PK-directed Dose Adjustment of IV Busulfan Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Lymphoma Patients

NCT ID: NCT00948090

Last Updated: 2014-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

207 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study for the outcome and safety of individualized busulfan dosing with cyclophosphamide and etoposide for patients preparing for a stem cell transplant to treat Non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Evaluation of progression-free survival, transplant related mortality, overall survival, and overall response rate, in subjects with NHL and HL receiving an IV busulfan-based conditioning regimen with PK-guided IV busulfan dosing, followed by autologous HSCT as well as comparison to those receiving carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) conditioning regimen (and its variants) obtained from registry data in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Assessment of the safety profile of a BuCyE conditioning regimen with PK-directed dosing of IV busulfan will also be completed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IV Busulfan

Pk-directed IV Busulfan (based on test dose method) for 4 days followed by Etoposide 1400mg/m2 QD for one day and Cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 QD for two days followed by autologous stem cell transplant

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IV Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Etoposide (BuCyE Regimen)

Intervention Type DRUG

Pk-directed IV Busulfan (based on test dose method) for 4 days followed by Etoposide 1400mg/m2 QD for one day and Cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 QD for two days followed by autologous stem cell transplant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IV Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Etoposide (BuCyE Regimen)

Pk-directed IV Busulfan (based on test dose method) for 4 days followed by Etoposide 1400mg/m2 QD for one day and Cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 QD for two days followed by autologous stem cell transplant.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects with NHL to be included:

* Any subject with NHL that had relapsed or progressed following initial therapy with an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen and has achieved a subsequent partial remission (PR) or a complete remission (CR) following a salvage chemotherapy regimen.
* Any subject with NHL that was initially refractory to an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen but who has achieved a PR or CR following a salvage chemotherapy regimen.
* Any subject with an initial International Prognostic Index (IPI) score 4-5 who achieved a PR or any CR following an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen except subjects with Mantle cell, T cell and Natural Killer (NK) cell pathologies.
* Subjects with Mantle cell, T cell and NK cell lymphoma may be enrolled if they have PR or CR after initial therapy.
* Any subject that has relapsed or progressed following previous autologous HSCT.

Subjects with HL to be included:

* Any subject with HL that had relapsed or progressed following initial therapy with an multi-drug chemotherapy regimen and has achieved a subsequent PR or a CR following a salvage chemotherapy regimen.
* Any subject with HL that is initially refractory to a multi-drug chemotherapy regimen but who has achieved a PR or CR following a salvage chemotherapy regimen.
* Any subject that has relapsed or progressed following previous autologous HSCT.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any subject with chemoresistant disease by demonstration of less than PR to most recent chemotherapy, and any subject with prior treatment history of autologous HSCT or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for any medical reason will be excluded.

Excluded will also be subjects with existing or active central nervous system lymphoma or human immunodeficiency virus related lymphoma, unacceptable organ function, or uncontrolled infections.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Agnes Elekes, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and commercialization

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama in Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Arizona Cancer Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Clinic

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UCSD Medical Center BMT Program

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sutter Cancer Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

University of California San Francisco Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital Cancer Institute

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois Cancer Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Chicago

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplant Program

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport/Feist Weiller Cancer Center

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center - Marlene & Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

The Western Pennsylvania Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

South Texas Veterans Health Care System

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Transplant Physician Group, PLLC

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University Hospital

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Saint John Regional Hospital

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - VG Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital MUHC

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

273-08-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of 3 Different Doses of IV Busulfan
NCT01985061 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2