Healthy Families Healthy Forces Study

NCT ID: NCT02348853

Last Updated: 2020-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

U.S. Army Medical Research \& Materiel Command Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC) is sponsoring the HF2 (Healthy Families, Healthy Forces) Study. This is a randomized trial comparing two different interventions for sustainable weight loss. Specifically, the investigators will compare a "current best practice (CBP)" intervention that includes standard dietary advice with a new, "Healthy Weight for Living (HWL)" intervention that includes recommendations to eat a diet rich in protein, dietary fiber, low glycemic index carbohydrates and low calorie foods. The objective of this study is to compare the CBP and HWL interventions when delivered to adult dependents of active duty (AD) military personnel and measure weight loss effects in both the adult dependents and the AD military personnel they live with.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized trial comparing two different interventions for sustainable weight loss. Specifically researchers will compare a current best practice (CBP) intervention that includes standard dietary advice with a new Healthy Weight for Living (HWL) intervention that includes recommendations to eat a diet rich in protein, dietary fiber and low glycemic index carbohydrates. The population will be adult dependents of Active Duty (AD) military personnel or retired military personnel (direct intervention participants) and the AD or retired military personnel they live with (indirect intervention participants). The primary outcome will be weight change from baseline to 1 year in the adult dependents. The objective of this study is to compare the CBP and HWL interventions when delivered to adult dependents of AD or retired military personnel and measure weight loss effects in both the adult dependents and the AD or retired military personnel they live with. The working hypothesis is that that the HWL intervention will result in significantly greater weight loss over 1 year than the CBP intervention in an intent-to-treat analysis in adult dependents, and that the greater weight loss in HWL will be associated with greater management of hunger and greater adherence to the goal of reducing energy intake. Weight change up until the 18-24 month period will be measured as a secondary outcome in a cohort of participants who will reach the 18-24 month milestone in the study on or prior to December, 2018. A per protocol analysis will also be applied for comparison of the two weight loss arms. (In addition, weight change will be measured in the participants' AD or retired military personnel partner to test the hypothesis that there is a ripple effect of benefits from the interventions associated with effects in the primary recipients.) The original study plan was to examine weight change over 2 years but due to slower recruiting than anticipated the hypotheses were revised to allow for 1 year to be the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes in the subgroup followed until 18-24 months.

The researchers plan to test our central hypothesis and accomplish the study objectives with the following technical objectives:

1. Conduct a randomized trial comparing the HWL intervention to the CBP intervention over 1 year in adult dependents of AD or retired military personnel. The primary outcome will be weight change from baseline to 1 year. The working hypothesis is that randomization to the HWL intervention will result in significantly greater weight loss over 1 year than randomization to the CBP intervention, and that greater weight loss in the HWL intervention will be associated with greater adherence to the goals of reducing energy intake and hunger.
2. Compare the change in weight loss of participants in the HWL intervention to the CBP intervention over the 18-24 month timepoints in the subgroup of participants who will reach the 18-24 month milestone on or prior to December, 2018. The working hypothesis is that randomization to the HWL intervention will result in significantly improved weight loss retention compared to randomization to the CBP intervention.
3. Examine the effects of the interventions delivered to adult dependents of AD or retired military personnel on the weight of AD or retired military personnel themselves. The working hypothesis, based on preliminary data, is that there will be a "ripple" effect of program benefits from intervention participants to the AD or retired military personnel they live with; specifically, overweight and obese AD or retired military personnel will lose more weight if their partner is randomized to the HWL intervention compared to the CBP intervention, because the weight loss of AD or retired military personnel indirectly exposed to the intervention will be proportional to the weight loss of their adult dependent who is directly exposed.
4. Compare the effects of the two interventions on changes in cardiometabolic risk factors. The working hypothesis is that there will be significantly greater improvements between baseline and 1 year in key cardiometabolic risk factors in adult dependents enrolled in the HWL intervention compared to the CBP intervention, and differences between groups will be predicted by differences in weight loss. For a select subgroup of participants who reach the 18-24 month timepoint on or prior to December 2018, the working hypothesis is that there will be significantly greater improvements in between baseline and 2 years in key cardiometabolic risk factors in adult dependents enrolled in the HWL compared to the CBP intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overweight Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy Weight For Living (HWL)

