Femoral Blockade and Low-dose Spinal Anesthesia in Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
NCT ID: NCT02322372
Last Updated: 2015-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Two Different Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04286035
Comparison Of Femoral Block And Middle Adductor Canal Block In Patients With Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04768764
Concentration Effect of Local Anesthetics on Femoral Nerve Block Efficiency
NCT03623230
Comparison of Fasia Iliac Compartment Block and 4in1 Block
NCT06436105
Study to Find Optimal Dose of Local Spinal Anesthetic (Mepivacaine) Combined With Narcotic (Fentanyl) For Knee Surgery
NCT01701102
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients were allocated to two groups as the spinal anesthesia with conventional dose of heavy bupivacaine or spinal anesthesia with low dose heavy bupivacaine combined with femoral blockade.
Blood pressures and heart rates were recorded at the beginning, at the 0th minute following femoral block, at the 0th minute and in two-minute intervals following spinal anesthesia for 20 minutes and in five-minute intervals till the end of surgery.
The sensorial block and motor block in both extremities were recorded in two-minute intervals following spinal anesthesia and in five-minute intervals till the end of surgery The time of sensorial blockade to reach T12, maximum level of sensorial blockade level and the time to reach maximum level of sensorial blockade and the time for regression of sensorial blockade to L2, the time for regression of motor blockade were recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group F
Ultrasound-guided femoral blockade with 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% diluted in 15 mL saline was performed in supine position. Then the patient was turned to lateral decubitus position with the operated extremity on dependant position and intrathecal injection of heavy bupivacaine 1 mL (5 mg) was administered from L3-L4 intervertebral space at a rate of 1 mL/20 second.
.
Femoral blockade
Spinal anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine combined with femoral blockade with bupivacaine
Group S
The patient was turned to lateral decubitus position with the operated extremity on dependant position and intrathecal injection of heavy bupivacaine 2 mL (10 mg) was administered from L3-L4 intervertebral space at a rate of 1 mL/20 second.
Intrathecal anesthesia
Spinal anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Femoral blockade
Spinal anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine combined with femoral blockade with bupivacaine
Intrathecal anesthesia
Spinal anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of previous spinal surgery
* Presence of diabetes mellitus
* Presence of neurological disturbance
* Uncooperated patients, patients not accepting to participate the study
* Allergy to study drugs
* ASA II-IV patients, BMI \>38, Height \< 150 cm and \>190 cm
25 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sanem Cakar Turhan
Specialist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ramazan Akmese, Specialist
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine
Fatma Ozkan, Assistant
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara University Medical School Anesthesiology and ICU Department
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Turhan KS, Akmese R, Ozkan F, Okten FF. Comparison of low-dose spinal anesthesia and single-shot femoral block combination with conventional dose spinal anesthesia in outpatient arthroscopic meniscus repair. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Apr;19(8):1489-97.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30/06/2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.