Treatment of Obesity in Underserved Rural Settings (TOURS)

NCT ID: NCT00201006

Last Updated: 2014-03-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

234 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-06-30

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To test the effectiveness of interventions designed to promote long-term weight management of obese women in medically underserved rural counties.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

The recent dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity has heightened awareness of the significant impact of overweight, physical inactivity, and unhealthy eating patterns on the development of chronic diseases and disability While there is little doubt that obesity and associated lifestyle factors (e.g., sedentary lifestyle) constitute serious threats to health, it is also clear that lifestyle interventions can produce body weight reductions of sufficient magnitude to improve health. The existing research is limited, however, with respect to two important factors, specifically, its generalizability to underserved populations, and the maintenance of treatment effects. Most weight-loss trials have consisted of efficacy studies conducted with middle-class participants and delivered in "optimal" (i.e., academic research) venues rather than in "real world" (i.e., community) settings. Furthermore, the existing literature shows that, in the absence of long-term care, a regaining of lost weight routinely follows the conclusion of treatment. Recent research has shown improved maintenance of lost weight when lifestyle interventions are supplemented with clinic-based follow-up programs. Thus, the next logical steps in this line of research are (a) to extend these studies to community settings with underserved populations and (b) to test promising alternative and potentially more efficient modes of treatment delivery, such as follow-up care via telephone-based contacts rather than via in-person clinic visits.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

A randomized controlled clinical trial will examine the impact of two maintenance interventions designed to sustain weight lost in lifestyle treatment of obesity. The study sample will include 300 obese women, ages 50-75 years, from medically underserved rural areas in North Central Florida. All participants will receive a 6-month lifestyle intervention for weight loss (called Phase 1) followed by randomization to one of three 12-month follow-up (called Phase 2) programs: (A) a Face-to-Face Office-Based Maintenance Program, (B) a Telephone-Based Maintenance Program, or (C) an Education Comparison Condition. Participants will be stratified according to county and to BMI, and randomly assigned in groups of 11-12 to one of the two experimental programs or to the comparison condition. The experimental maintenance programs are designed to help participants sustain the eating and physical activity patterns needed to maintain lost weight. The primary difference between the two maintenance programs is their mode of delivery. One will be delivered via an office-based group counseling format; the other will be delivered via telephone counseling. The education comparison condition will involve a program of print materials on the maintenance of a healthy lifestyle delivered via biweekly newsletters.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Face-to-face counseling

26 biweekly face-to-face group counseling sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Face-to-face counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Biweekly group behavioral counseling sessions conducted in a face-to-face format

Telephone Counseling

26 biweekly telephone counseling sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Telephone counseling

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Biweekly telephone counseling sessions conducted in a one-on-one format

Mail contact

26 biweekly newsletters with weight management advice

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mail contact

Intervention Type OTHER

Biweekly written newsletters with weight management advice delivered via U.S. mail

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Face-to-face counseling

Biweekly group behavioral counseling sessions conducted in a face-to-face format

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Telephone counseling

Biweekly telephone counseling sessions conducted in a one-on-one format

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mail contact

Biweekly written newsletters with weight management advice delivered via U.S. mail

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

BMI between 30 and 45

Exclusion Criteria

presence of serious disease
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael G Perri, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perri MG, Limacher MC, Durning PE, Janicke DM, Lutes LD, Bobroff LB, Dale MS, Daniels MJ, Radcliff TA, Martin AD. Extended-care programs for weight management in rural communities: the treatment of obesity in underserved rural settings (TOURS) randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2347-54. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2347.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19029500 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HL073326

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

273

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Weight Loss Clinical Decision Support
NCT05198765 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Piloting a Patient Navigator Program for Weight Loss
NCT06972381 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Barriers to Treatment in Obese Adolescents
NCT00167830 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2