimum recommended CD34/kg cell dose should be 2 x 10\^5 CD34/kg, total dose from a single or combined double
* DONOR: The unmanipulated CB unit(s) will be Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed or will be obtained under a separate investigational new drug (IND), such as the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) Protocol 10-CBA conducted under BB IND-7555 or another IND sponsored by (1) a participating institution or (2) an investigator at FHCRC or one of the participating institutions
* DONOR (FHCRC only): Up to 5% of the unmanipulated cord blood product (s), when ready for infusion, may be withheld for research purposes as long as thresholds for infused TNC dose are met; these products will be used to conduct studies involving the kinetics of engraftment and immunobiology of double cord transplantation
Exclusion Criteria
* Evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or known HIV positive serology
* Uncontrolled viral or bacterial infection at the time of study enrollment
* Active or recent (prior 6 month) invasive fungal infection without infectious diseases (ID) consult and approval
* Central nervous system (CNS) leukemic involvement not clearing with intrathecal chemotherapy and/or cranial radiation prior to initiation of conditioning (day -6)
* DONOR: Any cord blood units with \< 1.5 x 10\^7 total nucleated cells per kilogram recipient weight
* DONOR: Any cord blood units that have not passed donor screening for infectious disease markers as recommended by NMDP will not be used unless a waiver is signed by the clinical attending allowing use of CB unit. Cord blood units are presumed to be cytomegalovirus (CMV) negative regardless of serologic testing due to passive transmission of maternal CMV antibodies
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Filippo Milano
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Filippo Milano
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Milano F, Gutman JA, Deeg HJ, Nemecek ER, Baumgart J, Thur L, Dahlberg A, Salit RB, Summers C, Appelbaum FR, Delaney C. Treosulfan-based conditioning is feasible and effective for cord blood recipients: a phase 2 multicenter study. Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 28;4(14):3302-3310. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002222.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2010-00299
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2275
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2275.00
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RG2808000
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2275.00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.