HWL is a behavioral intervention designed to effectively facilitate hunger suppression with several concurrent approaches. Hunger suppression is a core behavioral goal of the intervention, and strategies will be used to support that goal, for example increasing meal frequency and encouraging the use of highly satiating low-energy foods to reduce hunger acutely. A unique combination of healthy dietary goals will be recommended that support hunger suppression and/or maintenance of satiety: high total dietary fiber, moderately high protein, moderately low glycemic load (GL) and low energy density.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Healthy Weight for Living (HWL)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Current Best Practice (CBP)

This intervention is an adapted version of Group Lifestyle Balance which is a validated weight loss program for community groups and military populations that is an official adaptation of the gold standard Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Balance intensive research intervention. It has both training programs for interventionists and program material available on the web and is also slightly modified from the Diabetes Prevention Program study to take into account changing national nutrition recommendations.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Current Best Practice (CBP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Healthy Weight for Living (HWL)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Current Best Practice (CBP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult dependent of active duty (AD) military personnel: an individual who is at least 18 years and have a military identification(ID) card indicating they are a dependent.
* This includes AD military sponsor's children at least 18 years of age (by birth or adoption), spouse, partner, parents, and parent-in-laws)
* At the time of enrollment, willing to be randomized to one of the intervention groups and complete outcome assessments, at least 18 years old at time of provision of informed consent
* BMI at screening greater than or equal to 25.0 kg/m2
* English speaking
* AD military personnel: AD military personnel do not have to meet any criteria other than having an adult partner enrolled in the weight loss program.

Exclusion Criteria

* Adult dependent of AD military personnel: BMI \<25
* Pregnant
* Expecting to become pregnant within duration of the study, or lactating
* Prior weight loss surgery
* Concurrent participation in another weight loss program or research study
* Non-English speaking
* Currently undergoing divorce proceedings
* Very active individuals (\> 2 hours/day vigorous activity)
* Individuals who have lost \> 10 lb in the past 6 months
* Individuals with thyroid disease who have had changes in medications within the past 3 months
* Individuals with Type 1 diabetes and individuals with Type 2 diabetes who started using insulin in childhood (before 18 years)
* Those with stomach or intestinal resection, including gastric bypass or other weight loss surgery that influences food intake or absorption of food
* Those with eating disorder such as anorexia, bulimia or binge-eating disorder currently or within the past 5 years
* Those with diagnosis of celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease or any condition that influences ability to absorb food
* Those with current moderate to severe depression that prevents individual engaging in work or usual activities
* Those with recent unstable heart disease, myocardial infarction
* Active cancer
* Taking medication for severe kidney disease
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Immunologic disorders
* AIDS
* Schizophrenia
* Psychosis or bipolar disorder
* Individuals who drink \>3 drinks daily or \>20 drinks/week
* Individuals with other diseases or taking other medications that impact ability to comply with the intervention core goal of achieving weight loss of 1-2 lb per week through some combination of changing types and amounts of consumed foods and exercise
* Excluded medications include steroids except topical preparations.
* AD military personnel: Those not currently living with the dependent due to separation and/or divorce proceedings will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tufts University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Susan Roberts

Senior Scientist & Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susan B Roberts, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tufts University Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Das SK, Bukhari AS, Taetzsch AG, Ernst AK, Rogers GT, Gilhooly CH, Hatch-McChesney A, Blanchard CM, Livingston KA, Silver RE, Martin E, McGraw SM, Chin MK, Vail TA, Lutz LJ, Montain SJ, Pittas AG, Lichtenstein AH, Allison DB, Dickinson S, Chen X, Saltzman E, Young AJ, Roberts SB. Randomized trial of a novel lifestyle intervention compared with the Diabetes Prevention Program for weight loss in adult dependents of military service members. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Oct 4;114(4):1546-1559. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab259.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34375387 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13035001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physical Activity Choices Everyday
NCT03824769 COMPLETED NA
The Healthy Weight for Life Program
NCT01470222 COMPLETED NA
mFit: The Mobile Fitness Project
NCT01650337 COMPLETED NA
The Healthy Weigh Study
NCT02878343 COMPLETED NA