Rural Lifestyle Intervention Treatment Effectiveness Trial

NCT ID: NCT00912652

Last Updated: 2018-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

612 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

More and more Americans are becoming overweight. The rates of overweight are especially high in rural areas of the country. Until now, there has been little access to weight management programs in rural areas. This study will examine ways to help individuals from rural counties to manage weight and improve fitness. To do this, three doses of lifestyle treatment (Low, Moderate and High)will be compared to an education control condition. Our principal hypothesis is that both the Moderate and High conditions will have greater weight loss at two years than either the Low or Control conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Higher rates of obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and coronary heart disease are observed in rural than in non-rural areas of the U.S., yet the treatment of obesity in the rural population has received little attention. Efficacy trials, conducted in academic health centers, show that lifestyle interventions can produce sufficient weight reductions to improve health, but very few trials have been carried out in medically underserved community settings. Moreover, the high intensity of treatments used in efficacy studies represents a barrier to dissemination into rural settings. The existing infrastructure of the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service, with over 2900 offices nationwide, may serve as a valuable resource for bringing lifestyle interventions to rural areas. Preliminary data from our rural obesity research program show promising findings for lifestyle interventions delivered through Extension offices. The next logical step in this line of research is to determine the minimum intensity of treatment required to produce clinically meaningful, long-term weight reductions. We propose to conduct a single-blind, multi-site, randomized controlled trial in obese adults (N=542) to evaluate the effects of LOW, MODERATE, and HIGH doses of lifestyle treatment on two-year changes in body weight, compared to an education CONTROL condition. The LOW intensity condition reflects the dose of group treatment commonly used in community settings, whereas the HIGH dose corresponds to the intensity level employed in efficacy trials. The MODERATE intensity intervention represents a treatment dose that our preliminary data suggest may provide benefits comparable to the HIGH intensity intervention. Our principal hypothesis is that both the MODERATE and HIGH interventions will produce greater weight reductions at two years than either the LOW or CONTROL conditions. We will also evaluate the proportion of participants in each condition, who achieve clinically significant weight losses, and we will examine changes in metabolic risk factors, dietary intake, physical activity, and quality of life. We will calculate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions, and we will investigate potential mediators of long-term change.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Intensity Lifestyle Intervention

High intensity group will receive 48 sessions of lifestyle intervention over a two-year period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lifestyle intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Three doses of lifestyle intervention will be compared to an education control condition.

Mod. Intensity Lifestyle Intervention

Moderate intensity group will receive 32 sessions of lifestyle intervention over a two-year period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lifestyle intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Three doses of lifestyle intervention will be compared to an education control condition.

Low Intensity Lifestyle Intervention

Low intensity group will receive 16 sessions of lifestyle intervention over a two-year period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lifestyle intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Three doses of lifestyle intervention will be compared to an education control condition.

Health Education Control

Health education control group will receive 16 sessions of health education related to diet and exercise over a two-year period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Health Education Control

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health education control group will receive 16 session of health education related to diet and exercise over a two-year period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lifestyle intervention

Three doses of lifestyle intervention will be compared to an education control condition.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health Education Control

Health education control group will receive 16 session of health education related to diet and exercise over a two-year period.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 21 to 75 years
* Body Mass Index: 30 to 45 kg/m\*\*2

Exclusion Criteria

* Underlying disease likely to limit lifespan and/or increase risk of interventions:cancer requiring treatment in past five years (exception: non-melanoma skin cancer); serious infectious diseases (e.g., self-reported HIV, self-reported tuberculosis or treatment); myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within the last six months; unstable angina within the past six months; congestive heart failure; chronic hepatitis; cirrhosis; chronic malabsorption syndrome; chronic pancreatitis; irritable bowel syndrome; previous bariatric surgery; history of organ transplantation; history of musculoskeletal conditions that limit walking; chronic lung diseases that limit physical activity; and any other condition likely to limit five-year life expectancy.
* Metabolic exclusions: fasting blood glucose \> 125 mg/dl at screening if not known to be diabetic (diabetic patients under active treatment will be enrolled if approved by primary provider); fasting serum triglycerides \> 400 mg/dl at screening; resting blood pressure \> 140/90 mm Hg.
* Medication exclusions: antipsychotic agents; monoamine oxidase inhibitors; systemic corticosteroids; antibiotics for HIV or Tuberculosis; chemotherapeutic drugs; or use of prescription weight-loss drugs within six months.
* Conditions or behaviors likely to affect the conduct of the trial: unwilling or unable to give informed consent; unable to read English at the 5th grade level; unwilling to accept random assignment; unwilling to travel to Extension office for intervention sessions; participation in another randomized research project; weight loss \> 10 pounds in past six months; likely to move out of the county in next two years; major psychiatric disorder; excessive alcohol intake; BMI \> 45; prior participation in the TOURS trial; and other conditions which in the opinion of staff would adversely affect participation in the trial
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael G. Perri, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Levy County

Bronson, Florida, United States

Site Status

Flagler County

Bunnell, Florida, United States

Site Status

Dixie County

Cross City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Putnam County

East Palatka, Florida, United States

Site Status

Suwannee County

Live Oak, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baker County

Macclenny, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lafayette County

Mayo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradford County

Starke, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perri MG, Limacher MC, von Castel-Roberts K, Daniels MJ, Durning PE, Janicke DM, Bobroff LB, Radcliff TA, Milsom VA, Kim C, Martin AD. Comparative effectiveness of three doses of weight-loss counseling: two-year findings from the rural LITE trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Nov;22(11):2293-300. doi: 10.1002/oby.20832.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25376396 (View on PubMed)

Radcliff TA, Cote MJ, Whittington MD, Daniels MJ, Bobroff LB, Janicke DM, Perri MG. Cost-Effectiveness of Three Doses of a Behavioral Intervention to Prevent or Delay Type 2 Diabetes in Rural Areas. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jul;120(7):1163-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31899170 (View on PubMed)

Bauman V, Ariel-Donges AH, Gordon EL, Daniels MJ, Xu D, Ross KM, Limacher MC, Perri MG. Effect of dose of behavioral weight loss treatment on glycemic control in adults with prediabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 May 28;7(1):e000653. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000653. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31245006 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R18HL087800

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

RuralLITE-N

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Supporting Decisions on Lifestyle Change
NCT06206954 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA